Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Groups May Have Underused The Emergency Department For Nonavoidable Visits, 2018-22.

Richard K Leuchter, Melody Craff, Sitaram Vangala, Chi-Hong Tseng, Julia Cave Arbanas, Cyrus Tabatabai-Yazdi, Michael Hadfield, Dale Skinner, Cheryl L Damberg, Catherine A Sarkisian, John N Mafi, Katherine L Kahn
{"title":"Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Groups May Have Underused The Emergency Department For Nonavoidable Visits, 2018-22.","authors":"Richard K Leuchter, Melody Craff, Sitaram Vangala, Chi-Hong Tseng, Julia Cave Arbanas, Cyrus Tabatabai-Yazdi, Michael Hadfield, Dale Skinner, Cheryl L Damberg, Catherine A Sarkisian, John N Mafi, Katherine L Kahn","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the decades preceding the COVID-19 pandemic, emergency department (ED) use increased more rapidly for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients than for advantaged patients, often because of barriers to accessing office-based care. However, it remains unknown whether the pandemic has had durable effects on socioeconomic disparities in ED use. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ED visits in the US, using multipayer claims data. We used a difference-in-differences approach to compare ED visit rates between March 2020 and August 2022 with rates from the same months of 2018-19. Among 15.6 million ED visits, potentially avoidable visits persistently declined for all insured populations during the pandemic period. Potentially nonavoidable visits also declined early in the pandemic but rebounded to more than 95 percent of expected rates. However, stratifying by insurance revealed that this rebound occurred among commercially insured and Medicare fee-for-service patients; potentially nonavoidable visits only returned to about 75 percent of expected rates among Medicaid and dual-eligible patients. Although this suggests a beneficial reduction in potentially avoidable ED use, it also indicates the simultaneous emergence of a disparity wherein socioeconomically disadvantaged groups may be underusing the ED for potentially higher-acuity illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":519943,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","volume":"44 3","pages":"322-332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the decades preceding the COVID-19 pandemic, emergency department (ED) use increased more rapidly for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients than for advantaged patients, often because of barriers to accessing office-based care. However, it remains unknown whether the pandemic has had durable effects on socioeconomic disparities in ED use. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ED visits in the US, using multipayer claims data. We used a difference-in-differences approach to compare ED visit rates between March 2020 and August 2022 with rates from the same months of 2018-19. Among 15.6 million ED visits, potentially avoidable visits persistently declined for all insured populations during the pandemic period. Potentially nonavoidable visits also declined early in the pandemic but rebounded to more than 95 percent of expected rates. However, stratifying by insurance revealed that this rebound occurred among commercially insured and Medicare fee-for-service patients; potentially nonavoidable visits only returned to about 75 percent of expected rates among Medicaid and dual-eligible patients. Although this suggests a beneficial reduction in potentially avoidable ED use, it also indicates the simultaneous emergence of a disparity wherein socioeconomically disadvantaged groups may be underusing the ED for potentially higher-acuity illness.

2018-22年,社会经济弱势群体可能没有充分利用急诊室进行不可避免的访问。
在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前的几十年里,社会经济条件较差的患者使用急诊科的人数比条件较好的患者增加得更快,这往往是因为在获得办公室护理方面存在障碍。然而,目前尚不清楚大流行是否对ED使用中的社会经济差异产生了持久影响。我们使用多付款人索赔数据,对美国急诊科就诊进行了回顾性队列研究。我们使用差异中的差异方法比较了2020年3月至2022年8月与2018-19年同期的急诊科就诊率。在1560万急诊科就诊中,在大流行期间,所有参保人群的潜在可避免就诊持续下降。可能不可避免的就诊人数在大流行初期也有所下降,但反弹至预期的95%以上。然而,按保险类别分层显示,这种反弹发生在商业保险和医疗保险收费服务患者中;在医疗补助和双重资格的患者中,潜在的不可避免的就诊率只回到了预期的75%左右。虽然这表明潜在可避免的ED使用有益减少,但它也表明同时出现了一种差异,即社会经济上处于不利地位的群体可能对潜在的高敏度疾病使用ED不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信