Reliability of Hip and Shoulder Measurements Assessed via Telehealth Versus a Standard In-Person Visit Modality.

Q2 Social Sciences
The Permanente journal Pub Date : 2025-06-16 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.7812/TPP/24.167
Erin Nicholas, Campbell Goldsmith, Audrey Wimberly, Jennifer Cheng, Alexander Shafiro, Peter Moley
{"title":"Reliability of Hip and Shoulder Measurements Assessed via Telehealth Versus a Standard In-Person Visit Modality.","authors":"Erin Nicholas, Campbell Goldsmith, Audrey Wimberly, Jennifer Cheng, Alexander Shafiro, Peter Moley","doi":"10.7812/TPP/24.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Restricted in-person interaction throughout the pandemic coincided with increased reliance on telehealth for patient evaluation and treatment. However, few studies have investigated telehealth efficacy and accuracy compared with in-person musculoskeletal physical examination. Importantly, this virtual platform can be challenging for practitioners whose care relies on physical examination measurements. This study evaluated the validity and accuracy of measuring hip and shoulder strength and range of motion (ROM) via telehealth examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 45 participants without hip or shoulder pain underwent an in-person physical examination and a telehealth examination. Hip and shoulder ROM were measured from in-person and telehealth examinations, using Halo goniometers (Halo Medical Devices) and virtual goniometers, respectively. Hip and shoulder strength were also assessed. Measures obtained from in-person and telehealth examinations were compared, and percent agreements were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 32.0 ± 7.2 years; 67% (n = 30) were female. Hip flexion strength, right hip abduction, and right shoulder strength had the strongest percent agreement (91.1%-100.0%) across in-person and telehealth modalities. Left hip abduction, left shoulder active abduction, shoulder internal ROM, and shoulder external ROM showed moderate-to-high agreement (26.7%-77.8%). Left (2.2%) and right hip (8.9%) external ROM showed poor agreement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Measurements with the greatest agreement between telehealth and in-person examinations included hip flexion, shoulder strength, hip abduction, and shoulder active abduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Certain strength and ROM tests can be accurately assessed via telehealth examination. Future research is needed to expand upon these findings and to develop a reliable, standardized protocol for the telehealth musculoskeletal physical examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"12-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/24.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Restricted in-person interaction throughout the pandemic coincided with increased reliance on telehealth for patient evaluation and treatment. However, few studies have investigated telehealth efficacy and accuracy compared with in-person musculoskeletal physical examination. Importantly, this virtual platform can be challenging for practitioners whose care relies on physical examination measurements. This study evaluated the validity and accuracy of measuring hip and shoulder strength and range of motion (ROM) via telehealth examination.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 45 participants without hip or shoulder pain underwent an in-person physical examination and a telehealth examination. Hip and shoulder ROM were measured from in-person and telehealth examinations, using Halo goniometers (Halo Medical Devices) and virtual goniometers, respectively. Hip and shoulder strength were also assessed. Measures obtained from in-person and telehealth examinations were compared, and percent agreements were calculated.

Results: The mean age of participants was 32.0 ± 7.2 years; 67% (n = 30) were female. Hip flexion strength, right hip abduction, and right shoulder strength had the strongest percent agreement (91.1%-100.0%) across in-person and telehealth modalities. Left hip abduction, left shoulder active abduction, shoulder internal ROM, and shoulder external ROM showed moderate-to-high agreement (26.7%-77.8%). Left (2.2%) and right hip (8.9%) external ROM showed poor agreement.

Discussion: Measurements with the greatest agreement between telehealth and in-person examinations included hip flexion, shoulder strength, hip abduction, and shoulder active abduction.

Conclusion: Certain strength and ROM tests can be accurately assessed via telehealth examination. Future research is needed to expand upon these findings and to develop a reliable, standardized protocol for the telehealth musculoskeletal physical examination.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过远程医疗评估髋关节和肩部测量的可靠性与标准的面对面访问方式。
导言:在整个大流行期间,面对面互动受到限制,与此同时,越来越多地依赖远程医疗对患者进行评估和治疗。然而,很少有研究将远程医疗的有效性和准确性与面对面的肌肉骨骼体检进行比较。重要的是,这个虚拟平台对于依赖于身体检查测量的从业者来说可能是一个挑战。本研究评估了通过远程健康检查测量髋关节和肩部力量和活动范围(ROM)的有效性和准确性。方法:在这项横断面研究中,45名没有髋关节或肩部疼痛的参与者接受了面对面的身体检查和远程健康检查。髋关节和肩部ROM分别通过面对面和远程健康检查测量,分别使用Halo测角仪和虚拟测角仪。髋部和肩部的力量也被评估。比较现场和远程健康检查所获得的措施,并计算一致性百分比。结果:参与者平均年龄为32.0±7.2岁;67% (n = 30)为女性。髋关节屈曲强度、右髋关节外展强度和右肩强度在面对面和远程医疗模式中具有最强的一致性(91.1%-100.0%)。左髋关节外展、左肩关节主动外展、肩关节内ROM和肩关节外ROM表现出中度至高度的一致性(26.7%-77.8%)。左侧(2.2%)和右侧髋关节(8.9%)外置ROM的一致性较差。讨论:远程医疗和现场检查最一致的测量包括髋关节屈曲、肩部力量、髋关节外展和肩部主动外展。结论:远程健康检查可准确评估某些强度和ROM指标。未来的研究需要在这些发现的基础上进行扩展,并为远程健康肌肉骨骼体检制定一个可靠的、标准化的协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信