Comparison of the effectiveness of two different concentrations of ropivacaine for intrapleural analgesia in reducing stimulatory pain caused by chest tubes after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomised controlled study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Wenjing Tang, Yonggang Hao, Gangming Wu, Haixia Wang
{"title":"Comparison of the effectiveness of two different concentrations of ropivacaine for intrapleural analgesia in reducing stimulatory pain caused by chest tubes after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomised controlled study.","authors":"Wenjing Tang, Yonggang Hao, Gangming Wu, Haixia Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02992-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain caused by chest tube placed after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UVATS) is often neglected. Ropivacaine can be used to alleviate pain related to the chest tube, but the current lowest effective concentration of ropivacaine remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To investigate the analgesic effect of administering two different concentrations of ropivacaine into the pleural cavity via pleural drainage tube bypass after UVATS. Ninety patients were randomly divided into three groups: Control group (PCIA only), Low-dose group (PCIA combined with intrathoracic infusion of 200 ml 0.25% ropivacaine), Medium-dose group (PCIA combined with intrathoracic infusion of 200 ml 0.5% ropivacaine). The analysis included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for chest tube-related pain and surgical incision pain at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h post-operation for each group. Compare incidence of adverse reactions (respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea/vomiting, arrhythmia, dizziness) within 48 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the control group, both 0.25% and 0.50% ropivacaine effectively reduced chest tube-related pain (P < 0.001) and surgical incision pain (P < 0.001) at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h postoperatively. However, no significant differences were observed between the two concentrations of ropivacaine in alleviating rest and cough pain related to the chest tube (P > 0.05) or surgical incision (P > 0.05) within 48 h postoperatively. Adverse reaction rates were similar among groups within 48 h postoperatively (P = 0.383).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analgesic effect of ropivacaine infusion with concentrations of 0.25% and 0.50% administered via intrathoracic pumps for chest tube-related pain after UVATS showed no significant difference, but both were superior to the sole use of PCIA.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200065184.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11899763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02992-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain caused by chest tube placed after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UVATS) is often neglected. Ropivacaine can be used to alleviate pain related to the chest tube, but the current lowest effective concentration of ropivacaine remains unclear.

Methods: To investigate the analgesic effect of administering two different concentrations of ropivacaine into the pleural cavity via pleural drainage tube bypass after UVATS. Ninety patients were randomly divided into three groups: Control group (PCIA only), Low-dose group (PCIA combined with intrathoracic infusion of 200 ml 0.25% ropivacaine), Medium-dose group (PCIA combined with intrathoracic infusion of 200 ml 0.5% ropivacaine). The analysis included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for chest tube-related pain and surgical incision pain at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h post-operation for each group. Compare incidence of adverse reactions (respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea/vomiting, arrhythmia, dizziness) within 48 h.

Results: Compared to the control group, both 0.25% and 0.50% ropivacaine effectively reduced chest tube-related pain (P < 0.001) and surgical incision pain (P < 0.001) at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h postoperatively. However, no significant differences were observed between the two concentrations of ropivacaine in alleviating rest and cough pain related to the chest tube (P > 0.05) or surgical incision (P > 0.05) within 48 h postoperatively. Adverse reaction rates were similar among groups within 48 h postoperatively (P = 0.383).

Conclusion: The analgesic effect of ropivacaine infusion with concentrations of 0.25% and 0.50% administered via intrathoracic pumps for chest tube-related pain after UVATS showed no significant difference, but both were superior to the sole use of PCIA.

Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200065184.

两种不同浓度的罗哌卡因胸腔内镇痛对减轻单门胸腔镜手术后胸管引起的刺激性疼痛的有效性比较:一项随机对照研究。
背景:单门胸腔镜手术(UVATS)后置入胸管引起的疼痛常常被忽视。罗哌卡因可用于减轻与胸管有关的疼痛,但目前罗哌卡因的最低有效浓度尚不清楚。方法:观察两种不同浓度的罗哌卡因经胸腔引流管旁路注入胸腔后的镇痛效果。90例患者随机分为3组:对照组(仅PCIA)、低剂量组(PCIA联合胸内注射0.25%罗哌卡因200 ml)、中剂量组(PCIA联合胸内注射0.5%罗哌卡因200 ml)。分析各组术后6 h、12 h、24 h和48 h胸管相关疼痛和手术切口疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。48 h内不良反应(呼吸抑制、低血压、恶心/呕吐、心律失常、头晕)发生率的比较结果:与对照组相比,0.25%和0.50%罗哌卡因术后48 h内可有效减轻胸管相关疼痛(P 0.05)或手术切口(P > 0.05)。两组术后48 h内不良反应发生率相似(P = 0.383)。结论:0.25%浓度的罗哌卡因与0.50%浓度的罗哌卡因经胸腔内泵注对UVATS术后胸管相关性疼痛的镇痛效果无显著差异,但均优于单独使用PCIA。注册:中国临床试验注册中心ChiCTR2200065184。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信