The principle of ne bis in idem and the European arrest warrant as vehicles for the CJEU for redefining the powers of national prosecutions in EU law.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1546825
Balázs József Gellér
{"title":"The principle of <i>ne bis in idem</i> and the European arrest warrant as vehicles for the CJEU for redefining the powers of national prosecutions in EU law.","authors":"Balázs József Gellér","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2025.1546825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article examines how the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) through its judgments enlarged the ambit of the <i>ne bis in idem</i> principle in a certain aspect and redefined attributes of national prosecutions. More poignantly, how the Court's recognition of a possible <i>res iudicata</i> effect of prosecutorial decisions binding on other EU Member States triggering <i>ne bis in idem</i> protection not only empowered national prosecutions but also implicitly pushed Member States to further harmonize their criminal justice systems. At the same time, by finding that prosecutions may not only issue European arrest warrants (EAW) but also terminate criminal proceedings with <i>res iudicata</i> consequences obligatory for other Member States initiating EU wide recognition of the termination's <i>ne bis in idem</i> force, the CJEU elevated national prosecutions-depending on domestic legal prerequisites-to the level of national courts. It is argued that by reading these judgments together, the CJEU's jurisprudence might have created frictions between the Member States' criminal justice systems and reshaped terms such as \"judicial authority\" and \"effective judicial protection\" in a way which lowers the level of protection afforded to the individual, be that, to make cooperation in criminal matters more effective between Member States.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"10 ","pages":"1546825"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1546825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines how the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) through its judgments enlarged the ambit of the ne bis in idem principle in a certain aspect and redefined attributes of national prosecutions. More poignantly, how the Court's recognition of a possible res iudicata effect of prosecutorial decisions binding on other EU Member States triggering ne bis in idem protection not only empowered national prosecutions but also implicitly pushed Member States to further harmonize their criminal justice systems. At the same time, by finding that prosecutions may not only issue European arrest warrants (EAW) but also terminate criminal proceedings with res iudicata consequences obligatory for other Member States initiating EU wide recognition of the termination's ne bis in idem force, the CJEU elevated national prosecutions-depending on domestic legal prerequisites-to the level of national courts. It is argued that by reading these judgments together, the CJEU's jurisprudence might have created frictions between the Member States' criminal justice systems and reshaped terms such as "judicial authority" and "effective judicial protection" in a way which lowers the level of protection afforded to the individual, be that, to make cooperation in criminal matters more effective between Member States.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信