Walking travel satisfaction – A comparison of three European cities

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Katrin Lättman , Janina Welsch , Noriko Otsuka , Anna-Lena van der Vlugt , Jonas De Vos , Edward Prichard
{"title":"Walking travel satisfaction – A comparison of three European cities","authors":"Katrin Lättman ,&nbsp;Janina Welsch ,&nbsp;Noriko Otsuka ,&nbsp;Anna-Lena van der Vlugt ,&nbsp;Jonas De Vos ,&nbsp;Edward Prichard","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examined and compared walking satisfaction in three case study cities in Europe: Dortmund, Genoa, and Gothenburg as part of an EU project. By analyzing household survey data, we explored levels and determinants of walking satisfaction within and between the cities, using the Satisfaction with Travel Scale to measure walking satisfaction. The results show that levels of walking satisfaction differ between the cities, both overall and in terms of its sub-dimensions positive activation, deactivation and cognitive evaluation. This implies that different experiences are present when walking in different contexts. We also found that different factors influence walking satisfaction in different contexts. Accessibility and the social setting, in terms of walking in company or not, are important for walking satisfaction in all contexts. On city level, several differences in determinants were detected. These findings point at the importance of contextual settings in evaluations of walking satisfaction. In all three cities, we also found that walking satisfaction was significantly higher for trips which allow more flexibility, such as leisure or recreational walking, than for trips with a set destination. The findings expand the existing body of knowledge about determinants of walking satisfaction in different urban settings and provides vital insights for urban planning and policies determined to foster walking-friendly and satisfactory local urban environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined and compared walking satisfaction in three case study cities in Europe: Dortmund, Genoa, and Gothenburg as part of an EU project. By analyzing household survey data, we explored levels and determinants of walking satisfaction within and between the cities, using the Satisfaction with Travel Scale to measure walking satisfaction. The results show that levels of walking satisfaction differ between the cities, both overall and in terms of its sub-dimensions positive activation, deactivation and cognitive evaluation. This implies that different experiences are present when walking in different contexts. We also found that different factors influence walking satisfaction in different contexts. Accessibility and the social setting, in terms of walking in company or not, are important for walking satisfaction in all contexts. On city level, several differences in determinants were detected. These findings point at the importance of contextual settings in evaluations of walking satisfaction. In all three cities, we also found that walking satisfaction was significantly higher for trips which allow more flexibility, such as leisure or recreational walking, than for trips with a set destination. The findings expand the existing body of knowledge about determinants of walking satisfaction in different urban settings and provides vital insights for urban planning and policies determined to foster walking-friendly and satisfactory local urban environments.
徒步旅行满意度——三个欧洲城市的比较
作为欧盟项目的一部分,这项研究调查并比较了欧洲三个案例研究城市的步行满意度:多特蒙德、热那亚和哥德堡。通过对住户调查数据的分析,我们探讨了城市内部和城市之间步行满意度的水平和决定因素,使用旅行满意度量表来衡量步行满意度。结果表明,不同城市的步行满意度水平存在差异,无论是总体水平还是其子维度积极激活、失活和认知评价。这意味着在不同的环境中行走会产生不同的体验。我们还发现,在不同的环境中,不同的因素会影响步行满意度。可达性和社交环境,就是否有同伴行走而言,对所有情况下的行走满意度都很重要。在城市层面上,发现了几个决定因素的差异。这些发现指出了环境设置在评估步行满意度中的重要性。在这三个城市中,我们还发现,与目的地固定的旅行相比,休闲或娱乐步行等灵活性更强的旅行对步行的满意度明显更高。研究结果扩展了现有的关于不同城市环境中步行满意度决定因素的知识体系,并为城市规划和政策提供了重要的见解,这些政策旨在促进步行友好和令人满意的当地城市环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信