Characterisation (and mischaracterisation) of occupational injuries in portuguese jurisprudence. An analysis from 2011 to 2021.

Glória Rebelo, António Almeida
{"title":"Characterisation (and mischaracterisation) of occupational injuries in portuguese jurisprudence. An analysis from 2011 to 2021.","authors":"Glória Rebelo, António Almeida","doi":"10.12961/aprl.2024.27.04.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on Portuguese case law, this study examined the characterisation and mischaracterisation of occupational injuries in the Portuguese court system. A content analysis was carried out, namely on how the Portuguese courts understand the characterisation and mischaracterisation (requirements) of occupational injury sentences. Case law was collected and analysed from listed decisions by the higher courts (Supreme Court of Justice and the Portuguese Courts of Appeal), between 2011 and 2021. A total of 330 judicial decisions were identified and analysed; groups of descriptors were categorised and sub-themes were identified. The sub-theme 'concept and scope of the injury' was identified in 80 decisions and 'mischaracterisation of injuries' in 46 decisions. This analysis reflects the Portuguese courts' understanding of the extent to which occupational injuries are characterised, which will be important to safeguard the system of compensation for occupational injuries in Portugal.</p>","PeriodicalId":101300,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales","volume":"27 4","pages":"395-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2024.27.04.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on Portuguese case law, this study examined the characterisation and mischaracterisation of occupational injuries in the Portuguese court system. A content analysis was carried out, namely on how the Portuguese courts understand the characterisation and mischaracterisation (requirements) of occupational injury sentences. Case law was collected and analysed from listed decisions by the higher courts (Supreme Court of Justice and the Portuguese Courts of Appeal), between 2011 and 2021. A total of 330 judicial decisions were identified and analysed; groups of descriptors were categorised and sub-themes were identified. The sub-theme 'concept and scope of the injury' was identified in 80 decisions and 'mischaracterisation of injuries' in 46 decisions. This analysis reflects the Portuguese courts' understanding of the extent to which occupational injuries are characterised, which will be important to safeguard the system of compensation for occupational injuries in Portugal.

葡萄牙法学中职业伤害的特征(和错误特征)。2011年至2021年的分析。
基于葡萄牙判例法,本研究考察了葡萄牙法院系统中职业伤害的特征和错误特征。进行了内容分析,即葡萄牙法院如何理解职业伤害判决的特征和错误特征(要求)。2011年至2021年间,从高等法院(最高法院和葡萄牙上诉法院)列出的判决中收集和分析了判例法。共查明和分析了330项司法判决;对描述符组进行了分类,并确定了子主题。80项判决确定了“伤害的概念和范围”,46项判决确定了“伤害的错误特征”。这一分析反映了葡萄牙法院对职业伤害特征的程度的理解,这对于维护葡萄牙职业伤害赔偿制度非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信