{"title":"Centering Pacific knowledge of time, space, and relationality in community-based translanguaging research: An engaged and fluid temporal methodology","authors":"Honiara Amosa , Sam Amosa , Corinne A. Seals","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In Western perspectives, space and place are often viewed as distinct concepts. Place refers to a specific physical location, whereas space describes the interactions that take place within that location. Time is typically understood as a fixed moment or the interval between moments. In contrast, Pacific perspectives see time, space, and place as interconnected with each other and with individuals. In this worldview, a space or place continues to resonate even after one leaves it, and time is seen as circular rather than linear, linking the past, present, and future. This interconnectedness is embodied in the concept of 'va', which emphasizes the importance of understanding relationships and responsibilities within the community involved in research (cf. Airini et al., 2010). This article argues for the importance of recognizing Indigenous epistemologies and ontologies as valid in their own right, which in this case means recognizing the importance of va in Pacific research. We also present our theorization of an Engaged and Fluid Temporal Methodology, which outlines via five principles how Pacific understandings guided our work with Pacific communities. We then walk through each of the five principles as a methodological guide for community-based research, providing illustrative examples from the Wellington Translanguaging Project. By focusing on principles to research that are imbued with respective Pacific understandings of time, space, and relationships (e.g. va), we argue that this supports the research to remain in and for the communities with which we worked, a core component of Indigenous research methodology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766125000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In Western perspectives, space and place are often viewed as distinct concepts. Place refers to a specific physical location, whereas space describes the interactions that take place within that location. Time is typically understood as a fixed moment or the interval between moments. In contrast, Pacific perspectives see time, space, and place as interconnected with each other and with individuals. In this worldview, a space or place continues to resonate even after one leaves it, and time is seen as circular rather than linear, linking the past, present, and future. This interconnectedness is embodied in the concept of 'va', which emphasizes the importance of understanding relationships and responsibilities within the community involved in research (cf. Airini et al., 2010). This article argues for the importance of recognizing Indigenous epistemologies and ontologies as valid in their own right, which in this case means recognizing the importance of va in Pacific research. We also present our theorization of an Engaged and Fluid Temporal Methodology, which outlines via five principles how Pacific understandings guided our work with Pacific communities. We then walk through each of the five principles as a methodological guide for community-based research, providing illustrative examples from the Wellington Translanguaging Project. By focusing on principles to research that are imbued with respective Pacific understandings of time, space, and relationships (e.g. va), we argue that this supports the research to remain in and for the communities with which we worked, a core component of Indigenous research methodology.
在西方的观点中,空间和地点通常被视为不同的概念。地点指的是特定的物理位置,而空间描述的是在该位置内发生的相互作用。时间通常被理解为一个固定的时刻或时刻之间的间隔。相比之下,太平洋的观点认为时间、空间和地点彼此之间以及与个人之间都是相互联系的。在这种世界观中,即使一个人离开了一个空间或地方,也会继续产生共鸣,时间被看作是圆形的,而不是线性的,连接着过去、现在和未来。这种相互联系体现在“va”的概念中,它强调了理解参与研究的社区内的关系和责任的重要性(参见Airini et al., 2010)。本文认为认识到土著认识论和本体论本身是有效的重要性,在这种情况下,这意味着认识到va在太平洋研究中的重要性。我们还提出了我们关于参与和流动时间方法论的理论,该方法论通过五项原则概述了太平洋理解如何指导我们与太平洋社区的工作。然后,我们将这五项原则中的每一项作为基于社区的研究的方法论指南,并提供惠灵顿跨语言项目的说明性示例。通过关注太平洋地区对时间、空间和关系(如va)的理解所渗透的研究原则,我们认为这支持了研究留在我们工作的社区中,并为其服务,这是土著研究方法的核心组成部分。