Does helmet CPAP reduce carotid flow compared to oronasal mask CPAP? A randomized cross-over trial in healthy subjects.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Andrea Duca, Laura Frosio, Luca Molinero, Andrea Finazzi, Ivan Oppedisano, Carlo Bellazzi, Giovanni Nattino, Fabiola Signorini, Guido Bertolini, Eugenia Belotti, Roberto Cosentini
{"title":"Does helmet CPAP reduce carotid flow compared to oronasal mask CPAP? A randomized cross-over trial in healthy subjects.","authors":"Andrea Duca, Laura Frosio, Luca Molinero, Andrea Finazzi, Ivan Oppedisano, Carlo Bellazzi, Giovanni Nattino, Fabiola Signorini, Guido Bertolini, Eugenia Belotti, Roberto Cosentini","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-03914-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess whether delivering Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) through a Helmet interface (H-CPAP) reduces common carotid artery flow (CCAF), compared to breathing room air (RA) or using an oronasal mask (M-CPAP). This trial is an unblinded, randomized, controlled crossover trial. The primary outcome was CCAF, measured using Doppler ultrasound. The secondary outcome was mean arterial pressure (MAP). A convenient sample of adult healthy volunteers was enrolled. Subjects were enrolled and randomized to receive either H-CPAP or M-CPAP first at + 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, followed by the alternate intervention, each for 5 min. CCAF, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO₂), and anxiety score (AS) were recorded at baseline (RA) and after 5 min under each CPAP condition. Results showed a significant 14% reduction in CCAF between RA and H-CPAP (p = 0.001) and a 13% reduction between M-CPAP and H-CPAP (p = 0.004), with no significant difference between RA and M-CPAP. MAP remained unchanged across treatments, suggesting that the reduction in cerebral perfusion observed with H-CPAP was independent of systemic blood pressure changes. Helmet CPAP significantly reduces CCAF compared to RA and M-CPAP. While H-CPAP may offer advantages in respiratory support, its effect on cerebral perfusion suggests caution in patients with impaired cerebral autoregulation, such as those with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-03914-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to assess whether delivering Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) through a Helmet interface (H-CPAP) reduces common carotid artery flow (CCAF), compared to breathing room air (RA) or using an oronasal mask (M-CPAP). This trial is an unblinded, randomized, controlled crossover trial. The primary outcome was CCAF, measured using Doppler ultrasound. The secondary outcome was mean arterial pressure (MAP). A convenient sample of adult healthy volunteers was enrolled. Subjects were enrolled and randomized to receive either H-CPAP or M-CPAP first at + 10 cmH2O, followed by the alternate intervention, each for 5 min. CCAF, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO₂), and anxiety score (AS) were recorded at baseline (RA) and after 5 min under each CPAP condition. Results showed a significant 14% reduction in CCAF between RA and H-CPAP (p = 0.001) and a 13% reduction between M-CPAP and H-CPAP (p = 0.004), with no significant difference between RA and M-CPAP. MAP remained unchanged across treatments, suggesting that the reduction in cerebral perfusion observed with H-CPAP was independent of systemic blood pressure changes. Helmet CPAP significantly reduces CCAF compared to RA and M-CPAP. While H-CPAP may offer advantages in respiratory support, its effect on cerebral perfusion suggests caution in patients with impaired cerebral autoregulation, such as those with stroke.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信