Comparative perioperative narcotic use in tlif patients: Spinal versus general anesthesia in a retrospective cohort study of 180 cases in hospital and ambulatory settings

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Colin Gold , Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski , Holley Spears , Ernest E. Braxton
{"title":"Comparative perioperative narcotic use in tlif patients: Spinal versus general anesthesia in a retrospective cohort study of 180 cases in hospital and ambulatory settings","authors":"Colin Gold ,&nbsp;Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski ,&nbsp;Holley Spears ,&nbsp;Ernest E. Braxton","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To implement an integrated anesthesia and surgery protocol of improved postoperative pain control to facilitate transitioning of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) from a hospital to an ambulatory surgery center setting by lowering postoperative (in-facility) narcotic consumption and length of stay (LOS) transitioning from general to awake spinal anesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study of 180 patients who received awake or general anesthesia (GA) MI-TLIF from 2017 to 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 180 MI-TLIF patients, 101 (56 %) received awake protocol and 79 (44 %) received general anesthesia. Baseline characteristics (age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), smoking status) were similar between groups except for body mass index (BMI) and height which was higher in the GA group. ASC patients had a significantly lower CCI (3.25 ± 1.55 vs. 1.33 ± 0.96; p &lt; 0.001). Awake patients had shorter facility LOS and total LOS compared to GA group (Hospital LOS: 25.67 ± 1.77 hours vs 33.91 ± 2.7 hours, p &lt; 0.05; p = 0.009). PACU LOS was shorter in a hospital setting (1.19 ± 0.04 hrs.) than in the ASC (6.68 ± 0.90 hrs.; p &lt; 0.001) since patients could be transferred to a step-down unit after immediate postoperative recovery. The total facility LOS was also significantly extended in inpatients (33.81 ± 1.68 hrs.) versus ASC patients (6.68 ± 0.9045; p &lt; 0.001). Awake patients required less narcotics during their entire post-operative stay compared to GA patients (155.83 ± 15.87 MME vs 258.27 ± 21.18 MME, p &lt; 0.001). Additionally, the awake group had a shorter operative time compared to the GA group (2.43 ± 0.10 hours vs. 2.93 ± 0.05 hours, p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Awake MI-TLIF procedure with spinal anesthesia is associated with shorter post-operative LOS, less post-operative narcotic use, and shorter operative time compared to MI-TLIF under GA. Awake spinal anesthesia facilitates performing MI-TLIF in an ASC due to lower narcotic requirements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 108840"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725001234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To implement an integrated anesthesia and surgery protocol of improved postoperative pain control to facilitate transitioning of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) from a hospital to an ambulatory surgery center setting by lowering postoperative (in-facility) narcotic consumption and length of stay (LOS) transitioning from general to awake spinal anesthesia.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 180 patients who received awake or general anesthesia (GA) MI-TLIF from 2017 to 2023.

Results

Among 180 MI-TLIF patients, 101 (56 %) received awake protocol and 79 (44 %) received general anesthesia. Baseline characteristics (age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), smoking status) were similar between groups except for body mass index (BMI) and height which was higher in the GA group. ASC patients had a significantly lower CCI (3.25 ± 1.55 vs. 1.33 ± 0.96; p < 0.001). Awake patients had shorter facility LOS and total LOS compared to GA group (Hospital LOS: 25.67 ± 1.77 hours vs 33.91 ± 2.7 hours, p < 0.05; p = 0.009). PACU LOS was shorter in a hospital setting (1.19 ± 0.04 hrs.) than in the ASC (6.68 ± 0.90 hrs.; p < 0.001) since patients could be transferred to a step-down unit after immediate postoperative recovery. The total facility LOS was also significantly extended in inpatients (33.81 ± 1.68 hrs.) versus ASC patients (6.68 ± 0.9045; p < 0.001). Awake patients required less narcotics during their entire post-operative stay compared to GA patients (155.83 ± 15.87 MME vs 258.27 ± 21.18 MME, p < 0.001). Additionally, the awake group had a shorter operative time compared to the GA group (2.43 ± 0.10 hours vs. 2.93 ± 0.05 hours, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Awake MI-TLIF procedure with spinal anesthesia is associated with shorter post-operative LOS, less post-operative narcotic use, and shorter operative time compared to MI-TLIF under GA. Awake spinal anesthesia facilitates performing MI-TLIF in an ASC due to lower narcotic requirements.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信