Construction and Application Research of a Perioperative Inspection Checklist for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Lina Chen, Qing Shao, Liangyu Fang, Wei Wei, Jingfen Jin
{"title":"Construction and Application Research of a Perioperative Inspection Checklist for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.","authors":"Lina Chen, Qing Shao, Liangyu Fang, Wei Wei, Jingfen Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To enhance patient safety and improve communication and response times during the perioperative management of patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, a checklist was developed, tested for psychometric properties, and implemented in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a methodological study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A perioperative checklist for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding was developed using a literature review and the Delphi method. The psychometric properties of the checklist were assessed through reliability and validity testing, including Cronbach's α coefficient, split-half reliability, content validity, and construct validity. A pre-and-post intervention study was conducted to evaluate the checklist's practical impact on clinical outcomes. Data were collected on safety indicators, efficiency metrics (including response times), and satisfaction levels.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The final checklist comprises 19 items across 3 domains: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative management. The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.775, indicating good internal consistency. Split-half reliability was 0.701. The scale-content validity index/average for the 3 domains was 0.987, 0.971, and 0.904, respectively, while the item-content validity index ranged from 0.857 to 1.000, demonstrating excellent content validity. Factor loadings for each item exceeded 0.5, and 6 latent factors explained 83.874% of the total variance, confirming the checklist's strong factor structure. In the clinical application, 210 cases were analyzed-101 before and 105 after checklist implementation. The response time for emergency endoscopy improved significantly (t = -2.556, P < 0.05). Additionally, satisfaction with team collaboration showed significant improvement (χ<sup>2</sup> = 8.56, P < 0.05), highlighting the checklist's effectiveness in enhancing clinical outcomes and coordination among the health care team.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The perioperative checklist for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding demonstrates strong reliability, validity, and practical utility. Its application improves response times, patient safety, and teamwork, making it an effective tool for perioperative management in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.11.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To enhance patient safety and improve communication and response times during the perioperative management of patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, a checklist was developed, tested for psychometric properties, and implemented in clinical practice.

Design: This is a methodological study.

Methods: A perioperative checklist for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding was developed using a literature review and the Delphi method. The psychometric properties of the checklist were assessed through reliability and validity testing, including Cronbach's α coefficient, split-half reliability, content validity, and construct validity. A pre-and-post intervention study was conducted to evaluate the checklist's practical impact on clinical outcomes. Data were collected on safety indicators, efficiency metrics (including response times), and satisfaction levels.

Findings: The final checklist comprises 19 items across 3 domains: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative management. The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.775, indicating good internal consistency. Split-half reliability was 0.701. The scale-content validity index/average for the 3 domains was 0.987, 0.971, and 0.904, respectively, while the item-content validity index ranged from 0.857 to 1.000, demonstrating excellent content validity. Factor loadings for each item exceeded 0.5, and 6 latent factors explained 83.874% of the total variance, confirming the checklist's strong factor structure. In the clinical application, 210 cases were analyzed-101 before and 105 after checklist implementation. The response time for emergency endoscopy improved significantly (t = -2.556, P < 0.05). Additionally, satisfaction with team collaboration showed significant improvement (χ2 = 8.56, P < 0.05), highlighting the checklist's effectiveness in enhancing clinical outcomes and coordination among the health care team.

Conclusions: The perioperative checklist for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding demonstrates strong reliability, validity, and practical utility. Its application improves response times, patient safety, and teamwork, making it an effective tool for perioperative management in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信