Cohort multiple randomized controlled trial in pediatric asthma to assess the long- and short-term effects of eHealth interventions: protocol of the CIRCUS study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Tamara Ruuls, Romi Sprengers, Vera Hengeveld, Boony Thio, Monique Tabak, Deborah Zagers, Job van der Palen, Mattiènne van der Kamp
{"title":"Cohort multiple randomized controlled trial in pediatric asthma to assess the long- and short-term effects of eHealth interventions: protocol of the CIRCUS study.","authors":"Tamara Ruuls, Romi Sprengers, Vera Hengeveld, Boony Thio, Monique Tabak, Deborah Zagers, Job van der Palen, Mattiènne van der Kamp","doi":"10.1177/17534666251323192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma is one of childhood's most prevalent chronic conditions significantly impacting the quality of life. Current asthma management lacks real-time, objective, and longitudinal monitoring reflected by a high prevalence of uncontrolled asthma. Long-term home monitoring promises to establish new clinical endpoints for timely anticipation. In addition, integrating eHealth interventions holds promise for timely and appropriate medical anticipation for controlling symptoms and preventing asthma exacerbations.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to provide a pragmatic study design for gaining insight into longitudinal monitoring, assessing, and comparing eHealth interventions' short- and long-term effects on improving pediatric asthma care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The CIRCUS study design is a cohort multiple randomized controlled trial (cmRCT) with a dynamic cohort of 300 pediatric asthma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study gathers observational and patient-reported measurements at set moments including patient characteristics, healthcare utilization, and asthma, clinical, and environmental outcomes. Participants are randomly appointed to the intervention or control group. The effects of the eHealth interventions are assessed and compared to the control group, deploying the CIRCUS outcomes. The participants continue in the CIRCUS cohort after completing the intervention and its follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study was ethically approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee (NL85668.100.23) on February 15th, 2024.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The CIRCUS study can provide a rich and unique dataset that can improve insight into risk factors of asthma exacerbations and yield new clinical endpoints. Furthermore, the effects of eHealth interventions can be assessed and compared with each other both short- and long-term. In addition, patient groups within the patient population can be discerned to tailor eHealth interventions to personalized needs on improving asthma management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, CIRCUS can provide valuable clinical data to discern risk factors for asthma exacerbations, identify and compare effective scalable eHealth solutions, and improve pediatric asthma care.<b><i>Trial registration</i>:</b> The protocol is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06278662).</p>","PeriodicalId":22884,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease","volume":"19 ","pages":"17534666251323192"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666251323192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asthma is one of childhood's most prevalent chronic conditions significantly impacting the quality of life. Current asthma management lacks real-time, objective, and longitudinal monitoring reflected by a high prevalence of uncontrolled asthma. Long-term home monitoring promises to establish new clinical endpoints for timely anticipation. In addition, integrating eHealth interventions holds promise for timely and appropriate medical anticipation for controlling symptoms and preventing asthma exacerbations.

Objectives: This study aims to provide a pragmatic study design for gaining insight into longitudinal monitoring, assessing, and comparing eHealth interventions' short- and long-term effects on improving pediatric asthma care.

Design: The CIRCUS study design is a cohort multiple randomized controlled trial (cmRCT) with a dynamic cohort of 300 pediatric asthma patients.

Methods: The study gathers observational and patient-reported measurements at set moments including patient characteristics, healthcare utilization, and asthma, clinical, and environmental outcomes. Participants are randomly appointed to the intervention or control group. The effects of the eHealth interventions are assessed and compared to the control group, deploying the CIRCUS outcomes. The participants continue in the CIRCUS cohort after completing the intervention and its follow-up.

Results: This study was ethically approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee (NL85668.100.23) on February 15th, 2024.

Discussion: The CIRCUS study can provide a rich and unique dataset that can improve insight into risk factors of asthma exacerbations and yield new clinical endpoints. Furthermore, the effects of eHealth interventions can be assessed and compared with each other both short- and long-term. In addition, patient groups within the patient population can be discerned to tailor eHealth interventions to personalized needs on improving asthma management.

Conclusion: In conclusion, CIRCUS can provide valuable clinical data to discern risk factors for asthma exacerbations, identify and compare effective scalable eHealth solutions, and improve pediatric asthma care.Trial registration: The protocol is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06278662).

儿童哮喘队列多随机对照试验评估电子健康干预的长期和短期效果:CIRCUS研究方案
背景:哮喘是儿童最常见的慢性疾病之一,严重影响生活质量。目前的哮喘管理缺乏实时、客观和纵向监测,这反映在不受控制的哮喘的高患病率上。长期家庭监测有望为及时预测建立新的临床终点。此外,整合电子卫生干预措施有望为控制症状和预防哮喘恶化提供及时和适当的医疗预测。目的:本研究旨在提供一种实用的研究设计,以深入了解纵向监测、评估和比较电子健康干预措施对改善儿童哮喘护理的短期和长期影响。设计:CIRCUS研究设计是一项包含300名儿童哮喘患者的动态队列的队列多随机对照试验(cmRCT)。方法:该研究收集观察和患者报告的测量数据,包括患者特征、医疗保健利用、哮喘、临床和环境结果。参与者被随机分配到干预组或对照组。评估了电子卫生干预措施的效果,并与对照组进行了比较,部署了CIRCUS结果。参与者在完成干预和随访后继续在CIRCUS队列中。结果:本研究于2024年2月15日获得医学研究伦理委员会(NL85668.100.23)的伦理批准。讨论:CIRCUS研究可以提供丰富而独特的数据集,可以提高对哮喘恶化危险因素的认识,并产生新的临床终点。此外,可以评估和比较电子保健干预措施的短期和长期影响。此外,可以识别患者群体中的患者群体,以定制电子卫生干预措施,以满足改善哮喘管理的个性化需求。结论:总之,CIRCUS可以提供有价值的临床数据,以识别哮喘恶化的危险因素,识别和比较有效的可扩展的eHealth解决方案,并改善儿童哮喘护理。试验注册:该方案在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06278662)上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of respiratory disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信