Exploring the Views of Young People, Including Those With a History of Self-Harm, on the Use of Their Routinely Generated Data for Mental Health Research: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jmir Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.2196/60649
Dana Dekel, Amanda Marchant, Marcos Del Pozo Banos, Mohamed Mhereeg, Sze Chim Lee, Ann John
{"title":"Exploring the Views of Young People, Including Those With a History of Self-Harm, on the Use of Their Routinely Generated Data for Mental Health Research: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Study.","authors":"Dana Dekel, Amanda Marchant, Marcos Del Pozo Banos, Mohamed Mhereeg, Sze Chim Lee, Ann John","doi":"10.2196/60649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Secondary use of routinely collected health care data has great potential benefits in epidemiological studies primarily due to the large scale of preexisting data.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to engage respondents with and without a history of self-harm, gain insight into their views on the use of their data for research, and determine whether there were any differences in opinions between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined young people's views on the use of their routinely collected data for mental health research through a web-based survey, evaluating any differences between those with and without a history of self-harm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1765 respondents aged 16 to 24 years were included. Respondents' views were mostly positive toward the use and linkage of their data for research purposes for public benefit, particularly with regard to the use of health care data (mental health or otherwise), and generally echoed existing evidence on the opinions of older age groups. Individuals who reported a history of self-harm and subsequently contacted health services more often reported being \"extremely likely\" or \"likely\" to share mental health data (contacted: 209/609, 34.3%; 95% CI 28.0-41.2; not contacted: 169/782, 21.6%; 95% CI 15.8-28.7) and physical health data (contacted: 117/609, 19.2%; 95% CI 12.7-27.8; not contacted: 96/782, 12.3%; 95% CI 6.7-20.9) compared with those who had not contacted services. Respondents were overall less likely to want to share their social media data, which they considered to be more personal compared to their health care data. Respondents stressed the importance of anonymity and the need for an appropriate ethical framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Young people are aware, and they care about how their data are being used and for what purposes, irrespective of having a history of self-harm. They are largely positive about the use of health care data (mental or physical) for research and generally echo the opinions of older age groups raising issues around data security and the use of data for the public interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e60649"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jmir Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/60649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Secondary use of routinely collected health care data has great potential benefits in epidemiological studies primarily due to the large scale of preexisting data.

Objective: This study aimed to engage respondents with and without a history of self-harm, gain insight into their views on the use of their data for research, and determine whether there were any differences in opinions between the 2 groups.

Methods: We examined young people's views on the use of their routinely collected data for mental health research through a web-based survey, evaluating any differences between those with and without a history of self-harm.

Results: A total of 1765 respondents aged 16 to 24 years were included. Respondents' views were mostly positive toward the use and linkage of their data for research purposes for public benefit, particularly with regard to the use of health care data (mental health or otherwise), and generally echoed existing evidence on the opinions of older age groups. Individuals who reported a history of self-harm and subsequently contacted health services more often reported being "extremely likely" or "likely" to share mental health data (contacted: 209/609, 34.3%; 95% CI 28.0-41.2; not contacted: 169/782, 21.6%; 95% CI 15.8-28.7) and physical health data (contacted: 117/609, 19.2%; 95% CI 12.7-27.8; not contacted: 96/782, 12.3%; 95% CI 6.7-20.9) compared with those who had not contacted services. Respondents were overall less likely to want to share their social media data, which they considered to be more personal compared to their health care data. Respondents stressed the importance of anonymity and the need for an appropriate ethical framework.

Conclusions: Young people are aware, and they care about how their data are being used and for what purposes, irrespective of having a history of self-harm. They are largely positive about the use of health care data (mental or physical) for research and generally echo the opinions of older age groups raising issues around data security and the use of data for the public interest.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jmir Mental Health
Jmir Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
104
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Mental Health (JMH, ISSN 2368-7959) is a PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed sister journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR Mental Health focusses on digital health and Internet interventions, technologies and electronic innovations (software and hardware) for mental health, addictions, online counselling and behaviour change. This includes formative evaluation and system descriptions, theoretical papers, review papers, viewpoint/vision papers, and rigorous evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信