Risk Factor-Based Screening for Early Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ayana Korsa MSc , Wubshet Tesfaye PhD , Kamal Sud MD , Ines Krass PhD , Ronald L. Castelino PhD
{"title":"Risk Factor-Based Screening for Early Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review","authors":"Ayana Korsa MSc ,&nbsp;Wubshet Tesfaye PhD ,&nbsp;Kamal Sud MD ,&nbsp;Ines Krass PhD ,&nbsp;Ronald L. Castelino PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2025.100979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><div>Kidney failure can be prevented or delayed if chronic kidney disease (CKD) is detected and treated early. Targeted screening has been shown effective in detecting CKD worldwide, but a recently updated summary of evidence is lacking. We synthesized up-to-date evidence of the effectiveness of risk factor-based screening for the early detection of CKD among adults in primary care.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>We retrieved articles from Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and Scopus. Relevant gray literature and hand-searching bibliographies of key articles were also performed.</div></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Study Populations</h3><div>Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with at least 1 known CKD risk factor in primary care.</div></div><div><h3>Selection Criteria for Studies</h3><div>Prospective studies applying CKD screening in adults based on at least 1 CKD risk factor.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Data were abstracted from full texts and the risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>No meta-analysis was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 24 studies from 11 countries fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Diverse screening tests, CKD definitions, formulas for estimating kidney function, and positive screening test cutoffs were used. Most studies (n = 22) employed estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) (n = 14), and dipstick urinalysis (n = 9) for screening. The prevalence of reduced kidney function and/or kidney damage was between 2.9% and 56%, and confirmed CKD varied from 4.4% to 17.1%. Increased patient referrals and physician visits, higher patient satisfaction, and some form of patient willingness to pay for the services were reported because of screening.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Meta-analysis was not conducted, and the findings might not be generalized to resource-limited settings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Risk factor-based screening effectively identifies a substantial proportion of people with undiagnosed CKD, but there is still scope for improvement. We recommend future studies have robust designs and multidimensional interventions to establish the effectiveness of targeted CKD screening in primary care.</div></div><div><h3>Plain Language Summary</h3><div>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health issue worldwide. Targeted screening programs for high-risk populations (eg, diabetes) are clinically effective and cost-effective in detecting CKD, according to studies. We conducted a systematic review to summarize up-to-date evidence on risk factor-based screening for early detection of CKD in primary care. From the results, it may be inferred that targeted screening effectively detects a significant proportion of previously unknown CKD in primary care. However, there are inconsistencies in study design, screening tests, and measurement across studies. This study highlights the integral role of CKD screening in primary care settings including community pharmacies and the need for robustly designed studies (eg, cluster randomized controlled trials) to establish the effectiveness of targeted CKD screening in primary care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100979"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059525000159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale & Objective

Kidney failure can be prevented or delayed if chronic kidney disease (CKD) is detected and treated early. Targeted screening has been shown effective in detecting CKD worldwide, but a recently updated summary of evidence is lacking. We synthesized up-to-date evidence of the effectiveness of risk factor-based screening for the early detection of CKD among adults in primary care.

Study Design

We retrieved articles from Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and Scopus. Relevant gray literature and hand-searching bibliographies of key articles were also performed.

Setting & Study Populations

Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with at least 1 known CKD risk factor in primary care.

Selection Criteria for Studies

Prospective studies applying CKD screening in adults based on at least 1 CKD risk factor.

Data Extraction

Data were abstracted from full texts and the risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools.

Analytical Approach

No meta-analysis was conducted.

Results

In total, 24 studies from 11 countries fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Diverse screening tests, CKD definitions, formulas for estimating kidney function, and positive screening test cutoffs were used. Most studies (n = 22) employed estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) (n = 14), and dipstick urinalysis (n = 9) for screening. The prevalence of reduced kidney function and/or kidney damage was between 2.9% and 56%, and confirmed CKD varied from 4.4% to 17.1%. Increased patient referrals and physician visits, higher patient satisfaction, and some form of patient willingness to pay for the services were reported because of screening.

Limitations

Meta-analysis was not conducted, and the findings might not be generalized to resource-limited settings.

Conclusions

Risk factor-based screening effectively identifies a substantial proportion of people with undiagnosed CKD, but there is still scope for improvement. We recommend future studies have robust designs and multidimensional interventions to establish the effectiveness of targeted CKD screening in primary care.

Plain Language Summary

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health issue worldwide. Targeted screening programs for high-risk populations (eg, diabetes) are clinically effective and cost-effective in detecting CKD, according to studies. We conducted a systematic review to summarize up-to-date evidence on risk factor-based screening for early detection of CKD in primary care. From the results, it may be inferred that targeted screening effectively detects a significant proportion of previously unknown CKD in primary care. However, there are inconsistencies in study design, screening tests, and measurement across studies. This study highlights the integral role of CKD screening in primary care settings including community pharmacies and the need for robustly designed studies (eg, cluster randomized controlled trials) to establish the effectiveness of targeted CKD screening in primary care.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney Medicine
Kidney Medicine Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信