Causes and impacts of interrupted enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: A secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Hengyu Zheng, Lina Cai, Pingrong Wang, Lijiang Zheng, Jiajia Lin, Ting Sun, Jiaqi Li, Juntao Zuo, Yuxiu Liu, Xianghong Ye
{"title":"Causes and impacts of interrupted enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: A secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Hengyu Zheng, Lina Cai, Pingrong Wang, Lijiang Zheng, Jiajia Lin, Ting Sun, Jiaqi Li, Juntao Zuo, Yuxiu Liu, Xianghong Ye","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malnutrition due to interruption of enteral nutrition remains a prevalent issue in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to determine the frequency and causes of enteral nutrition interruption (ENI)and its impact on implementing enteral nutrition.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre, cluster-randomized controlled trial (N = 2772). This secondary analysis included patients in the ICU for at least 72 h and receiving total enteral nutrition. The causes of ENI were defined as (1) feeding intolerance, (2) diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and (3) others. Multiple linear regression analyses investigated the association between ENI and nutrition intake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1331 patients were included for analysis. Approximately 18.63% of the patients experienced at least one episode of ENI. The main cause of ENI was diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Energy intake was 17.54 ± 6.85 versus 16.64 ± 7.06 (p = .065) among patients with and without ENI, and the protein intake was 0.69 ± 0.27 versus 0.64 ± 0.27 (p = .016). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that ENI was significantly associated with diminishing energy and protein intake (B = -1.012, 95% CI -1.857 to -0.167, p = .019; B = -0.050, 95% CI -0.083 to -0.017, p = .003, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on this multicentre study about ENI, the incidence of interruptions in enteral nutrition was 18.6%, with diagnostic and therapeutic procedures being the leading causes. The occurrence of interruptions in the delivery of enteral nutrition leads to a reduction in the nutritional intake of critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Critical care nurses should establish comprehensive nutrition support protocols and strengthen the training of department nurses, equipping them with the skills to effectively prevent and manage ENI. This is essential for actively achieving feeding goals and improving the outcomes of ICU patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 2","pages":"e70006"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition due to interruption of enteral nutrition remains a prevalent issue in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Aim: This study aimed to determine the frequency and causes of enteral nutrition interruption (ENI)and its impact on implementing enteral nutrition.

Study design: This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre, cluster-randomized controlled trial (N = 2772). This secondary analysis included patients in the ICU for at least 72 h and receiving total enteral nutrition. The causes of ENI were defined as (1) feeding intolerance, (2) diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and (3) others. Multiple linear regression analyses investigated the association between ENI and nutrition intake.

Results: A total of 1331 patients were included for analysis. Approximately 18.63% of the patients experienced at least one episode of ENI. The main cause of ENI was diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Energy intake was 17.54 ± 6.85 versus 16.64 ± 7.06 (p = .065) among patients with and without ENI, and the protein intake was 0.69 ± 0.27 versus 0.64 ± 0.27 (p = .016). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that ENI was significantly associated with diminishing energy and protein intake (B = -1.012, 95% CI -1.857 to -0.167, p = .019; B = -0.050, 95% CI -0.083 to -0.017, p = .003, respectively).

Conclusions: Based on this multicentre study about ENI, the incidence of interruptions in enteral nutrition was 18.6%, with diagnostic and therapeutic procedures being the leading causes. The occurrence of interruptions in the delivery of enteral nutrition leads to a reduction in the nutritional intake of critically ill patients.

Relevance to clinical practice: Critical care nurses should establish comprehensive nutrition support protocols and strengthen the training of department nurses, equipping them with the skills to effectively prevent and manage ENI. This is essential for actively achieving feeding goals and improving the outcomes of ICU patients.

危重病人肠内营养中断的原因和影响:一项集群随机对照试验的二次分析。
背景:肠内营养中断引起的营养不良仍然是重症监护病房(ICU)的一个普遍问题。目的:本研究旨在确定肠内营养中断(ENI)的频率和原因及其对实施肠内营养的影响。研究设计:这是一项多中心、集群随机对照试验(N = 2772)的二次分析。这一次要分析包括在ICU住院至少72小时并接受全肠内营养的患者。ENI的原因被定义为(1)喂养不耐受,(2)诊断和治疗程序,(3)其他。多元线性回归分析调查了ENI与营养摄入之间的关系。结果:共纳入1331例患者进行分析。大约18.63%的患者至少经历过一次ENI发作。ENI的主要原因是诊断和治疗程序。ENI患者和非ENI患者的能量摄入量分别为17.54±6.85和16.64±7.06 (p = 0.065),蛋白质摄入量分别为0.69±0.27和0.64±0.27 (p = 0.016)。多元线性回归分析显示,ENI与能量和蛋白质摄入减少显著相关(B = -1.012, 95% CI -1.857 ~ -0.167, p = 0.019;B = -0.050, 95% CI = -0.083 ~ -0.017, p =。003年,分别)。结论:基于这项关于ENI的多中心研究,肠内营养中断的发生率为18.6%,诊断和治疗程序是主要原因。肠内营养中断的发生导致重症患者营养摄入量的减少。与临床实践的相关性:重症护理护士应建立全面的营养支持方案,加强对科室护士的培训,使其具备有效预防和管理ENI的技能。这对于积极实现喂养目标和改善ICU患者的预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信