Outcomes of biosynthetic collagen prostheses with comparison to cryopreserved arterial homografts for bypass reconstruction in infrainguinal vascular graft infections.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Matthaeus Zerdzitzki, Karin Pfister, Wilma Schierling, Florian Zeman, Ingolf Toepel, Markus Steinbauer, Thomas Betz
{"title":"Outcomes of biosynthetic collagen prostheses with comparison to cryopreserved arterial homografts for bypass reconstruction in infrainguinal vascular graft infections.","authors":"Matthaeus Zerdzitzki, Karin Pfister, Wilma Schierling, Florian Zeman, Ingolf Toepel, Markus Steinbauer, Thomas Betz","doi":"10.1177/14574969251320721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Managing infrainguinal vascular graft infections (VGI) in bypass reconstruction is complex. Although an autologous vein is the preferred graft material, alternative conduits are required when autologous veins are unavailable. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of cryopreserved arterial homografts and biosynthetic glutaraldehydemodifiedovine collagen grafts (Omniflow II) for the treatment of infrainguinal VGI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was retrospective across two centers and included patients with infrainguinal VGI treated with cryopreserved arterial homografts or Omniflow II grafts between 2009 and 2019. Freedom from reinfection, primary patency rates, amputation-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed using 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 63 patients with infrainguinal VGI were treated with either Omniflow II grafts (n = 34) or cryopreserved arterial homografts (n = 29). At 5 years, freedom from reinfection was 97.1% for Omniflow II grafts and 93.1% for cryopreserved arterial homografts (p = .4). Primary patency was 50% for Omniflow II grafts and 55.2% for the cryopreserved arterial homografts (p = .5). Amputation-free survival was 52.9% for Omniflow II grafts and 55.2% for cryopreserved arterial homografts (p = .7). No graft degeneration or graft ruptures were observed during the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that biosynthetic grafts are viable and accessible alternatives for traditional graft materials, offering similar efficacy and ease of use. Although autologous vein grafts remain the gold standard for VGI management, biosynthetic grafts may serve as a viable alternatives to cryopreserved arterial homografts in the treatment of infrainguinal VGIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"14574969251320721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969251320721","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Managing infrainguinal vascular graft infections (VGI) in bypass reconstruction is complex. Although an autologous vein is the preferred graft material, alternative conduits are required when autologous veins are unavailable. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of cryopreserved arterial homografts and biosynthetic glutaraldehydemodifiedovine collagen grafts (Omniflow II) for the treatment of infrainguinal VGI.

Methods: The study was retrospective across two centers and included patients with infrainguinal VGI treated with cryopreserved arterial homografts or Omniflow II grafts between 2009 and 2019. Freedom from reinfection, primary patency rates, amputation-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed using 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Results: Overall, 63 patients with infrainguinal VGI were treated with either Omniflow II grafts (n = 34) or cryopreserved arterial homografts (n = 29). At 5 years, freedom from reinfection was 97.1% for Omniflow II grafts and 93.1% for cryopreserved arterial homografts (p = .4). Primary patency was 50% for Omniflow II grafts and 55.2% for the cryopreserved arterial homografts (p = .5). Amputation-free survival was 52.9% for Omniflow II grafts and 55.2% for cryopreserved arterial homografts (p = .7). No graft degeneration or graft ruptures were observed during the follow-up.

Conclusions: This study suggests that biosynthetic grafts are viable and accessible alternatives for traditional graft materials, offering similar efficacy and ease of use. Although autologous vein grafts remain the gold standard for VGI management, biosynthetic grafts may serve as a viable alternatives to cryopreserved arterial homografts in the treatment of infrainguinal VGIs.

生物合成胶原假体与低温保存同种动脉移植在腹股沟下血管移植感染中搭桥重建的效果比较。
背景和目的:腹股沟下血管移植感染(VGI)在搭桥重建中的处理是复杂的。虽然自体静脉是首选的移植物材料,但当无法获得自体静脉时,需要替代导管。本研究旨在比较低温保存动脉同种移植物和生物合成戊二醛分化牛胶原移植物(Omniflow II)治疗腹股沟下VGI的疗效。方法:该研究是回顾性的,涉及两个中心,包括2009年至2019年期间接受冷冻保留动脉同种移植物或Omniflow II移植物治疗的腹股沟下VGI患者。使用5年Kaplan-Meier估计值分析无再感染、原发通畅率、无截肢生存率和总生存率。结果:总的来说,63例腹股沟下VGI患者接受了Omniflow II型移植物(n = 34)或低温保存动脉同种移植物(n = 29)的治疗。在5年时,Omniflow II型移植物的再感染发生率为97.1%,低温保存动脉同种移植物的再感染发生率为93.1% (p = 0.4)。Omniflow II型移植物的初次通畅率为50%,低温保存动脉同种移植物的初次通畅率为55.2% (p = 0.5)。Omniflow II型移植物的无截肢生存率为52.9%,低温保存动脉同种移植物的无截肢生存率为55.2% (p = 0.7)。随访期间未见移植物退变或破裂。结论:该研究表明生物合成移植物是传统移植物材料的可行和可获得的替代品,具有相似的疗效和易用性。虽然自体静脉移植仍然是治疗VGI的金标准,但生物合成移植物可能是治疗腹股沟下VGI的可行选择,而不是冷冻保存的动脉同种移植物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (SJS) is the official peer reviewed journal of the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. It publishes original and review articles from all surgical fields and specialties to reflect the interests of our diverse and international readership that consists of surgeons from all specialties and continents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信