Health Professionals' perspectives on Human Rights and Mental Health Recovery.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Igor de Oliveira Reis, Emanuele Seicenti de Brito, Maria Luiza Dos Santos Barbosa, Maria Geraldo Dói, Ana Beatriz Zanardo Mion, Carla Aparecida Arena Ventura
{"title":"Health Professionals' perspectives on Human Rights and Mental Health Recovery.","authors":"Igor de Oliveira Reis, Emanuele Seicenti de Brito, Maria Luiza Dos Santos Barbosa, Maria Geraldo Dói, Ana Beatriz Zanardo Mion, Carla Aparecida Arena Ventura","doi":"10.1177/09697330251324323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The guarantee of human rights in the healthcare of individuals with mental disorders is a global challenge. Health practices frequently fail to integrate relational ethical principles in the promotion of holistic and inclusive care. It is therefore crucial to investigate how healthcare professionals perceive and conduct their practices in this context. <b>Objective:</b> To understand, in the light of Relational Ethics, the perceptions and conduct of healthcare professionals regarding the guarantee of human rights and the recovery process of individuals with mental disorders. <b>Research Design:</b> An exploratory study was conducted using ideas storming techniques and field notes for data recording, which were analyzed through Thematic Analysis and discussed in the light of the core elements of Relational Ethics. <b>Participants and Research Context:</b> The study involved 26 healthcare professionals (15 community health workers, 5 nurses, 3 nursing assistants, 2 doctors, and 1 pharmacy assistant) from a primary healthcare unit in a municipality in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, during the application of the module \"Recovery and Right to Health\" of the WHO QualityRights training. <b>Ethical Considerations:</b> The research project to which this study belongs was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Nursing at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (report number 6.257.303). <b>Findings:</b> Three themes were identified: (1) Feeling worthless when facing the lack of structure of mental health services: appearance, accessibility, and privacy; (2) dealing with barriers to the recovery of individuals with psychosocial, intellectual, or cognitive disabilities; and (3) an ethical duty: to understand the roles of families and other supporters in promoting recovery. These themes primarily explored resource scarcity, social stigma, and emotional support. <b>Conclusions:</b> The study reinforces the need for practices that integrate ethical care, respect for autonomy, and dialogue, which are fundamental to ensuring human rights and facilitating the recovery process.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251324323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251324323","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The guarantee of human rights in the healthcare of individuals with mental disorders is a global challenge. Health practices frequently fail to integrate relational ethical principles in the promotion of holistic and inclusive care. It is therefore crucial to investigate how healthcare professionals perceive and conduct their practices in this context. Objective: To understand, in the light of Relational Ethics, the perceptions and conduct of healthcare professionals regarding the guarantee of human rights and the recovery process of individuals with mental disorders. Research Design: An exploratory study was conducted using ideas storming techniques and field notes for data recording, which were analyzed through Thematic Analysis and discussed in the light of the core elements of Relational Ethics. Participants and Research Context: The study involved 26 healthcare professionals (15 community health workers, 5 nurses, 3 nursing assistants, 2 doctors, and 1 pharmacy assistant) from a primary healthcare unit in a municipality in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, during the application of the module "Recovery and Right to Health" of the WHO QualityRights training. Ethical Considerations: The research project to which this study belongs was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Nursing at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (report number 6.257.303). Findings: Three themes were identified: (1) Feeling worthless when facing the lack of structure of mental health services: appearance, accessibility, and privacy; (2) dealing with barriers to the recovery of individuals with psychosocial, intellectual, or cognitive disabilities; and (3) an ethical duty: to understand the roles of families and other supporters in promoting recovery. These themes primarily explored resource scarcity, social stigma, and emotional support. Conclusions: The study reinforces the need for practices that integrate ethical care, respect for autonomy, and dialogue, which are fundamental to ensuring human rights and facilitating the recovery process.

卫生专业人员对人权和精神健康康复的看法。
背景:在精神障碍患者的医疗保健中保障人权是一项全球性挑战。保健做法往往不能将有关的道德原则纳入促进全面和包容性护理的工作中。因此,调查医疗保健专业人员如何在这种情况下感知和开展他们的实践是至关重要的。目的:根据关系伦理学,了解卫生保健专业人员对人权保障和精神障碍患者康复过程的看法和行为。研究设计:探索性研究采用思想风暴技术和现场记录数据笔记,通过专题分析对数据进行分析,并结合关系伦理学的核心要素进行讨论。参与者和研究背景:在应用世卫组织质量权利培训的“康复和健康权”模块期间,研究涉及巴西圣保罗州一个城市初级保健单位的26名卫生保健专业人员(15名社区卫生工作者、5名护士、3名护理助理、2名医生和1名药房助理)。伦理考虑:本研究所属的研究项目已获得巴西圣保罗大学 ribebe o Preto护理学院研究伦理委员会批准(报告号6.257.303)。结果发现:(1)面对缺乏结构的心理健康服务时,感觉毫无价值:外观、可及性和隐私;(2)处理社会心理、智力或认知障碍患者康复的障碍;(3)道德责任:了解家庭和其他支持者在促进康复中的作用。这些主题主要探讨资源稀缺、社会耻辱和情感支持。结论:该研究强调了将伦理关怀、尊重自主权和对话结合起来的实践的必要性,这些对于确保人权和促进康复进程至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信