Association Between Telehealth Initiation Of Stimulant Therapy And New Substance Use Disorder Diagnoses.

Joanne Constantin, Sean Esteban McCabe, Emily Pasman, Timothy Wilens, Kao-Ping Chua
{"title":"Association Between Telehealth Initiation Of Stimulant Therapy And New Substance Use Disorder Diagnoses.","authors":"Joanne Constantin, Sean Esteban McCabe, Emily Pasman, Timothy Wilens, Kao-Ping Chua","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policy makers have temporarily extended COVID-19 pandemic-related flexibilities allowing controlled substance prescribing via telehealth without in-person visits. To inform debates regarding whether these flexibilities should be permanent, we used commercial and Medicaid claims to evaluate the risk for newly diagnosed substance use disorders (SUDs) associated with telehealth versus in-person initiation of stimulant therapy. Analyses included 77,153 patients ages 12-64 without prior SUD diagnoses who initiated stimulant therapy during 2021. The outcome was a new diagnosis for SUD within 365 days of initiation. The prevalence of new SUDs was higher in the telehealth versus in-person group (3.7 percent versus 3.2 percent), as was the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities, which are known SUD risk factors. In adjusted analyses, telehealth initiation was not an independent risk factor for new SUDs, as the higher risk for this diagnosis disappeared when we controlled for psychiatric comorbidities. The same was true when we stratified the analyses by age, except among people ages 26-34. These findings suggest that extending telehealth flexibilities for stimulant prescribing might not increase the risk for newly diagnosed SUDs in most patients. When stimulants are being prescribed via telehealth, measures to prevent misuse may be particularly important among people ages 26-34.</p>","PeriodicalId":519943,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","volume":"44 3","pages":"361-369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy makers have temporarily extended COVID-19 pandemic-related flexibilities allowing controlled substance prescribing via telehealth without in-person visits. To inform debates regarding whether these flexibilities should be permanent, we used commercial and Medicaid claims to evaluate the risk for newly diagnosed substance use disorders (SUDs) associated with telehealth versus in-person initiation of stimulant therapy. Analyses included 77,153 patients ages 12-64 without prior SUD diagnoses who initiated stimulant therapy during 2021. The outcome was a new diagnosis for SUD within 365 days of initiation. The prevalence of new SUDs was higher in the telehealth versus in-person group (3.7 percent versus 3.2 percent), as was the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities, which are known SUD risk factors. In adjusted analyses, telehealth initiation was not an independent risk factor for new SUDs, as the higher risk for this diagnosis disappeared when we controlled for psychiatric comorbidities. The same was true when we stratified the analyses by age, except among people ages 26-34. These findings suggest that extending telehealth flexibilities for stimulant prescribing might not increase the risk for newly diagnosed SUDs in most patients. When stimulants are being prescribed via telehealth, measures to prevent misuse may be particularly important among people ages 26-34.

远程医疗启动兴奋剂治疗与新物质使用障碍诊断的关系。
政策制定者暂时延长了与COVID-19大流行相关的灵活性,允许通过远程医疗开具受控药物处方,而无需亲自就诊。为了讨论这些灵活性是否应该是永久性的,我们使用商业和医疗补助索赔来评估新诊断的物质使用障碍(sud)与远程医疗相关的风险,而不是亲自开始兴奋剂治疗。分析包括77153名年龄在12-64岁之间、之前没有SUD诊断、在2021年开始兴奋剂治疗的患者。结果是在开始治疗的365天内诊断出新的SUD。远程医疗组的新发SUD患病率高于现场医疗组(3.7%对3.2%),精神合并症的患病率也较高,这是已知的SUD风险因素。在调整分析中,远程医疗开始并不是新发sud的独立危险因素,因为当我们控制精神合并症时,这种诊断的高风险消失了。当我们按年龄进行分层分析时,除了26-34岁的人群外,结果也是如此。这些发现表明,扩大远程医疗灵活性兴奋剂处方可能不会增加大多数患者新诊断的sud的风险。当通过远程保健开具兴奋剂处方时,防止滥用的措施在26-34岁人群中可能特别重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信