Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Diagnosed With Sacral Chordoma in a Retrospective Multicenter Study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Control Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1177/10732748251323730
Aneta Maria Borkowska, Andrzej Pieńkowski, Paulina Chmiel, Tomasz Skóra, Radosław Michalik, Piotr Rutkowski, Mateusz Jacek Spałek
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Diagnosed With Sacral Chordoma in a Retrospective Multicenter Study.","authors":"Aneta Maria Borkowska, Andrzej Pieńkowski, Paulina Chmiel, Tomasz Skóra, Radosław Michalik, Piotr Rutkowski, Mateusz Jacek Spałek","doi":"10.1177/10732748251323730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundChordoma is a rare and aggressive primary bone sarcoma. En-block resection remains the primary treatment, but some patients are unable to undergo it due to the location and potential complications. Currently, there is no direct comparison of the effects of radiotherapy (RTH) and surgical treatment. However, retrospective analyses indicate the potential benefits of using RTH.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 48 patients with sacral chordoma who were treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy between 2001-2020. Among those, 22 were initially treated with surgery, 19 with definitive radiotherapy, and 7 received combined treatment. The outcomes of the treatment of recurrence in 16 patients were considered. The resection margins were defined according to R classification, and the Kaplan-Meier method was employed to calculate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsThe median (mOS) for the entire cohort was 80.6 months (95% CI: 62.3-NA), and the median (mDFS) was 40.4 months (95% CI: 35-69.5). Patients who underwent radical surgery of the primary tumor did not achieve the mOS (mean 68), while patients treated only with RTH for the primary tumor achieved an mOS of 62.3 months (95% CI: 52.1-NA). This resulted in a significant advantage of surgery over RTH in terms of OS (<i>P</i> = 0.01). This was not observed for DFS. The 3-year DFS rates were 65% in the surgical treatment group and 53.3% in the RTH group. The 3-year OS rates were 96% in the surgery group and 88.9% in the RTH group. In the treatment of recurrence, there were no statistically significant differences between RTH and surgery, for OS (<i>P</i> = 0.76).ConclusionsRadical surgery remains the optimal treatment for sacral chordoma. For patients who are not candidates for surgical intervention, RTH offers excellent long-term outcomes. The treatment of recurrence remains a significant challenge. Comparing modern RTH techniques and surgical procedures could provide further insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251323730"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251323730","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundChordoma is a rare and aggressive primary bone sarcoma. En-block resection remains the primary treatment, but some patients are unable to undergo it due to the location and potential complications. Currently, there is no direct comparison of the effects of radiotherapy (RTH) and surgical treatment. However, retrospective analyses indicate the potential benefits of using RTH.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 48 patients with sacral chordoma who were treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy between 2001-2020. Among those, 22 were initially treated with surgery, 19 with definitive radiotherapy, and 7 received combined treatment. The outcomes of the treatment of recurrence in 16 patients were considered. The resection margins were defined according to R classification, and the Kaplan-Meier method was employed to calculate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsThe median (mOS) for the entire cohort was 80.6 months (95% CI: 62.3-NA), and the median (mDFS) was 40.4 months (95% CI: 35-69.5). Patients who underwent radical surgery of the primary tumor did not achieve the mOS (mean 68), while patients treated only with RTH for the primary tumor achieved an mOS of 62.3 months (95% CI: 52.1-NA). This resulted in a significant advantage of surgery over RTH in terms of OS (P = 0.01). This was not observed for DFS. The 3-year DFS rates were 65% in the surgical treatment group and 53.3% in the RTH group. The 3-year OS rates were 96% in the surgery group and 88.9% in the RTH group. In the treatment of recurrence, there were no statistically significant differences between RTH and surgery, for OS (P = 0.76).ConclusionsRadical surgery remains the optimal treatment for sacral chordoma. For patients who are not candidates for surgical intervention, RTH offers excellent long-term outcomes. The treatment of recurrence remains a significant challenge. Comparing modern RTH techniques and surgical procedures could provide further insights.

一项回顾性多中心研究中诊断为骶脊索瘤患者的长期预后
脊索瘤是一种罕见的侵袭性原发性骨肉瘤。整块切除仍然是主要的治疗方法,但由于位置和潜在的并发症,一些患者无法接受手术。目前,没有直接比较放疗(RTH)和手术治疗的效果。然而,回顾性分析表明使用RTH的潜在益处。方法回顾性分析2001 ~ 2020年收治的48例骶骨脊索瘤手术和/或放疗患者的资料。其中,22例最初接受手术治疗,19例接受最终放疗,7例接受联合治疗。对16例复发患者的治疗结果进行分析。根据R分类确定切除边缘,采用Kaplan-Meier法计算无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果整个队列的中位(mOS)为80.6个月(95% CI: 62.3-NA),中位(mDFS)为40.4个月(95% CI: 35-69.5)。接受原发肿瘤根治性手术的患者未达到生存期(平均68个月),而仅接受RTH治疗的原发肿瘤患者的生存期为62.3个月(95% CI: 52.1 na)。这导致手术在OS方面明显优于RTH (P = 0.01)。这在DFS中没有观察到。手术治疗组3年DFS为65%,RTH组为53.3%。手术组3年OS为96%,RTH组3年OS为88.9%。在治疗复发方面,RTH与手术的OS差异无统计学意义(P = 0.76)。结论根治性手术仍是治疗骶脊索瘤的最佳方法。对于不适合手术的患者,RTH提供了良好的长期预后。治疗复发仍然是一个重大挑战。比较现代RTH技术和外科手术可以提供进一步的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Control
Cancer Control ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信