Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Improving Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Jiaqi Lou , Xiaoyu Zhu , Ziyi Xiang , Jingyao Song , Neng Huang , Guoying Jin , Shengyong Cui , Youfen Fan , JiLiang Li
{"title":"Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Improving Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Jiaqi Lou ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Zhu ,&nbsp;Ziyi Xiang ,&nbsp;Jingyao Song ,&nbsp;Neng Huang ,&nbsp;Guoying Jin ,&nbsp;Shengyong Cui ,&nbsp;Youfen Fan ,&nbsp;JiLiang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This latest systematic review and meta-analysis aim to examine the efficacy of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in pediatric burns.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Relevant articles were retrieved from Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of science, China National Knowledge Infrastructureris, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals and Wanfang database. The primary outcome was the healing time, and secondary outcomes were the skin graft survival rate, reoperation, complications, numbers of dressing change, incidence of scarring, scar areas and scar scores. Data were pooled and expressed as relative risk (RR), mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>12 studies with 884 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled data from all included studies demonstrated that the patients who have applied ADM treatment had significantly reduced healing time (MD = −3.13; 95 % CI: −4.99 to −1.26; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 94.0 %), complications (RR = 0.40; 95 % CI: 0.20–0.79, <em>p</em> = 0.008, I<sup>2</sup> = 25 %), numbers of dressing change (MD = −4.41; 95 % CI: −7.46 to −1.37, p = 0.005, I<sup>2</sup> = 97 %) and incidence of scarring (RR = 0.38; 95 % CI: 0.18–0.78, p = 0.009, I<sup>2</sup> = 77 %) compared to those who have not applied ADM treatment. There were no significant differences in skin graft survival rate, reoperation, scar areas and scar scores between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ADM may accelerate wound healing, reduce complications and dressing changes, and inhibit scarring in pediatric burns, however, due to the high level of heterogeneity and methodological differences among the included studies, these results should be interpreted with caution. Further research with standardized protocols and larger, more diverse patient populations is needed to confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 5","pages":"Article 162270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346825001150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This latest systematic review and meta-analysis aim to examine the efficacy of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in pediatric burns.

Methods

Relevant articles were retrieved from Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of science, China National Knowledge Infrastructureris, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals and Wanfang database. The primary outcome was the healing time, and secondary outcomes were the skin graft survival rate, reoperation, complications, numbers of dressing change, incidence of scarring, scar areas and scar scores. Data were pooled and expressed as relative risk (RR), mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI).

Results

12 studies with 884 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled data from all included studies demonstrated that the patients who have applied ADM treatment had significantly reduced healing time (MD = −3.13; 95 % CI: −4.99 to −1.26; p < 0.001, I2 = 94.0 %), complications (RR = 0.40; 95 % CI: 0.20–0.79, p = 0.008, I2 = 25 %), numbers of dressing change (MD = −4.41; 95 % CI: −7.46 to −1.37, p = 0.005, I2 = 97 %) and incidence of scarring (RR = 0.38; 95 % CI: 0.18–0.78, p = 0.009, I2 = 77 %) compared to those who have not applied ADM treatment. There were no significant differences in skin graft survival rate, reoperation, scar areas and scar scores between the two groups.

Conclusion

ADM may accelerate wound healing, reduce complications and dressing changes, and inhibit scarring in pediatric burns, however, due to the high level of heterogeneity and methodological differences among the included studies, these results should be interpreted with caution. Further research with standardized protocols and larger, more diverse patient populations is needed to confirm these findings.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信