Screening and patient selection for bone-anchored limb implantation and rehabilitation: what makes a good candidate?

Jason W Stoneback, Meghan K Wally, Angela Abernethy, Dan Milius, Mohamad E Awad
{"title":"Screening and patient selection for bone-anchored limb implantation and rehabilitation: what makes a good candidate?","authors":"Jason W Stoneback, Meghan K Wally, Angela Abernethy, Dan Milius, Mohamad E Awad","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Osseointegration of a bone-anchored limb (BAL) is an emerging rehabilitation technique that offers significant advantages over traditional socket prostheses. By addressing functional limitations and recurrent cutaneous complications, BAL systems have shown an 82%-90% increase in daily prosthesis use among patients, who also report improvements in functional ability, balance, comfort, and overall quality of life. Despite these benefits, the process of patient selection for BAL remains underdeveloped, with evidence-based guidelines still in their infancy. This article aims to propose a workflow for patient selection and screening in BAL osseointegration, leveraging the current literature, interdisciplinary clinical experience, and established models. A comprehensive evaluation process is suggested that incorporates anatomical, physiological, psychological, and lifestyle factors. These include radiological evaluation, amputation history, prosthetic component assessment, laboratory tests, psychiatric history, cognitive assessments, and considerations of home safety and postoperative care. The evaluation should ideally be conducted by an interdisciplinary team to ensure a balanced consideration of risks and benefits for each candidate. As the understanding of BAL osseointegration advances, it is expected that patient indications will expand and contraindications will be more clearly defined. The proposed workflow aims to standardize patient selection, thereby optimizing surgical outcomes and rehabilitation processes. This approach is essential for maximizing the benefits of BAL systems while ensuring patient safety and improving long-term rehabilitation outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"8 1 Suppl","pages":"e368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Osseointegration of a bone-anchored limb (BAL) is an emerging rehabilitation technique that offers significant advantages over traditional socket prostheses. By addressing functional limitations and recurrent cutaneous complications, BAL systems have shown an 82%-90% increase in daily prosthesis use among patients, who also report improvements in functional ability, balance, comfort, and overall quality of life. Despite these benefits, the process of patient selection for BAL remains underdeveloped, with evidence-based guidelines still in their infancy. This article aims to propose a workflow for patient selection and screening in BAL osseointegration, leveraging the current literature, interdisciplinary clinical experience, and established models. A comprehensive evaluation process is suggested that incorporates anatomical, physiological, psychological, and lifestyle factors. These include radiological evaluation, amputation history, prosthetic component assessment, laboratory tests, psychiatric history, cognitive assessments, and considerations of home safety and postoperative care. The evaluation should ideally be conducted by an interdisciplinary team to ensure a balanced consideration of risks and benefits for each candidate. As the understanding of BAL osseointegration advances, it is expected that patient indications will expand and contraindications will be more clearly defined. The proposed workflow aims to standardize patient selection, thereby optimizing surgical outcomes and rehabilitation processes. This approach is essential for maximizing the benefits of BAL systems while ensuring patient safety and improving long-term rehabilitation outcomes.

骨锚定肢体植入和康复的筛选和患者选择:什么是好的候选人?
骨锚定肢体骨整合(BAL)是一种新兴的康复技术,与传统的骨臼假体相比具有显著的优势。通过解决功能限制和复发性皮肤并发症,BAL系统在患者中显示出82%-90%的日常假体使用增加,这些患者还报告了功能能力、平衡、舒适度和整体生活质量的改善。尽管有这些好处,患者选择BAL的过程仍然不发达,循证指南仍处于起步阶段。本文旨在利用现有文献、跨学科临床经验和已建立的模型,提出BAL骨整合患者选择和筛选的工作流程。建议综合解剖、生理、心理和生活方式等因素进行评估。这些评估包括放射学评估、截肢史、假肢部件评估、实验室检查、精神病史、认知评估以及家庭安全和术后护理的考虑。理想情况下,评估应由一个跨学科的团队进行,以确保对每个候选人的风险和利益进行平衡的考虑。随着对BAL骨融合的了解的进展,预计患者的适应症将会扩大,禁忌症将会更加明确。提出的工作流程旨在规范患者选择,从而优化手术结果和康复过程。这种方法对于最大化BAL系统的益处,同时确保患者安全和改善长期康复结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信