Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection amongst health workers, Windhoek, Namibia.

Kaveto Sikuvi, Natasha Nghitukwa, Ndiitodino Kakehongo, Ismael Katjitae, Carolina Matos, Philip Oedi, Sibongile Manga Netha, Emmanuel Nepolo, Christian Winter
{"title":"Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection amongst health workers, Windhoek, Namibia.","authors":"Kaveto Sikuvi, Natasha Nghitukwa, Ndiitodino Kakehongo, Ismael Katjitae, Carolina Matos, Philip Oedi, Sibongile Manga Netha, Emmanuel Nepolo, Christian Winter","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As of 24 October 2021, 128,868 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases and 3550 deaths were reported from Namibia. The national COVID-19 vaccination campaign that started in March 2021 included health workers (HWs) as a priority group. The vaccines most administered were Sinopharm, AstraZeneca, Pfizer-BioNtech, and Janssen. We aimed to measure the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines (VE) amongst HWs against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in Namibia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a test negative design (TND) amongst HWs from the two main hospitals treating COVID-19 patients. HWs were defined as all hospital staff over 18 years in direct or indirect contact with patients, eligible for COVID-19 vaccination. We interviewed actively recruited HWs with standardized questionnaires in-person from 25/10/2021 to 25/4/2022. The participants had to state their vaccination status, which was verified through vaccination card, vaccine registry and/or District Health Information System 2. RT-PCR testing of respiratory specimens and serological testing (Wantai and Platelia-ELISA) were conducted. We measured VE by comparing the vaccination status between RT-PCR positive and negative HWs using a multivariable logistic regression model, which was adjusted for confounders. We calculated VE = (1-odds ratio of vaccination)*100 %.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1201 HWs of which 322 (26.8 %) participants were fully vaccinated with a primary series against COVID-19, 62 (5.2 %) were partially vaccinated and 735 (61.2 %) were not vaccinated. In total, 1119 (93 %) participants had antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 including 637 (90 %) of the unvaccinated participants. Fifty-eight (4.8 %) participants tested RT-PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2. The Omicron variant was detected in all 13 sequenced genomes (11 BA.1.18, 2 BA.1). The estimated overall VE for full vaccination was 61.8 % (95 %-confidence interval, 9.3-83.9 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The VE results suggest that COVID-19 vaccines used in Namibia provided good protection from infections with the Omicron variant even if many participants had a SARS-CoV-2 infection before the study. Therefore, COVID-19 vaccines should be administered to risk groups such as HWs independent from previous infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":" ","pages":"126977"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: As of 24 October 2021, 128,868 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases and 3550 deaths were reported from Namibia. The national COVID-19 vaccination campaign that started in March 2021 included health workers (HWs) as a priority group. The vaccines most administered were Sinopharm, AstraZeneca, Pfizer-BioNtech, and Janssen. We aimed to measure the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines (VE) amongst HWs against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in Namibia.

Methods: We conducted a test negative design (TND) amongst HWs from the two main hospitals treating COVID-19 patients. HWs were defined as all hospital staff over 18 years in direct or indirect contact with patients, eligible for COVID-19 vaccination. We interviewed actively recruited HWs with standardized questionnaires in-person from 25/10/2021 to 25/4/2022. The participants had to state their vaccination status, which was verified through vaccination card, vaccine registry and/or District Health Information System 2. RT-PCR testing of respiratory specimens and serological testing (Wantai and Platelia-ELISA) were conducted. We measured VE by comparing the vaccination status between RT-PCR positive and negative HWs using a multivariable logistic regression model, which was adjusted for confounders. We calculated VE = (1-odds ratio of vaccination)*100 %.

Results: We included 1201 HWs of which 322 (26.8 %) participants were fully vaccinated with a primary series against COVID-19, 62 (5.2 %) were partially vaccinated and 735 (61.2 %) were not vaccinated. In total, 1119 (93 %) participants had antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 including 637 (90 %) of the unvaccinated participants. Fifty-eight (4.8 %) participants tested RT-PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2. The Omicron variant was detected in all 13 sequenced genomes (11 BA.1.18, 2 BA.1). The estimated overall VE for full vaccination was 61.8 % (95 %-confidence interval, 9.3-83.9 %).

Conclusions: The VE results suggest that COVID-19 vaccines used in Namibia provided good protection from infections with the Omicron variant even if many participants had a SARS-CoV-2 infection before the study. Therefore, COVID-19 vaccines should be administered to risk groups such as HWs independent from previous infections.

纳米比亚温得和克,COVID-19疫苗对卫生工作者中实验室确诊的SARS-CoV-2感染的有效性
导语:截至2021年10月24日,纳米比亚报告了128,868例实验室确诊的COVID-19病例和3550例死亡。2021年3月开始的全国COVID-19疫苗接种运动将卫生工作者作为优先群体。接种最多的疫苗是国药、阿斯利康、辉瑞生物科技和杨森。我们旨在衡量纳米比亚卫生工作者中COVID-19疫苗(VE)对实验室确诊的SARS-CoV-2感染的有效性。方法:采用阴性试验设计(TND)对两家主要医院的医护人员进行检测。卫生服务人员被定义为与患者有直接或间接接触的所有18岁以上的医院工作人员,有资格接种COVID-19疫苗。在2021年10月25日至2022年4月25日期间,我们使用标准化问卷对积极招募的卫生工作者进行了面对面访谈。参与者必须陈述他们的疫苗接种状况,这是通过疫苗接种卡、疫苗登记和/或地区卫生信息系统2核实的。呼吸道标本进行RT-PCR检测和血清学检测(万台、血小板elisa)。我们通过使用多变量logistic回归模型比较RT-PCR阳性和阴性HWs的疫苗接种情况来测量VE,该模型对混杂因素进行了调整。我们计算VE =(1-接种优势比)* 100%。结果:我们纳入1201名HWs,其中322名(26.8%)完全接种了COVID-19初级系列疫苗,62名(5.2%)部分接种了疫苗,735名(61.2%)未接种疫苗。总共有1119名(93%)参与者有针对SARS-CoV-2的抗体,其中包括637名(90%)未接种疫苗的参与者。58名(4.8%)参与者的SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR检测呈阳性。所有13个测序基因组(11 BA.1.18, 2 BA.1)均检测到Omicron变异。估计完全接种疫苗的总VE为61.8%(95%可信区间为9.3- 83.9%)。结论:VE结果表明,即使许多参与者在研究前感染了SARS-CoV-2,纳米比亚使用的COVID-19疫苗也能很好地保护他们免受欧米克隆变异感染。因此,COVID-19疫苗应接种给无既往感染的卫生工作者等风险群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信