Moral comfort and its influencing factors from intensive care unit nurses' perspective.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Nessa Abbasivand-Jeyranha, Maasoumeh Barkhordari-Sharifabad
{"title":"Moral comfort and its influencing factors from intensive care unit nurses' perspective.","authors":"Nessa Abbasivand-Jeyranha, Maasoumeh Barkhordari-Sharifabad","doi":"10.1177/09697330251324312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIntensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses face ethical challenges during decision-making in terms of the sophisticated nature of in-patients. Moral comfort is known as a phenomenon with a positive effect on moral decision-making and moral actions of nurses.AimThis study investigated ICU nurses' level of moral comfort and factors affecting it.Research DesignThis study used a cross-sectional descriptive design.Participants and research contextA total of 350 ICU nurses were selected with the convenience sampling method. The data collection tool included the Demographic Characteristics Questionnaire and the Moral Comfort Questionnaire. The data were analyzed with SPSS19 using descriptive and inferential statistics.Ethical ConsiderationsUpon the Committee of Ethics in Human Research's acceptance of the research concept, approvals were secured, and informed written consent was acquired from all participants. They were assured of the information confidentiality of participation.FindingsThe mean moral comfort score was 112.75 ± 13.18. The mean score of personal factors related to ethics was higher than the external factors pertaining to the environment/organization. The mean scores of \"moral comfort in a specific situation\" and \"moral comfort in general\" were 50.52 ± 5.08 and 62.32 ± 9.31, respectively. The mean moral comfort score of nurses was significantly correlated with age, clinical work experience, ICU work experience, marital status, education, and employment status (<i>p</i> < .05). Regression analysis revealed that ICU work experience as the strongest predictor variable predicted 17.7% of moral comfort variance.ConclusionAlthough moral comfort score was at a favorable level, ICU nurses did not feel comfortable when making decisions in moral situations, and nursing managers did not support the decisions of nursing staff. Consequently, this issue warrants the attention of nursing managers and policy-makers. They need to enhance the quality of healthcare by offering more support and addressing the variables influencing the moral comfort of nurses.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251324312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251324312","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIntensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses face ethical challenges during decision-making in terms of the sophisticated nature of in-patients. Moral comfort is known as a phenomenon with a positive effect on moral decision-making and moral actions of nurses.AimThis study investigated ICU nurses' level of moral comfort and factors affecting it.Research DesignThis study used a cross-sectional descriptive design.Participants and research contextA total of 350 ICU nurses were selected with the convenience sampling method. The data collection tool included the Demographic Characteristics Questionnaire and the Moral Comfort Questionnaire. The data were analyzed with SPSS19 using descriptive and inferential statistics.Ethical ConsiderationsUpon the Committee of Ethics in Human Research's acceptance of the research concept, approvals were secured, and informed written consent was acquired from all participants. They were assured of the information confidentiality of participation.FindingsThe mean moral comfort score was 112.75 ± 13.18. The mean score of personal factors related to ethics was higher than the external factors pertaining to the environment/organization. The mean scores of "moral comfort in a specific situation" and "moral comfort in general" were 50.52 ± 5.08 and 62.32 ± 9.31, respectively. The mean moral comfort score of nurses was significantly correlated with age, clinical work experience, ICU work experience, marital status, education, and employment status (p < .05). Regression analysis revealed that ICU work experience as the strongest predictor variable predicted 17.7% of moral comfort variance.ConclusionAlthough moral comfort score was at a favorable level, ICU nurses did not feel comfortable when making decisions in moral situations, and nursing managers did not support the decisions of nursing staff. Consequently, this issue warrants the attention of nursing managers and policy-makers. They need to enhance the quality of healthcare by offering more support and addressing the variables influencing the moral comfort of nurses.

重症监护室护士的道德安慰及其影响因素
背景重症监护室(ICU)护士在决策过程中面临着复杂的住院病人的道德挑战。道德安慰是一种对护士的道德决策和道德行为有积极影响的现象。目的调查ICU护士道德舒适水平及其影响因素。研究设计本研究采用横断面描述性设计。研究对象及研究背景采用方便抽样法选取350名ICU护士。数据收集工具包括人口统计学特征问卷和道德安慰问卷。采用SPSS19进行描述性统计和推理统计分析。伦理考虑在人类研究伦理委员会接受研究概念后,获得了批准,并获得了所有参与者的知情书面同意。他们被保证参与的信息是保密的。结果:平均道德安慰评分为112.75±13.18分。与道德有关的个人因素的平均得分高于与环境/组织有关的外部因素。“特定情况下的道德舒适”和“一般道德舒适”的平均得分分别为50.52±5.08分和62.32±9.31分。护士道德安慰平均得分与年龄、临床工作经验、ICU工作经验、婚姻状况、文化程度、就业状况显著相关(p < 0.05)。回归分析显示,ICU工作经验作为最强的预测变量,预测了17.7%的道德舒适方差。结论ICU护士在道德情境下的决策感觉不舒服,护理管理者不支持护理人员的决策。因此,这个问题值得护理管理者和政策制定者的注意。他们需要通过提供更多的支持和解决影响护士道德安慰的变量来提高医疗质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信