{"title":"Causes and impacts of interrupted enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: A secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Hengyu Zheng, Lina Cai, Pingrong Wang, Lijiang Zheng, Jiajia Lin, Ting Sun, Jiaqi Li, Juntao Zuo, Yuxiu Liu, Xianghong Ye","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malnutrition due to interruption of enteral nutrition remains a prevalent issue in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to determine the frequency and causes of enteral nutrition interruption (ENI)and its impact on implementing enteral nutrition.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre, cluster-randomized controlled trial (N = 2772). This secondary analysis included patients in the ICU for at least 72 h and receiving total enteral nutrition. The causes of ENI were defined as (1) feeding intolerance, (2) diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and (3) others. Multiple linear regression analyses investigated the association between ENI and nutrition intake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1331 patients were included for analysis. Approximately 18.63% of the patients experienced at least one episode of ENI. The main cause of ENI was diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Energy intake was 17.54 ± 6.85 versus 16.64 ± 7.06 (p = .065) among patients with and without ENI, and the protein intake was 0.69 ± 0.27 versus 0.64 ± 0.27 (p = .016). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that ENI was significantly associated with diminishing energy and protein intake (B = -1.012, 95% CI -1.857 to -0.167, p = .019; B = -0.050, 95% CI -0.083 to -0.017, p = .003, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on this multicentre study about ENI, the incidence of interruptions in enteral nutrition was 18.6%, with diagnostic and therapeutic procedures being the leading causes. The occurrence of interruptions in the delivery of enteral nutrition leads to a reduction in the nutritional intake of critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Critical care nurses should establish comprehensive nutrition support protocols and strengthen the training of department nurses, equipping them with the skills to effectively prevent and manage ENI. This is essential for actively achieving feeding goals and improving the outcomes of ICU patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 2","pages":"e70006"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Malnutrition due to interruption of enteral nutrition remains a prevalent issue in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Aim: This study aimed to determine the frequency and causes of enteral nutrition interruption (ENI)and its impact on implementing enteral nutrition.
Study design: This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre, cluster-randomized controlled trial (N = 2772). This secondary analysis included patients in the ICU for at least 72 h and receiving total enteral nutrition. The causes of ENI were defined as (1) feeding intolerance, (2) diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and (3) others. Multiple linear regression analyses investigated the association between ENI and nutrition intake.
Results: A total of 1331 patients were included for analysis. Approximately 18.63% of the patients experienced at least one episode of ENI. The main cause of ENI was diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Energy intake was 17.54 ± 6.85 versus 16.64 ± 7.06 (p = .065) among patients with and without ENI, and the protein intake was 0.69 ± 0.27 versus 0.64 ± 0.27 (p = .016). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that ENI was significantly associated with diminishing energy and protein intake (B = -1.012, 95% CI -1.857 to -0.167, p = .019; B = -0.050, 95% CI -0.083 to -0.017, p = .003, respectively).
Conclusions: Based on this multicentre study about ENI, the incidence of interruptions in enteral nutrition was 18.6%, with diagnostic and therapeutic procedures being the leading causes. The occurrence of interruptions in the delivery of enteral nutrition leads to a reduction in the nutritional intake of critically ill patients.
Relevance to clinical practice: Critical care nurses should establish comprehensive nutrition support protocols and strengthen the training of department nurses, equipping them with the skills to effectively prevent and manage ENI. This is essential for actively achieving feeding goals and improving the outcomes of ICU patients.
期刊介绍:
Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics.
Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories:
-research reports
-literature reviews
-developments in practice, education or management
-reflections on practice