Systemic transphobia and ongoing barriers to healthcare for transgender and nonbinary people: A historical analysis of #TransHealthFail.

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000718
Allison J McLaughlin, Saren Nonoyama, Lauren Glupe, Jordon D Bosse
{"title":"Systemic transphobia and ongoing barriers to healthcare for transgender and nonbinary people: A historical analysis of #TransHealthFail.","authors":"Allison J McLaughlin, Saren Nonoyama, Lauren Glupe, Jordon D Bosse","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transgender (T+) people report negative healthcare experiences such as being misgendered, pathologizing gender, and gatekeeping care, as well as treatment refusal. Less is known about T+ patients' perceptions of interrelated factors associated with, and consequences of, negative experiences. The purpose of this analysis was to explore T+ patients' negative healthcare experiences through Twitter posts using the hashtag #transhealthfail. Publicly available Tweets published between July 2015 and November 2021 from US-based Twitter accounts were collected via Mozdeh. Tweets were deductively analyzed for content using a list of a-priori codes developed from existing literature. Additional codes were developed as new ideas emerged from the data. When possible, type of care location, providers interacted with, and initial reason for seeking care were extracted. Each Tweet was coded by at least two team members using NVivo12. A total of 1,340 tweets from 652 unique Twitter users were analyzed. Negative experiences were reported across healthcare settings and professional types, with physicians, nurses, and counselors/therapists being named most frequently. Primary antecedents of negative healthcare experiences and barriers to accessing care were related to health insurance issues and providers' lack of knowledge, discomfort, and binary gender beliefs. Negative healthcare interactions led T+ patients to perceive receiving a different standard of care and having unmet needs, which could lead to delaying/avoiding care in the future. As such, these results highlight the potential for direct and indirect harm related to providers' specific actions. Patient strategies to prevent and/or manage negative encounters and care facilitators were also identified. A multi-pronged approach addressing healthcare policy, improving knowledge and attitudes of healthcare providers and ancillary staff, and creating clinical settings that are physically and psychologically safe for T+ patients is critical to improving the healthcare experiences, and ultimately health, of T+ people.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 3","pages":"e0000718"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11902059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transgender (T+) people report negative healthcare experiences such as being misgendered, pathologizing gender, and gatekeeping care, as well as treatment refusal. Less is known about T+ patients' perceptions of interrelated factors associated with, and consequences of, negative experiences. The purpose of this analysis was to explore T+ patients' negative healthcare experiences through Twitter posts using the hashtag #transhealthfail. Publicly available Tweets published between July 2015 and November 2021 from US-based Twitter accounts were collected via Mozdeh. Tweets were deductively analyzed for content using a list of a-priori codes developed from existing literature. Additional codes were developed as new ideas emerged from the data. When possible, type of care location, providers interacted with, and initial reason for seeking care were extracted. Each Tweet was coded by at least two team members using NVivo12. A total of 1,340 tweets from 652 unique Twitter users were analyzed. Negative experiences were reported across healthcare settings and professional types, with physicians, nurses, and counselors/therapists being named most frequently. Primary antecedents of negative healthcare experiences and barriers to accessing care were related to health insurance issues and providers' lack of knowledge, discomfort, and binary gender beliefs. Negative healthcare interactions led T+ patients to perceive receiving a different standard of care and having unmet needs, which could lead to delaying/avoiding care in the future. As such, these results highlight the potential for direct and indirect harm related to providers' specific actions. Patient strategies to prevent and/or manage negative encounters and care facilitators were also identified. A multi-pronged approach addressing healthcare policy, improving knowledge and attitudes of healthcare providers and ancillary staff, and creating clinical settings that are physically and psychologically safe for T+ patients is critical to improving the healthcare experiences, and ultimately health, of T+ people.

系统性的跨性别恐惧症和跨性别和非二元性别人群在医疗保健方面的持续障碍:对#跨健康失败#的历史分析。
变性人(T+)报告了负面的医疗保健经历,如性别错误、病态化性别、把关护理以及拒绝治疗。对于T+患者对负面经历的相关因素和后果的认知了解较少。本分析的目的是通过使用# tranhealthfail标签的Twitter帖子来探索T+患者的负面医疗体验。2015年7月至2021年11月期间,美国推特账户发布的公开推文通过Mozdeh收集。使用从现有文献中开发的先验代码列表对推文的内容进行演绎分析。随着新的想法从数据中浮现,更多的代码被开发出来。在可能的情况下,提取了护理地点的类型、与之互动的提供者以及寻求护理的最初原因。每条推文都由至少两名团队成员使用NVivo12进行编码。总共分析了来自652个独立Twitter用户的1340条推文。在医疗环境和专业类型中都有负面经历的报告,其中医生、护士和咨询师/治疗师的名字最常见。消极的医疗保健经历和获得护理的障碍的主要前因与健康保险问题和提供者缺乏知识、不适和二元性别信仰有关。消极的医疗互动导致T+患者认为接受了不同的护理标准,并且需求未得到满足,这可能导致未来延迟或避免护理。因此,这些结果突出了与提供者的具体行为有关的直接和间接伤害的可能性。还确定了患者预防和/或管理负面接触和护理促进者的策略。多管齐下的方法解决医疗保健政策问题,改善医疗保健提供者和辅助人员的知识和态度,并为T+患者创造生理和心理安全的临床环境,对于改善T+患者的医疗保健体验和最终健康至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信