Does early surfactant improve outcome in late preterm newborn? Retrospective study in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Jorge Bartual Bardisa, Carolina Vizcaíno Díaz, María Jesús Ferrández Berenguer
{"title":"Does early surfactant improve outcome in late preterm newborn? Retrospective study in a neonatal intensive care unit.","authors":"Jorge Bartual Bardisa, Carolina Vizcaíno Díaz, María Jesús Ferrández Berenguer","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the early administration of surfactant, before 12 h of life, versus late, in late preterm neonates (born between 34<sup>+0</sup> and 36<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation), with moderate-severe respiratory distress.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, observational, analytical, case-control study, with late preterm infants admitted between 2012-2021. It is divided into 2 groups: surfactant administered ≤ 12 h of life and >12 h and evolution is compared using univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) level III of a Universitary Hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients or participants: </strong>57 patients, 30 in the early group and 27 in the late group.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>neonates from 34<sup>+0</sup> to 36<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation, with respiratory distress syndrome, in need of non-invasive ventilation and surfactant.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>Sociodemographic, clinical and evolutionary: redosing, duration of respiratory support, oxygen and time to stop requiring it after surfactant. Also, complications and length of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the early group there was less need for redosing (3.3% vs 48.1%, P < .001) and a decrease in duration, in days, of stay in the NICU (7 vs 10.5, P .002), invasive mechanical ventilation (2.4 vs 3.9, P .034), total respiratory support (4.6 vs 6.6, P .005) and oxygen therapy (0.4 vs 2.8, P < .001). Also, lower incidence of pneumothorax (0% vs 33.3%, P .001). Furthermore, 12 h after administration, 83.4% maintained FiO2 0.21, compared to 44.4% in the late administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, early administration in late preterm infants provides benefits in terms of respiratory assistance and complications. We suggest expanding studies to establish recommendations in this group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":" ","pages":"502161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2025.502161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the early administration of surfactant, before 12 h of life, versus late, in late preterm neonates (born between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks of gestation), with moderate-severe respiratory distress.

Design: Retrospective, observational, analytical, case-control study, with late preterm infants admitted between 2012-2021. It is divided into 2 groups: surfactant administered ≤ 12 h of life and >12 h and evolution is compared using univariate analysis.

Setting: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) level III of a Universitary Hospital.

Patients or participants: 57 patients, 30 in the early group and 27 in the late group.

Inclusion criteria: neonates from 34+0 to 36+6 weeks of gestation, with respiratory distress syndrome, in need of non-invasive ventilation and surfactant.

Interventions: None.

Main variables of interest: Sociodemographic, clinical and evolutionary: redosing, duration of respiratory support, oxygen and time to stop requiring it after surfactant. Also, complications and length of hospitalization.

Results: In the early group there was less need for redosing (3.3% vs 48.1%, P < .001) and a decrease in duration, in days, of stay in the NICU (7 vs 10.5, P .002), invasive mechanical ventilation (2.4 vs 3.9, P .034), total respiratory support (4.6 vs 6.6, P .005) and oxygen therapy (0.4 vs 2.8, P < .001). Also, lower incidence of pneumothorax (0% vs 33.3%, P .001). Furthermore, 12 h after administration, 83.4% maintained FiO2 0.21, compared to 44.4% in the late administration.

Conclusions: In our study, early administration in late preterm infants provides benefits in terms of respiratory assistance and complications. We suggest expanding studies to establish recommendations in this group of patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信