Andrea Duca, Laura Frosio, Luca Molinero, Andrea Finazzi, Ivan Oppedisano, Carlo Bellazzi, Giovanni Nattino, Fabiola Signorini, Guido Bertolini, Eugenia Belotti, Roberto Cosentini
{"title":"Does helmet CPAP reduce carotid flow compared to oronasal mask CPAP? A randomized cross-over trial in healthy subjects.","authors":"Andrea Duca, Laura Frosio, Luca Molinero, Andrea Finazzi, Ivan Oppedisano, Carlo Bellazzi, Giovanni Nattino, Fabiola Signorini, Guido Bertolini, Eugenia Belotti, Roberto Cosentini","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-03914-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess whether delivering Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) through a Helmet interface (H-CPAP) reduces common carotid artery flow (CCAF), compared to breathing room air (RA) or using an oronasal mask (M-CPAP). This trial is an unblinded, randomized, controlled crossover trial. The primary outcome was CCAF, measured using Doppler ultrasound. The secondary outcome was mean arterial pressure (MAP). A convenient sample of adult healthy volunteers was enrolled. Subjects were enrolled and randomized to receive either H-CPAP or M-CPAP first at + 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, followed by the alternate intervention, each for 5 min. CCAF, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO₂), and anxiety score (AS) were recorded at baseline (RA) and after 5 min under each CPAP condition. Results showed a significant 14% reduction in CCAF between RA and H-CPAP (p = 0.001) and a 13% reduction between M-CPAP and H-CPAP (p = 0.004), with no significant difference between RA and M-CPAP. MAP remained unchanged across treatments, suggesting that the reduction in cerebral perfusion observed with H-CPAP was independent of systemic blood pressure changes. Helmet CPAP significantly reduces CCAF compared to RA and M-CPAP. While H-CPAP may offer advantages in respiratory support, its effect on cerebral perfusion suggests caution in patients with impaired cerebral autoregulation, such as those with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-03914-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to assess whether delivering Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) through a Helmet interface (H-CPAP) reduces common carotid artery flow (CCAF), compared to breathing room air (RA) or using an oronasal mask (M-CPAP). This trial is an unblinded, randomized, controlled crossover trial. The primary outcome was CCAF, measured using Doppler ultrasound. The secondary outcome was mean arterial pressure (MAP). A convenient sample of adult healthy volunteers was enrolled. Subjects were enrolled and randomized to receive either H-CPAP or M-CPAP first at + 10 cmH2O, followed by the alternate intervention, each for 5 min. CCAF, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO₂), and anxiety score (AS) were recorded at baseline (RA) and after 5 min under each CPAP condition. Results showed a significant 14% reduction in CCAF between RA and H-CPAP (p = 0.001) and a 13% reduction between M-CPAP and H-CPAP (p = 0.004), with no significant difference between RA and M-CPAP. MAP remained unchanged across treatments, suggesting that the reduction in cerebral perfusion observed with H-CPAP was independent of systemic blood pressure changes. Helmet CPAP significantly reduces CCAF compared to RA and M-CPAP. While H-CPAP may offer advantages in respiratory support, its effect on cerebral perfusion suggests caution in patients with impaired cerebral autoregulation, such as those with stroke.
期刊介绍:
Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.