{"title":"Treatment of femoropopliteal arterial lesions with excimer laser atherectomy and drug-coated balloon.","authors":"Zhijie Liao, Jinbao Qin, Linbo Liu, Heng Zhang, Qi Tang, Wentao Liu, Minyi Yin, Xinwu Lu, Yi Zhang","doi":"10.1177/17085381251326331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesProximal to mid-term effects of contrast excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) + drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus PTA + drug-coated balloon (DCB) in the treatment of new lesions in the femoral popliteal segment of patients with lower extremity arteriosclerosis and occlusion.MethodsThe clinical data of 105 patients with CT-confirmed femoropopliteal segment lesions (Rutherford grades 3-6) were retrospectively analyzed. According to the computerized randomization method, 58 patients (44 males, mean 72.41 ± 10.58 years) were divided into group A ELA + DCB dilation and 47 patients (35 males, mean 73.83 ± 11.56 years) in group B PTA + DCB dilation. The clinical indexes mainly included the occurrence of Rutherford grade, freedom from target lesion revascularization rate (FTLR), ankle-brachial index (ABI), stage I survival rate, and postoperative complications before, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery and were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe treatment success rate was 100% in all patients. The Rutherford grading at 12 months after operation was significantly improved in both groups, but statistical analysis showed that the improvement was more significant in group A (87.93% vs 72.34%, <i>p</i> = 0.043); ABI (0.77 ± 0.22<sup>abc</sup> vs 0.65 ± 0.10<sup>abc</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.001); FTLR (93.10% vs 78.72%, <i>p</i> = 0.031), respectively. First-stage patency rate (91.38% vs 74.47%, <i>p</i> < 0.001),; complications, and adverse events were not statistically significant between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05).ConclusionsELA + DCB significantly improved the 1-year freedom from target lesion revascularization rate and stage 1 patency rate with no significant increase in complications or adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"214-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381251326331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectivesProximal to mid-term effects of contrast excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) + drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus PTA + drug-coated balloon (DCB) in the treatment of new lesions in the femoral popliteal segment of patients with lower extremity arteriosclerosis and occlusion.MethodsThe clinical data of 105 patients with CT-confirmed femoropopliteal segment lesions (Rutherford grades 3-6) were retrospectively analyzed. According to the computerized randomization method, 58 patients (44 males, mean 72.41 ± 10.58 years) were divided into group A ELA + DCB dilation and 47 patients (35 males, mean 73.83 ± 11.56 years) in group B PTA + DCB dilation. The clinical indexes mainly included the occurrence of Rutherford grade, freedom from target lesion revascularization rate (FTLR), ankle-brachial index (ABI), stage I survival rate, and postoperative complications before, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery and were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe treatment success rate was 100% in all patients. The Rutherford grading at 12 months after operation was significantly improved in both groups, but statistical analysis showed that the improvement was more significant in group A (87.93% vs 72.34%, p = 0.043); ABI (0.77 ± 0.22abc vs 0.65 ± 0.10abc, p = 0.001); FTLR (93.10% vs 78.72%, p = 0.031), respectively. First-stage patency rate (91.38% vs 74.47%, p < 0.001),; complications, and adverse events were not statistically significant between the two groups (p > 0.05).ConclusionsELA + DCB significantly improved the 1-year freedom from target lesion revascularization rate and stage 1 patency rate with no significant increase in complications or adverse events.
目的比较对比准分子激光动脉粥样硬化切除术(ELA) +药物包被球囊(DCB)与PTA +药物包被球囊(DCB)治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞患者股腘段新病变的近中期疗效。方法回顾性分析105例经ct证实的股腘段病变(Rutherford分级3-6级)的临床资料。将58例患者(男性44例,平均72.41±10.58岁)分为A组ELA + DCB扩张术,B组PTA + DCB扩张术47例(男性35例,平均73.83±11.56岁)。比较两组患者术前、术后6个月、12个月的临床指标,主要包括Rutherford分级发生率、靶区无血管重建率(FTLR)、踝肱指数(ABI)、I期生存率及术后并发症。结果所有患者的治疗成功率均为100%。两组术后12个月卢瑟福评分均有显著改善,但统计学分析显示A组改善更为显著(87.93% vs 72.34%, p = 0.043);ABI(0.77±0.22abc vs 0.65±0.10abc, p = 0.001);FTLR (93.10% vs 78.72%, p = 0.031)。一期通畅率(91.38% vs 74.47%, p < 0.001);两组患者并发症、不良事件发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论sela + DCB可显著提高1年无靶病变血运重建率和1期通畅率,并发症和不良事件无明显增加。
期刊介绍:
Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.