Exploring Religion and Spirituality in Social Work Practice: A Wisconsin Case Study.

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
David Barry, Jess Bowers
{"title":"Exploring Religion and Spirituality in Social Work Practice: A Wisconsin Case Study.","authors":"David Barry, Jess Bowers","doi":"10.1093/hsw/hlaf005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research suggests spirituality is linked to positive health outcomes, but social workers report barriers to incorporating it into care planning. The literature suggests general interest in learning and executing social work practice involving religion/spirituality (R/S) intentionally. While some empirical study has been conducted, this work is largely superficial and undeveloped. Finally, a changing R/S landscape in the United States further establishes the need for deeper, more nuanced examination. This article explores the actual role that R/S have in social practice and who supports these practices. Wisconsin social workers were surveyed (n = 578) using the Religious/Spiritual Integrated Practice Assessment Scale and other items of original design. Results confirm interest among social workers to include R/S in practice, but formal training is lacking. The data reveal a profile of practitioners who incorporate R/S, correlated with religiosity, religious conservativism, age, and race. Implications include enhancing mentorship, internships, and education to increase efficacy in utilizing R/S in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":47424,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Work","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlaf005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research suggests spirituality is linked to positive health outcomes, but social workers report barriers to incorporating it into care planning. The literature suggests general interest in learning and executing social work practice involving religion/spirituality (R/S) intentionally. While some empirical study has been conducted, this work is largely superficial and undeveloped. Finally, a changing R/S landscape in the United States further establishes the need for deeper, more nuanced examination. This article explores the actual role that R/S have in social practice and who supports these practices. Wisconsin social workers were surveyed (n = 578) using the Religious/Spiritual Integrated Practice Assessment Scale and other items of original design. Results confirm interest among social workers to include R/S in practice, but formal training is lacking. The data reveal a profile of practitioners who incorporate R/S, correlated with religiosity, religious conservativism, age, and race. Implications include enhancing mentorship, internships, and education to increase efficacy in utilizing R/S in the field.

探索社会工作实践中的宗教和灵性:一个威斯康星州的案例研究。
研究表明,灵性与积极的健康结果有关,但社会工作者报告说,将其纳入护理计划存在障碍。文献表明,人们对有意学习和执行涉及宗教/灵性(R/S)的社会工作实践有普遍的兴趣。虽然已经进行了一些实证研究,但这项工作在很大程度上是肤浅和不发达的。最后,美国不断变化的R/S格局进一步表明,需要进行更深入、更细致的研究。本文探讨了R/S在社会实践中的实际作用以及谁支持这些实践。使用宗教/精神综合实践评估量表和其他原始设计的项目对威斯康星州的社会工作者进行了调查(n = 578)。结果证实社会工作者有兴趣将R/S纳入实践,但缺乏正规培训。数据揭示了融入R/S的从业者的概况,与宗教信仰、宗教保守主义、年龄和种族相关。建议包括加强指导,实习和教育,以提高在该领域利用R/S的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health & Social Work
Health & Social Work SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信