Assessing cumulative exposure to maintenance immunosuppressive drugs: Metrics, outcomes, and implications for transplant patients

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Cavizshajan Skanthan , Emily Nguyen , Lakindu Somaweera , Madhumitha Rabindranath , Ani Orchanian-Cheff , Alexandra Viau-Trudel , Myriam Khalili , Olusegun Famure , S. Joseph Kim
{"title":"Assessing cumulative exposure to maintenance immunosuppressive drugs: Metrics, outcomes, and implications for transplant patients","authors":"Cavizshajan Skanthan ,&nbsp;Emily Nguyen ,&nbsp;Lakindu Somaweera ,&nbsp;Madhumitha Rabindranath ,&nbsp;Ani Orchanian-Cheff ,&nbsp;Alexandra Viau-Trudel ,&nbsp;Myriam Khalili ,&nbsp;Olusegun Famure ,&nbsp;S. Joseph Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2025.100914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Immunosuppressive drugs are used in the management of transplant patients to prevent organ rejection. However, immunosuppression can be associated with adverse effects such as infections and cancers. This study aimed to characterize the measures of cumulative immunosuppressive drug exposure (CIDE) used in the literature and their associated outcomes in transplant patients. A literature search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews using search terms related to maintenance immunosuppressants and CIDE. Study risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Thirty-one articles were included in this qualitative synthesis. Sixteen articles (52 %) calculated the total dose of immunosuppression over the treatment period, while eight (26 %) used area-under-the-curve of trough level concentrations to quantify CIDE. Five (16 %) articles investigated time-weighted metrics of calcineurin inhibitors and four (13 %) used other metrics that could not be categorized into the previous groups. Most studies investigated CIDE with calcineurin inhibitors and used additive dosing methods. This approach was also popular with corticosteroids and multi-drug exposures. The variety of metrics used in the literature reveals a lack of standardization in the evaluation of CIDE and long-term outcomes. Future studies should validate these metrics for clinical application, especially pertaining to infectious outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"39 2","pages":"Article 100914"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X2500014X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immunosuppressive drugs are used in the management of transplant patients to prevent organ rejection. However, immunosuppression can be associated with adverse effects such as infections and cancers. This study aimed to characterize the measures of cumulative immunosuppressive drug exposure (CIDE) used in the literature and their associated outcomes in transplant patients. A literature search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews using search terms related to maintenance immunosuppressants and CIDE. Study risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Thirty-one articles were included in this qualitative synthesis. Sixteen articles (52 %) calculated the total dose of immunosuppression over the treatment period, while eight (26 %) used area-under-the-curve of trough level concentrations to quantify CIDE. Five (16 %) articles investigated time-weighted metrics of calcineurin inhibitors and four (13 %) used other metrics that could not be categorized into the previous groups. Most studies investigated CIDE with calcineurin inhibitors and used additive dosing methods. This approach was also popular with corticosteroids and multi-drug exposures. The variety of metrics used in the literature reveals a lack of standardization in the evaluation of CIDE and long-term outcomes. Future studies should validate these metrics for clinical application, especially pertaining to infectious outcomes.
评估维持免疫抑制药物的累积暴露:移植患者的指标、结果和影响
免疫抑制药物用于移植患者的管理,以防止器官排斥反应。然而,免疫抑制可能与感染和癌症等不良反应有关。本研究旨在描述文献中使用的累积免疫抑制药物暴露(CIDE)的测量方法及其在移植患者中的相关结果。在Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid EMBASE、Cochrane CENTRAL和Cochrane系统评价数据库中检索与维护性免疫抑制剂和CIDE相关的文献。使用预后研究质量工具评估研究偏倚风险。这一定性综合纳入了31篇文章。16篇文章(52%)计算了整个治疗期间免疫抑制的总剂量,而8篇(26%)使用谷水平浓度曲线下面积来量化CIDE。五篇(16%)研究了钙调磷酸酶抑制剂的时间加权指标,四篇(13%)使用了其他不能归入前一组的指标。大多数研究用钙调磷酸酶抑制剂研究CIDE,并使用添加剂给药方法。这种方法在皮质类固醇和多种药物暴露中也很流行。文献中使用的各种指标表明,在CIDE和长期结果的评估中缺乏标准化。未来的研究应该验证这些指标的临床应用,特别是关于感染结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Reviews
Transplantation Reviews IMMUNOLOGY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
40
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信