Improvement and Practice of Evaluation Method of Vegetation Ecological Resilience under Drought Stress

IF 4.8 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Cuimei Lv, Xuefeng Li, Minhua Ling*, Tianye Wang and Zhaoying Niu, 
{"title":"Improvement and Practice of Evaluation Method of Vegetation Ecological Resilience under Drought Stress","authors":"Cuimei Lv,&nbsp;Xuefeng Li,&nbsp;Minhua Ling*,&nbsp;Tianye Wang and Zhaoying Niu,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c0100510.1021/acsestwater.4c01005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In the context of increasing global drought, what are the differences in the response and recovery characteristics of different vegetation to drought? The existing research mainly focuses on one aspect of vegetation resistance or recovery, lacking a comprehensive quantitative evaluation method of vegetation ecological resilience. The quantitative methodology for assessing vegetation resistance and recovery from drought, utilizing gross primary productivity (GPP), is refined in this paper. These two indicators of vegetation resistance and recovery are combined to develop an evaluation strategy for assessing vegetation ecological resilience under drought conditions. Taking the Yellow River Basin as an example, the results showed that the vegetation ecological resilience of the Yellow River Basin under drought stress showed a downward trend from 1982 to 2018. Spatially, the distribution of low resilience in arid and semiarid areas in the north and high resilience in river source and downstream areas is presented. The ecological resilience of woodland is the highest, that of grassland is the lowest. It helps to gain a deeper understanding of the drought adaptation mechanism of vegetation in the Yellow River Basin under the background of climate change, and provides support for the sustainable development of the vegetation ecosystem under environmental change.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 3","pages":"1229–1239 1229–1239"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c01005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of increasing global drought, what are the differences in the response and recovery characteristics of different vegetation to drought? The existing research mainly focuses on one aspect of vegetation resistance or recovery, lacking a comprehensive quantitative evaluation method of vegetation ecological resilience. The quantitative methodology for assessing vegetation resistance and recovery from drought, utilizing gross primary productivity (GPP), is refined in this paper. These two indicators of vegetation resistance and recovery are combined to develop an evaluation strategy for assessing vegetation ecological resilience under drought conditions. Taking the Yellow River Basin as an example, the results showed that the vegetation ecological resilience of the Yellow River Basin under drought stress showed a downward trend from 1982 to 2018. Spatially, the distribution of low resilience in arid and semiarid areas in the north and high resilience in river source and downstream areas is presented. The ecological resilience of woodland is the highest, that of grassland is the lowest. It helps to gain a deeper understanding of the drought adaptation mechanism of vegetation in the Yellow River Basin under the background of climate change, and provides support for the sustainable development of the vegetation ecosystem under environmental change.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信