LDL cholesterol levels and treatment intensity in secondary prevention of patients with ischemic heart disease in the primary care setting: a real-world data registry study.
Núria Sánchez-Ruano, Anna Fibla-Matamoros, Carles Falces, Encarna Sánchez, Antoni Sisó-Almirall, Luis González de Paz
{"title":"LDL cholesterol levels and treatment intensity in secondary prevention of patients with ischemic heart disease in the primary care setting: a real-world data registry study.","authors":"Núria Sánchez-Ruano, Anna Fibla-Matamoros, Carles Falces, Encarna Sánchez, Antoni Sisó-Almirall, Luis González de Paz","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitoring LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and prescribing appropriate treatment is crucial for secondary prevention in primary care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We studied LDL-C levels and treatments for ischemic heart disease patients according to target recommendations and assessed factors influencing prescribed drug intensity.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>We examined electronic health records of patients with ischemic heart disease from three primary care centers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>LDL-C levels were assessed using the most recent registry, and LDL-C-lowering treatments were categorized by their theoretical efficacy. Factors associated with LDL-C target attainment were analyzed using univariate and multivariate regression models. Prescription intensity was studied with ordinal logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 1,936 patients, 14.88% of whom received no LDL-C-lowering treatment. The percentages of patients who achieved LDL-C thresholds of<70 mg/dL and<55 mg/dL were 35.0% and 12.6%, respectively. The factor associated with the<55 mg/dL threshold was type 2 diabetes mellitus (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.42; 0.73), with men showing better LDL-C levels (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23; 0.51). Men had higher-intensity prescriptions (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.27; 1.94), and older patients had lower-intensity treatments (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95; 0.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased LDL-C drug treatment improvement, monitoring, and adherence to guideline recommendations are necessary for patients with ischemic heart disease. Sex and age are potential factors associated with inadequate lipid-lowering treatment intensity and poor LDL-C control, might worsen cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients, leading to avoidable inequity among patients who visit the primary health setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Monitoring LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and prescribing appropriate treatment is crucial for secondary prevention in primary care.
Aim: We studied LDL-C levels and treatments for ischemic heart disease patients according to target recommendations and assessed factors influencing prescribed drug intensity.
Design & setting: We examined electronic health records of patients with ischemic heart disease from three primary care centers.
Method: LDL-C levels were assessed using the most recent registry, and LDL-C-lowering treatments were categorized by their theoretical efficacy. Factors associated with LDL-C target attainment were analyzed using univariate and multivariate regression models. Prescription intensity was studied with ordinal logistic regression models.
Results: We studied 1,936 patients, 14.88% of whom received no LDL-C-lowering treatment. The percentages of patients who achieved LDL-C thresholds of<70 mg/dL and<55 mg/dL were 35.0% and 12.6%, respectively. The factor associated with the<55 mg/dL threshold was type 2 diabetes mellitus (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.42; 0.73), with men showing better LDL-C levels (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23; 0.51). Men had higher-intensity prescriptions (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.27; 1.94), and older patients had lower-intensity treatments (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95; 0.97).
Conclusion: Increased LDL-C drug treatment improvement, monitoring, and adherence to guideline recommendations are necessary for patients with ischemic heart disease. Sex and age are potential factors associated with inadequate lipid-lowering treatment intensity and poor LDL-C control, might worsen cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients, leading to avoidable inequity among patients who visit the primary health setting.