Development of a Drawing Application to Evaluate Hand and Wrist Function: A Pilot Study.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jay Chandra, Charlotte L E Laane, Oscar Shen, Mark Stam, Jason Z Shang, Nicole F Yu, Neal C Chen, Abhiram R Bhashyam
{"title":"Development of a Drawing Application to Evaluate Hand and Wrist Function: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Jay Chandra, Charlotte L E Laane, Oscar Shen, Mark Stam, Jason Z Shang, Nicole F Yu, Neal C Chen, Abhiram R Bhashyam","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We developed a custom digital drawing application to assess hand function. We conducted an initial validation study of this technique to (1) assess which drawing features are associated with hand function, (2) differentiate patients from control subjects for both dominant and nondominant hands, and (3) assess the correlation of drawing features with previously validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, participants were asked to draw shapes on an Apple iPad with a digital pen using a custom app. Drawings from 142 hands in 73 participants were categorized based on hand dominance and patient/control subject. We calculated kinematic/geometric and pressure-based features from raw drawing data. Random forest models were used to classify patients and control subjects and to identify correlation with validated PROMs. Model performance for classification was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients and control subjects could not be differentiated by visual inspection; however, many drawing features were different (P < 0.05) between patients and control subjects for both dominant (78 features) and nondominant (27 features) hand drawings. Circle drawings were most informative, and pressure features were most important. The classification metrics including area under the curve (0.82 to 0.84), accuracy (0.75 to 77), and F1 score (0.78 to 0.81) suggest that hand function is reasonably assessed through drawing. Drawing features were correlated with patient-rated wrist evaluation, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We developed a new technique to objectively measure hand function using drawing. Drawing features were correlated with validated PROMs and could differentiate patients from control subjects, regardless of hand dominance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00817","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We developed a custom digital drawing application to assess hand function. We conducted an initial validation study of this technique to (1) assess which drawing features are associated with hand function, (2) differentiate patients from control subjects for both dominant and nondominant hands, and (3) assess the correlation of drawing features with previously validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods: In this prospective study, participants were asked to draw shapes on an Apple iPad with a digital pen using a custom app. Drawings from 142 hands in 73 participants were categorized based on hand dominance and patient/control subject. We calculated kinematic/geometric and pressure-based features from raw drawing data. Random forest models were used to classify patients and control subjects and to identify correlation with validated PROMs. Model performance for classification was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve.

Results: Patients and control subjects could not be differentiated by visual inspection; however, many drawing features were different (P < 0.05) between patients and control subjects for both dominant (78 features) and nondominant (27 features) hand drawings. Circle drawings were most informative, and pressure features were most important. The classification metrics including area under the curve (0.82 to 0.84), accuracy (0.75 to 77), and F1 score (0.78 to 0.81) suggest that hand function is reasonably assessed through drawing. Drawing features were correlated with patient-rated wrist evaluation, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores (P < 0.001).

Discussion: We developed a new technique to objectively measure hand function using drawing. Drawing features were correlated with validated PROMs and could differentiate patients from control subjects, regardless of hand dominance.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信