Estimated Savings From Extending Prescription Drug Inflationary Rebates To All Commercial Plans.

Marissa B Reitsma, Stacie B Dusetzina, Jeromie M Ballreich, Antonio J Trujillo, Michelle M Mello
{"title":"Estimated Savings From Extending Prescription Drug Inflationary Rebates To All Commercial Plans.","authors":"Marissa B Reitsma, Stacie B Dusetzina, Jeromie M Ballreich, Antonio J Trujillo, Michelle M Mello","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The inflationary rebate provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 require pharmaceutical manufacturers to pay money back to Medicare if they raise prices faster than the rate of inflation. Opportunities now exist for Congress and the states to extend inflationary rebates to commercial plans. We demonstrate the potential savings from applying inflationary rebates to prescriptions filled in commercial plans by simulating savings under several policy design options. We estimate that a policy mimicking the IRA's design could have saved as much as $8.1 billion in 2021 by imposing rebates on 1,100 drugs. To minimize the administrative burden of assessing inflationary rebates, Congress or states could restrict rebates to certain high-cost drugs and still garner substantial savings. For example, including only drugs costing more than $830 per month or ranked in the top 300 drugs by total spending could halve the number of rebate-eligible drugs yet capture 96 percent of estimated savings that could be available under a policy that mimics the IRA design ($7.7 billion). Restricting eligibility to the top 300 drugs by total spending could capture 85 percent of those potential savings ($6.9 billion), imposing rebates on just 194 drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":519943,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","volume":"44 3","pages":"256-264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The inflationary rebate provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 require pharmaceutical manufacturers to pay money back to Medicare if they raise prices faster than the rate of inflation. Opportunities now exist for Congress and the states to extend inflationary rebates to commercial plans. We demonstrate the potential savings from applying inflationary rebates to prescriptions filled in commercial plans by simulating savings under several policy design options. We estimate that a policy mimicking the IRA's design could have saved as much as $8.1 billion in 2021 by imposing rebates on 1,100 drugs. To minimize the administrative burden of assessing inflationary rebates, Congress or states could restrict rebates to certain high-cost drugs and still garner substantial savings. For example, including only drugs costing more than $830 per month or ranked in the top 300 drugs by total spending could halve the number of rebate-eligible drugs yet capture 96 percent of estimated savings that could be available under a policy that mimics the IRA design ($7.7 billion). Restricting eligibility to the top 300 drugs by total spending could capture 85 percent of those potential savings ($6.9 billion), imposing rebates on just 194 drugs.

将处方药通货膨胀回扣扩展到所有商业计划的估计节省。
《2022年通货膨胀削减法案》(IRA)的通货膨胀回扣条款要求,如果制药商提高价格的速度快于通货膨胀率,就必须向医疗保险支付资金。国会和各州现在有机会将通货膨胀补贴扩大到商业计划中。我们通过模拟几种政策设计选项下的节约,证明了将通货膨胀回扣应用于商业计划中填写的处方的潜在节约。我们估计,模仿爱尔兰共和军设计的政策可以通过对1100种药物征收回扣,在2021年节省多达81亿美元。为了尽量减少评估通货膨胀退税的行政负担,国会或各州可以将退税限制在某些高成本药品上,这样仍然可以节省大量资金。例如,只包括每月花费超过830美元或按总支出排在前300位的药物,可能会使符合退税条件的药物数量减半,但在模仿IRA设计的政策下(77亿美元),可获得估计节省的96%。根据总支出限制前300种药物的资格可以获得85%的潜在节省(69亿美元),仅对194种药物实施回扣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信