Developing the Standardized Workload Assessment Metric for Pediatric Emergency Departments: Initial Steps Using a Modified Delphi Method.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Jake Rose, Alyssa Chong, Kenneth McKinley, Garth Meckler, Tibor Van Rooij, Matthias Görges, Tania Principi, Jocelyn Gravel, Devin Singh, Katrina Hurley, Bruce Wright, Troy Turner, Ahmed Mater, Brett Burstein, Quynh Doan
{"title":"Developing the Standardized Workload Assessment Metric for Pediatric Emergency Departments: Initial Steps Using a Modified Delphi Method.","authors":"Jake Rose, Alyssa Chong, Kenneth McKinley, Garth Meckler, Tibor Van Rooij, Matthias Görges, Tania Principi, Jocelyn Gravel, Devin Singh, Katrina Hurley, Bruce Wright, Troy Turner, Ahmed Mater, Brett Burstein, Quynh Doan","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop a comprehensive list of patient care components performed by pediatric emergency department (PED) physicians that could be individually scored on their subjective workload using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). These \"care components,\" alongside patient and environmental factors that influence workload (\"modifiers\"), will form the basis of the Standardized Workload Assessment Metric for Pediatric Emergency Departments (SWAMPED). We sought to obtain preliminary workload scores for each care component and assess the face validity of the NASA-TLX-derived workload tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After establishing a working list of \"care elements\" and modifiers, we convened an expert panel during a 3-day workshop to curate a comprehensive list of PED patient care components and modifiers affecting physician workload using a modified Delphi process. Experts completed a pilot version of the NASA-TLX-derived workload survey for each care component. A virtual follow-up was held 5 months after the initial meeting to finalize the list of modifiers and care components.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 93 initial care elements and 75 modifiers, 46 care components were retained, alongside 6 final modifiers. Preliminary workload scores showed \"high acuity, low occurrence procedures (cricothyroidotomy, thoracotomy, pericardiocentesis, burr hole, etc.),\" with the highest median workload score of 106, while \"immobilization device simple (prefabricated)\" had the lowest median workload score of 22.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SWAMPED, derived through expert consensus, holds promise as a standardized assessment tool for PED physician workload. Validation studies involving larger cohorts are crucial for refining the SWAMPED and allowing widespread adoption of this novel quantitative workload metric.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to develop a comprehensive list of patient care components performed by pediatric emergency department (PED) physicians that could be individually scored on their subjective workload using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). These "care components," alongside patient and environmental factors that influence workload ("modifiers"), will form the basis of the Standardized Workload Assessment Metric for Pediatric Emergency Departments (SWAMPED). We sought to obtain preliminary workload scores for each care component and assess the face validity of the NASA-TLX-derived workload tool.

Methods: After establishing a working list of "care elements" and modifiers, we convened an expert panel during a 3-day workshop to curate a comprehensive list of PED patient care components and modifiers affecting physician workload using a modified Delphi process. Experts completed a pilot version of the NASA-TLX-derived workload survey for each care component. A virtual follow-up was held 5 months after the initial meeting to finalize the list of modifiers and care components.

Results: Of the 93 initial care elements and 75 modifiers, 46 care components were retained, alongside 6 final modifiers. Preliminary workload scores showed "high acuity, low occurrence procedures (cricothyroidotomy, thoracotomy, pericardiocentesis, burr hole, etc.)," with the highest median workload score of 106, while "immobilization device simple (prefabricated)" had the lowest median workload score of 22.

Conclusions: The SWAMPED, derived through expert consensus, holds promise as a standardized assessment tool for PED physician workload. Validation studies involving larger cohorts are crucial for refining the SWAMPED and allowing widespread adoption of this novel quantitative workload metric.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信