Evaluating the potential of wastewater-based epidemiology to estimate the retail illicit drug market size in Europe: A case study

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Maarten Quireyns , Natan Van Wichelen , Tim Boogaerts , Tim Surmont , Andrew Cunningham , João Matias , Celine Gys , Adrian Covaci , Alexander L.N. van Nuijs
{"title":"Evaluating the potential of wastewater-based epidemiology to estimate the retail illicit drug market size in Europe: A case study","authors":"Maarten Quireyns ,&nbsp;Natan Van Wichelen ,&nbsp;Tim Boogaerts ,&nbsp;Tim Surmont ,&nbsp;Andrew Cunningham ,&nbsp;João Matias ,&nbsp;Celine Gys ,&nbsp;Adrian Covaci ,&nbsp;Alexander L.N. van Nuijs","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Estimating the retail drug market size is complex due to its clandestine nature, yet useful for intervention and policy planning. Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) offers an alternative strategy to estimate population-wide consumption trends by analysing influent wastewater, avoiding self-reporting biases associated with other estimation techniques, e.g., consumption or expenditure-based models. This study evaluates the applicability of WBE for drug market size estimation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using WBE data the drug market situation of amphetamine, cocaine, MDMA, and methamphetamine is estimated in European cities (<em>n</em>=75) through combination with price/purity information (Statistical Bulletin) published by the European Union Drugs Agency. Market sizes were estimated at three levels: (L1) pure drug quantities, (L2) adulterated retail drugs quantities, and (L3) market value. Furthermore, yearly consumption estimates from the commonly applied consecutive seven-day sampling is compared to a randomised stratified sampling approach in Brussels, Belgium.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Challenges include the availability and accuracy of price and purity data, which complicates cross-country comparisons and hinders the higher-levels calculations. Due to missing data, the market value (L3) could only be calculated for a limited number of cities, i.e., 39% (amphetamine), 39% (cocaine), 1% (MDMA), and 23% (methamphetamine). Furthermore, statistically significant differences were shown for amphetamine (up to 139% measurement error) and methamphetamine (up to 58% measurement error) between both sampling approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Particularly at city level, WBE can complement traditional market size estimations, but significant uncertainties remain. Future research should expand one-week consecutive sampling to a randomised stratified sampling approach tailored to drug and location.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 104771"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925000702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Estimating the retail drug market size is complex due to its clandestine nature, yet useful for intervention and policy planning. Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) offers an alternative strategy to estimate population-wide consumption trends by analysing influent wastewater, avoiding self-reporting biases associated with other estimation techniques, e.g., consumption or expenditure-based models. This study evaluates the applicability of WBE for drug market size estimation.

Methods

Using WBE data the drug market situation of amphetamine, cocaine, MDMA, and methamphetamine is estimated in European cities (n=75) through combination with price/purity information (Statistical Bulletin) published by the European Union Drugs Agency. Market sizes were estimated at three levels: (L1) pure drug quantities, (L2) adulterated retail drugs quantities, and (L3) market value. Furthermore, yearly consumption estimates from the commonly applied consecutive seven-day sampling is compared to a randomised stratified sampling approach in Brussels, Belgium.

Results

Challenges include the availability and accuracy of price and purity data, which complicates cross-country comparisons and hinders the higher-levels calculations. Due to missing data, the market value (L3) could only be calculated for a limited number of cities, i.e., 39% (amphetamine), 39% (cocaine), 1% (MDMA), and 23% (methamphetamine). Furthermore, statistically significant differences were shown for amphetamine (up to 139% measurement error) and methamphetamine (up to 58% measurement error) between both sampling approaches.

Conclusions

Particularly at city level, WBE can complement traditional market size estimations, but significant uncertainties remain. Future research should expand one-week consecutive sampling to a randomised stratified sampling approach tailored to drug and location.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信