Disparities in disease presentation among patients with papillary thyroid cancer: A retrospective cohort study

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Nina Rodriguez , Dragan Vujovic , Mathilda Alsen , Eric Genden , Maaike van Gerwen
{"title":"Disparities in disease presentation among patients with papillary thyroid cancer: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Nina Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Dragan Vujovic ,&nbsp;Mathilda Alsen ,&nbsp;Eric Genden ,&nbsp;Maaike van Gerwen","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Prior research suggests that racial and ethnic minorities present with advanced papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), traditionally defined using surgical pathology. However, marginalized populations are more likely to experience delays in surgical treatment, raising concerns that surgical staging may misrepresent the extent of disease at initial presentation. This study investigates disparities in disease presentation using cytology from Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA), which is performed at first evaluation and precedes surgery, in an institutional cohort of PTC patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-site retrospective review of 405 patients with PTC from 2018 to 2019 evaluated the association between sociodemographic variables and the likelihood of presenting with cytologically-confirmed malignancy using FNA. Patients with malignant cytology (Bethesda VI) were compared to those with unconfirmed malignancy (Bethesda III-V). To validate the clinical significance of the Bethesda VI classification, we conducted an additional analysis examining whether these patients presented with more advanced disease.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients classified as Bethesda VI on FNA were younger and more likely to present with advanced disease features, compared to Bethesda III-V patients. On multivariable analysis, patients in the lowest income group were significantly more likely to present with Bethesda VI compared to those in the highest income group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Differences in initial presentation were observed in our institutional cohort of PTC patients. Lower median household income was independently associated with presenting with Bethesda VI, even after adjusting for race/ethnicity. This analysis highlights the clinical relevance of considering factors beyond race and ethnicity alone to better tailor early detection efforts and strategic resource allocation, thereby addressing disparities more effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 102212"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740425000271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Prior research suggests that racial and ethnic minorities present with advanced papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), traditionally defined using surgical pathology. However, marginalized populations are more likely to experience delays in surgical treatment, raising concerns that surgical staging may misrepresent the extent of disease at initial presentation. This study investigates disparities in disease presentation using cytology from Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA), which is performed at first evaluation and precedes surgery, in an institutional cohort of PTC patients.

Methods

A single-site retrospective review of 405 patients with PTC from 2018 to 2019 evaluated the association between sociodemographic variables and the likelihood of presenting with cytologically-confirmed malignancy using FNA. Patients with malignant cytology (Bethesda VI) were compared to those with unconfirmed malignancy (Bethesda III-V). To validate the clinical significance of the Bethesda VI classification, we conducted an additional analysis examining whether these patients presented with more advanced disease.

Results

Patients classified as Bethesda VI on FNA were younger and more likely to present with advanced disease features, compared to Bethesda III-V patients. On multivariable analysis, patients in the lowest income group were significantly more likely to present with Bethesda VI compared to those in the highest income group.

Conclusion

Differences in initial presentation were observed in our institutional cohort of PTC patients. Lower median household income was independently associated with presenting with Bethesda VI, even after adjusting for race/ethnicity. This analysis highlights the clinical relevance of considering factors beyond race and ethnicity alone to better tailor early detection efforts and strategic resource allocation, thereby addressing disparities more effectively.
甲状腺乳头状癌患者疾病表现的差异:一项回顾性队列研究
目的先前的研究表明,少数民族和种族存在晚期甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC),传统上用外科病理学来定义。然而,边缘人群更有可能经历手术治疗的延误,这引起了人们的关注,即手术分期可能错误地反映了最初表现时的疾病程度。本研究在PTC患者的机构队列中,使用细针穿刺(FNA)细胞学调查疾病表现的差异,FNA是在首次评估和手术前进行的。方法对2018年至2019年405例PTC患者进行单点回顾性分析,评估社会人口学变量与FNA显示细胞学证实的恶性肿瘤可能性之间的关系。恶性细胞学(Bethesda VI)患者与未确诊的恶性(Bethesda III-V)患者进行比较。为了验证Bethesda VI分类的临床意义,我们进行了一项额外的分析,检查这些患者是否表现出更晚期的疾病。结果与Bethesda III-V级患者相比,FNA分类为Bethesda VI级的患者更年轻,更有可能出现晚期疾病特征。在多变量分析中,与最高收入组相比,最低收入组的患者更有可能出现Bethesda VI。结论:在我们的机构队列PTC患者中观察到初始表现的差异。即使在调整了种族/民族因素后,较低的家庭收入中位数与出现Bethesda VI独立相关。该分析强调了仅考虑种族和民族以外的因素以更好地定制早期检测工作和战略资源分配的临床相关性,从而更有效地解决差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Oncology-Oxford
Surgical Oncology-Oxford 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信