Deep learning-based segmentation of head and neck organs at risk on CBCT images with dosimetric assessment for radiotherapy.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Lucía Cubero, Cédric Hémon, Anaïs Barateau, Joël Castelli, Renaud de Crevoisier, Oscar Acosta, Javier Pascau
{"title":"Deep learning-based segmentation of head and neck organs at risk on CBCT images with dosimetric assessment for radiotherapy.","authors":"Lucía Cubero, Cédric Hémon, Anaïs Barateau, Joël Castelli, Renaud de Crevoisier, Oscar Acosta, Javier Pascau","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/adbf63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become an essential tool in head and neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy (RT) treatment delivery. Automatic segmentation of the organs at risk (OARs) on CBCT can trigger and accelerate treatment replanning but is still a challenge due to the poor soft tissue contrast, artifacts, and limited field-of-view of these images, alongside the lack of large, annotated datasets to train deep learning (DL) models. This study aims to develop a comprehensive framework to segment 25 HN OARs on CBCT to facilitate treatment replanning.<i>Approach.</i>The proposed framework was developed in three steps: (i) refining an in-house framework to segment 25 OARs on CT; (ii) training a DL model to segment the same OARs on synthetic CT (sCT) images derived from CBCT using contours propagated from CT as ground truth, integrating high-contrast information from CT and texture features of sCT; and (iii) validating the clinical relevance of sCT segmentations through a dosimetric analysis on an external cohort.<i>Main results.</i>Most OARs achieved a dice score coefficient over 70%, with mean average surface distances of 1.30 mm for CT and 1.27 mm for sCT. The dosimetric analysis demonstrated a strong agreement in the mean dose and D2 (%) values, with most OARs showing non-significant differences between automatic CT and sCT segmentations.<i>Significance.</i>These results support the feasibility and clinical relevance of using DL models for OAR segmentation on both CT and CBCT for HNC RT.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adbf63","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become an essential tool in head and neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy (RT) treatment delivery. Automatic segmentation of the organs at risk (OARs) on CBCT can trigger and accelerate treatment replanning but is still a challenge due to the poor soft tissue contrast, artifacts, and limited field-of-view of these images, alongside the lack of large, annotated datasets to train deep learning (DL) models. This study aims to develop a comprehensive framework to segment 25 HN OARs on CBCT to facilitate treatment replanning.Approach.The proposed framework was developed in three steps: (i) refining an in-house framework to segment 25 OARs on CT; (ii) training a DL model to segment the same OARs on synthetic CT (sCT) images derived from CBCT using contours propagated from CT as ground truth, integrating high-contrast information from CT and texture features of sCT; and (iii) validating the clinical relevance of sCT segmentations through a dosimetric analysis on an external cohort.Main results.Most OARs achieved a dice score coefficient over 70%, with mean average surface distances of 1.30 mm for CT and 1.27 mm for sCT. The dosimetric analysis demonstrated a strong agreement in the mean dose and D2 (%) values, with most OARs showing non-significant differences between automatic CT and sCT segmentations.Significance.These results support the feasibility and clinical relevance of using DL models for OAR segmentation on both CT and CBCT for HNC RT.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信