Validation of Parental Reports in Assessing Idiopathic Toe Walking Using Quantitative In-Shoe Device Measurements.

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Logan Morrison, Susan Sienko, Mark McMulkin, Bruce MacWilliams, Jon Davids, Paige Lemhouse, Jeremy Bauer
{"title":"Validation of Parental Reports in Assessing Idiopathic Toe Walking Using Quantitative In-Shoe Device Measurements.","authors":"Logan Morrison, Susan Sienko, Mark McMulkin, Bruce MacWilliams, Jon Davids, Paige Lemhouse, Jeremy Bauer","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Toe walking is prevalent among children, affecting 5% to 24% of the pediatric population. Clinicians rely on parental reports of frequency of toe walking to guide clinical decision making and outcomes assessment. However, recall accuracy and differing environments challenge the reliability of parental reports. This study aims to validate parental reports against quantitative in-shoe device measurements (NURVV/RUN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty children with persistent idiopathic toe walking (ITWp) (mean age: 9.6y; 13 males, 7 females) from 8 pediatric orthopaedic specialty care sites participated in this multicenter study. Parents assessed toe walking frequency using a 6-point scale, while children wore NURVV/RUN insoles for 8 hours/day over 7 days. Insole sensors recorded foot strike patterns (rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot), which were classified using the same severity scale. Agreement between parental reports and NURVV data was assessed using weighted Kappa statistics (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before intervention, children with ITWp exhibited daily walking patterns: 61.7% forefoot, 15.3% midfoot, and 22.8% hindfoot contact. Agreement analysis showed substantial agreement (k=0.688, P<0.001) for combined forefoot and midfoot contacts and fair agreement (k=0.381, P<0.005) for isolated forefoot contact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parental reports of toe walking prevalence in their children are relatively accurate, supporting their use in clinical management. However, quantitative in-shoe devices provide a more objective and quantitative understanding of ITWp frequency and have the potential to guide clinical decision-making and outcomes assessment children with ITWp.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II-diagnostic study. See instructions to authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002950","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Toe walking is prevalent among children, affecting 5% to 24% of the pediatric population. Clinicians rely on parental reports of frequency of toe walking to guide clinical decision making and outcomes assessment. However, recall accuracy and differing environments challenge the reliability of parental reports. This study aims to validate parental reports against quantitative in-shoe device measurements (NURVV/RUN).

Methods: Twenty children with persistent idiopathic toe walking (ITWp) (mean age: 9.6y; 13 males, 7 females) from 8 pediatric orthopaedic specialty care sites participated in this multicenter study. Parents assessed toe walking frequency using a 6-point scale, while children wore NURVV/RUN insoles for 8 hours/day over 7 days. Insole sensors recorded foot strike patterns (rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot), which were classified using the same severity scale. Agreement between parental reports and NURVV data was assessed using weighted Kappa statistics (P<0.05).

Results: Before intervention, children with ITWp exhibited daily walking patterns: 61.7% forefoot, 15.3% midfoot, and 22.8% hindfoot contact. Agreement analysis showed substantial agreement (k=0.688, P<0.001) for combined forefoot and midfoot contacts and fair agreement (k=0.381, P<0.005) for isolated forefoot contact.

Conclusion: Parental reports of toe walking prevalence in their children are relatively accurate, supporting their use in clinical management. However, quantitative in-shoe devices provide a more objective and quantitative understanding of ITWp frequency and have the potential to guide clinical decision-making and outcomes assessment children with ITWp.

Level of evidence: Level II-diagnostic study. See instructions to authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

使用定量鞋内装置测量评估特发性脚趾行走的父母报告的验证。
背景:足趾行走在儿童中很普遍,影响了5%至24%的儿科人口。临床医生依靠父母报告的脚趾行走频率来指导临床决策和结果评估。然而,回忆的准确性和不同的环境挑战了父母报告的可靠性。本研究旨在验证父母报告与定量鞋内装置测量(NURVV/RUN)。方法:20例持续性特发性脚趾行走(ITWp)患儿(平均年龄:9.6y;来自8个儿科骨科专科医院的13名男性,7名女性参与了这项多中心研究。父母使用6分制评估脚趾行走频率,而儿童在7天内每天穿着NURVV/RUN鞋垫8小时。鞋垫传感器记录足部撞击模式(后足、中足和前足),并使用相同的严重程度量表进行分类。采用加权Kappa统计评估父母报告和NURVV数据之间的一致性(结果:干预前,ITWp儿童表现出日常步行模式:61.7%的前足接触,15.3%的中足接触,22.8%的后足接触。结论:家长报告的儿童足趾行走发生率相对准确,支持其在临床管理中的应用。然而,定量鞋内装置提供了对ITWp频率更客观和定量的了解,并有可能指导ITWp患儿的临床决策和结局评估。证据等级:ii级诊断性研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者的说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信