{"title":"Regulating pH distribution of soda saline-alkali soil during electrochemical treatment by conditioning catholyte pH coupled with approaching anodes.","authors":"Yinyin Zhang, Jiangtao Han, Changhui Luan, Yuyan Zhao, Sheng Xu, Qiaoqiao Wei, Libin Zang","doi":"10.1007/s10653-025-02420-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soda saline-alkali soils pose significant challenges to agricultural productivity due to high pH and excessive sodium content. This study investigated the removal of excess salts in soda saline-alkali soil through electrochemical treatment (ECT). Traditional ECT often led to uneven soil pH distribution, with acidic conditions near the anode and alkaline conditions near the cathode, which limited its effectiveness for soil improvement. We explored the impact of conditioning the catholyte pH coupled with approaching anode electrochemical treatment (AA-ECT) on soil pH distribution and the removal of soluble sodium ions in soda saline-alkali soil. The results demonstrated that AA-ECT was less effective than fixed anode electrochemical treatment (FA-ECT) in regulating soil pH, achieving a relatively uniform pH range of 7.31-8.44. Adding acetic acid further improved pH uniformity, narrowing the range to 7.32-8.02. Moreover, all experimental groups exhibited high removal of soluble sodium ions efficiency, and the acetic acid coupled with AA-ECT achieved an average removal efficiency of 91.90%. Notably, the soil was successfully transformed from severely alkali soil (exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) > 61%) to non-alkali soil (ESP < 14%). Additionally, the AA-ECT groups showed lower energy consumption than the FA-ECT groups. These findings highlighted that conditioning the catholyte pH coupled with AA-ECT was a highly effective strategy for improving soda saline-alkali soils, offering a sustainable solution for soil remediation and agricultural productivity enhancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":11759,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","volume":"47 4","pages":"111"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-025-02420-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Soda saline-alkali soils pose significant challenges to agricultural productivity due to high pH and excessive sodium content. This study investigated the removal of excess salts in soda saline-alkali soil through electrochemical treatment (ECT). Traditional ECT often led to uneven soil pH distribution, with acidic conditions near the anode and alkaline conditions near the cathode, which limited its effectiveness for soil improvement. We explored the impact of conditioning the catholyte pH coupled with approaching anode electrochemical treatment (AA-ECT) on soil pH distribution and the removal of soluble sodium ions in soda saline-alkali soil. The results demonstrated that AA-ECT was less effective than fixed anode electrochemical treatment (FA-ECT) in regulating soil pH, achieving a relatively uniform pH range of 7.31-8.44. Adding acetic acid further improved pH uniformity, narrowing the range to 7.32-8.02. Moreover, all experimental groups exhibited high removal of soluble sodium ions efficiency, and the acetic acid coupled with AA-ECT achieved an average removal efficiency of 91.90%. Notably, the soil was successfully transformed from severely alkali soil (exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) > 61%) to non-alkali soil (ESP < 14%). Additionally, the AA-ECT groups showed lower energy consumption than the FA-ECT groups. These findings highlighted that conditioning the catholyte pH coupled with AA-ECT was a highly effective strategy for improving soda saline-alkali soils, offering a sustainable solution for soil remediation and agricultural productivity enhancement.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health publishes original research papers and review papers across the broad field of environmental geochemistry. Environmental geochemistry and health establishes and explains links between the natural or disturbed chemical composition of the earth’s surface and the health of plants, animals and people.
Beneficial elements regulate or promote enzymatic and hormonal activity whereas other elements may be toxic. Bedrock geochemistry controls the composition of soil and hence that of water and vegetation. Environmental issues, such as pollution, arising from the extraction and use of mineral resources, are discussed. The effects of contaminants introduced into the earth’s geochemical systems are examined. Geochemical surveys of soil, water and plants show how major and trace elements are distributed geographically. Associated epidemiological studies reveal the possibility of causal links between the natural or disturbed geochemical environment and disease. Experimental research illuminates the nature or consequences of natural or disturbed geochemical processes.
The journal particularly welcomes novel research linking environmental geochemistry and health issues on such topics as: heavy metals (including mercury), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and mixed chemicals emitted through human activities, such as uncontrolled recycling of electronic-waste; waste recycling; surface-atmospheric interaction processes (natural and anthropogenic emissions, vertical transport, deposition, and physical-chemical interaction) of gases and aerosols; phytoremediation/restoration of contaminated sites; food contamination and safety; environmental effects of medicines; effects and toxicity of mixed pollutants; speciation of heavy metals/metalloids; effects of mining; disturbed geochemistry from human behavior, natural or man-made hazards; particle and nanoparticle toxicology; risk and the vulnerability of populations, etc.