Older Adults' Experiences and Perceived Barriers to Access and Adoption of the Technology-Based Physio-Feedback Exercise Program.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Research in Gerontological Nursing Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.3928/19404921-20250304-01
Eunice Oladepe Ojo, Victoria Loerzel, Ladda Thiamwong
{"title":"Older Adults' Experiences and Perceived Barriers to Access and Adoption of the Technology-Based Physio-Feedback Exercise Program.","authors":"Eunice Oladepe Ojo, Victoria Loerzel, Ladda Thiamwong","doi":"10.3928/19404921-20250304-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore participants' experiences with the Physio-Feedback Exercise Program (PEER) and potential barriers to access and adoption of the program.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The current qualitative descriptive study was conducted among 32 older adults aged ≥60 years in Central Florida who participated in the PEER. A semi-structured interview guide was used to obtain participants' experiences with the program. They were individually interviewed and audio recorded. Responses were transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major themes emerged: <i>Positive Aspects of Using Technology</i>, <i>Sociocultural Influence on Participation</i>, <i>Impact of the PEER</i>, and <i>Barriers and Challenges to the PEER</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants were satisfied with the intervention and made healthier lifestyle changes to improve their health. They adopted the program and intended to continue practicing what they learned beyond the program. Future studies should address barriers to adopting and sustaining the PEER. [<i>Research in Gerontological Nursing, 18</i>(3), 137-145.].</p>","PeriodicalId":51272,"journal":{"name":"Research in Gerontological Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"137-145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Gerontological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20250304-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore participants' experiences with the Physio-Feedback Exercise Program (PEER) and potential barriers to access and adoption of the program.

Method: The current qualitative descriptive study was conducted among 32 older adults aged ≥60 years in Central Florida who participated in the PEER. A semi-structured interview guide was used to obtain participants' experiences with the program. They were individually interviewed and audio recorded. Responses were transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Four major themes emerged: Positive Aspects of Using Technology, Sociocultural Influence on Participation, Impact of the PEER, and Barriers and Challenges to the PEER.

Conclusion: Participants were satisfied with the intervention and made healthier lifestyle changes to improve their health. They adopted the program and intended to continue practicing what they learned beyond the program. Future studies should address barriers to adopting and sustaining the PEER. [Research in Gerontological Nursing, 18(3), 137-145.].

老年人的经验和感知障碍获取和采用基于技术的身体反馈锻炼计划。
目的:探讨参与者对物理反馈运动计划(PEER)的体验以及进入和采用该计划的潜在障碍。方法:目前的定性描述性研究在佛罗里达州中部32名年龄≥60岁的老年人中进行,他们参加了PEER。采用半结构化访谈指南来获取参与者对该计划的体验。他们被单独采访并录音。回答被逐字抄录、编码,并使用主题分析进行分析。结果:出现了四个主要主题:使用技术的积极方面,社会文化对参与的影响,同伴的影响,以及对同伴的障碍和挑战。结论:参与者对干预感到满意,并改变了更健康的生活方式以改善他们的健康状况。他们接受了这个项目,并打算在项目之外继续实践他们所学到的东西。今后的研究应解决采用和维持PEER的障碍。[老年护理研究,xx(x), xx-xx.]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Gerontological Nursing is a forum for disseminating peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, cutting-edge gerontological nursing research and theory to investigators, educators, academicians, clinicians, and policymakers involved with older adults in all health care settings. The Journal accepts manuscripts reporting research, theory, integrative and systematic reviews, instrument development, and research methods with the aims of improving the wellness and quality of care of the older adult population. Theory papers should advance gerontological knowledge, and integrative reviews should provide an analysis of the state of the science and provide direction for future research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信