The Use of Digital Technologies in Physiotherapy Higher Education: a Mixed-Methods Study.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION
Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2025-03-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.33393/aop.2025.3334
Francesca Trentini, Chiara Fante, Flavio Manganello, Marco Testa, Simone Battista
{"title":"The Use of Digital Technologies in Physiotherapy Higher Education: a Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Francesca Trentini, Chiara Fante, Flavio Manganello, Marco Testa, Simone Battista","doi":"10.33393/aop.2025.3334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies demonstrated that digital tools can be effectively integrated into physiotherapy higher education. However, their adoption remains limited. This study aimed to 1) evaluate the perceived knowledge, confidence, and frequency of digital technology use among Italian lecturers and 2) explore lecturers' experiences with digital technology in higher education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a convergent mixed-method study using an online survey instrument for Italian physiotherapy lectures. We employed a 5-point Likert to evaluate perceived knowledge, confidence, and frequency of digital technology use, with consensus defined as an agreement of ≥70% on a statement. An optional qualitative section explored lecturers' experiences with technology, which we analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June and September 2023, 118 lecturers (mean age: 45 ± 11; 69% female, n = 81) completed the survey. Participants expressed confidence in utilizing digital tools such as videoconferencing (95%), online repositories (88%), and communication apps (78%). On average, 32% reported using technologies \"often\" or \"always.\" In the qualitative section, completed by 77 participants, we generated three themes: 1) \"Technology can promote a constructive educational approach\"; 2) \"Action of technologies on students' learning process,\" with mixed results on their impact; and 3) \"Technology is not within everyone's reach,\" due to barriers to its implementation in didactics. Qualitative and quantitative findings confirmed one another, allowing for a deeper understanding of digital technologies among Italian physiotherapy lecturers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that digital tools are still underutilized among Italian physiotherapy lecturers. The main barriers include inadequate infrastructure and a lack of digital competencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"15 ","pages":"49-58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2025.3334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies demonstrated that digital tools can be effectively integrated into physiotherapy higher education. However, their adoption remains limited. This study aimed to 1) evaluate the perceived knowledge, confidence, and frequency of digital technology use among Italian lecturers and 2) explore lecturers' experiences with digital technology in higher education.

Methods: We performed a convergent mixed-method study using an online survey instrument for Italian physiotherapy lectures. We employed a 5-point Likert to evaluate perceived knowledge, confidence, and frequency of digital technology use, with consensus defined as an agreement of ≥70% on a statement. An optional qualitative section explored lecturers' experiences with technology, which we analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.

Results: Between June and September 2023, 118 lecturers (mean age: 45 ± 11; 69% female, n = 81) completed the survey. Participants expressed confidence in utilizing digital tools such as videoconferencing (95%), online repositories (88%), and communication apps (78%). On average, 32% reported using technologies "often" or "always." In the qualitative section, completed by 77 participants, we generated three themes: 1) "Technology can promote a constructive educational approach"; 2) "Action of technologies on students' learning process," with mixed results on their impact; and 3) "Technology is not within everyone's reach," due to barriers to its implementation in didactics. Qualitative and quantitative findings confirmed one another, allowing for a deeper understanding of digital technologies among Italian physiotherapy lecturers.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that digital tools are still underutilized among Italian physiotherapy lecturers. The main barriers include inadequate infrastructure and a lack of digital competencies.

数字技术在物理治疗高等教育中的应用:一项混合方法研究。
背景:以往的研究表明,数字化工具可以有效地融入物理治疗高等教育。然而,它们的采用仍然有限。本研究旨在1)评估意大利讲师对数字技术使用的认知、信心和频率;2)探索讲师在高等教育中使用数字技术的经验。方法:我们使用在线调查工具对意大利物理治疗讲座进行融合混合方法研究。我们采用5点李克特量表来评估感知知识、信心和数字技术使用频率,共识定义为对陈述的同意度≥70%。一个可选的定性部分探讨了讲师使用技术的经验,我们使用反身性主题分析进行了分析。结果:2023年6 - 9月,共118名讲师,平均年龄45±11岁;69%的女性(n = 81)完成了调查。参与者表示对使用视频会议(95%)、在线存储库(88%)和通信应用程序(78%)等数字工具有信心。平均而言,32%的人表示“经常”或“总是”使用技术。在由77名参与者完成的定性部分,我们产生了三个主题:1)“技术可以促进建设性的教育方法”;2)“技术对学生学习过程的作用”,其影响好坏参半;和3)由于在教学中实施技术的障碍,“技术不是每个人都能接触到的”。定性和定量研究结果相互证实,使意大利物理治疗讲师对数字技术有了更深入的了解。结论:我们的研究结果表明,数字工具在意大利物理治疗讲师中仍未得到充分利用。主要障碍包括基础设施不足和缺乏数字能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信