Nilakshi Gunatillaka, Jenny Advocat, Lauren Ball, Terry Haines, Cylie Williams, Tze Lin Chai, Mitchell Bowden, Melissa Savaglio, Kate Gudorf, Elizabeth Sturgiss
{"title":"Maximising the potential of type 2 diabetes remission: scale up and sustainability considerations from the DiRECT-Aus implementation trial.","authors":"Nilakshi Gunatillaka, Jenny Advocat, Lauren Ball, Terry Haines, Cylie Williams, Tze Lin Chai, Mitchell Bowden, Melissa Savaglio, Kate Gudorf, Elizabeth Sturgiss","doi":"10.1071/PY24116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Approximately 500 million people worldwide live with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The UK's 'Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial' (DiRECT) is a potential novel method for care. An Australian trial of DiRECT (DiRECT-Aus) showed that 56% of participants achieved diabetes remission at 12months. We explored the experiences of patients, clinicians and trial partners involved in DiRECT-Aus to ascertain the acceptability and feasibility of DiRECT-Aus, as well as factors influencing implementation, to inform recommendations for sustainable scale up into mainstream primary care. Methods This qualitative implementation research conducted within a constructivist paradigm involved semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Data analysis followed an inductive thematic approach, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results Patients (n =14), general practitioners (n =3), practice nurses (n =6), dietitians (n =7) and DiRECT-Aus trial partners (n =5) were interviewed. We identified four core components of DiRECT-Aus that are essential for implementation and scale up. They were: (1) access to very low-energy diet products; (2) high frequency of contact with the dietitian; (3) dietitian's clinical knowledge and patient-centred practice; and (4) absence of financial costs to patients. Several additional factors that could support implementation and suggested funding models are described. Conclusions This study concludes that DiRECT-Aus was acceptable and feasible to patients and clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"31 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Approximately 500 million people worldwide live with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The UK's 'Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial' (DiRECT) is a potential novel method for care. An Australian trial of DiRECT (DiRECT-Aus) showed that 56% of participants achieved diabetes remission at 12months. We explored the experiences of patients, clinicians and trial partners involved in DiRECT-Aus to ascertain the acceptability and feasibility of DiRECT-Aus, as well as factors influencing implementation, to inform recommendations for sustainable scale up into mainstream primary care. Methods This qualitative implementation research conducted within a constructivist paradigm involved semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Data analysis followed an inductive thematic approach, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results Patients (n =14), general practitioners (n =3), practice nurses (n =6), dietitians (n =7) and DiRECT-Aus trial partners (n =5) were interviewed. We identified four core components of DiRECT-Aus that are essential for implementation and scale up. They were: (1) access to very low-energy diet products; (2) high frequency of contact with the dietitian; (3) dietitian's clinical knowledge and patient-centred practice; and (4) absence of financial costs to patients. Several additional factors that could support implementation and suggested funding models are described. Conclusions This study concludes that DiRECT-Aus was acceptable and feasible to patients and clinicians.