The ethics of intimacy and sexuality of older adults living in nursing homes: A systematic review of argument-based literature.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Ilse Cornu, Wim Vandewiele, Chris Gastmans
{"title":"The ethics of intimacy and sexuality of older adults living in nursing homes: A systematic review of argument-based literature.","authors":"Ilse Cornu, Wim Vandewiele, Chris Gastmans","doi":"10.1177/09697330251324301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Admission to a nursing home does not automatically blunt the desire or reduce the need for intimacy and sexuality in older residents. This ageist and ableist stereotype that older people are asexual or post-sexual negatively affects nurses and other healthcare professionals, as they are regularly faced with residents' sexual expressions. How are nurses to view and respond appropriately if a clear understanding of current ethical concepts and argumentations about intimacy and sexuality in older adults is lacking? This study aimed to document and better understand current ethical concepts and arguments about intimacy and sexuality in institutionalised older adults. We used PRISMA and Reporting of Systematic Reviews in Ethics guidelines in a systematic review of current ethical literature (2010 to 2023). Six databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, Atla, and Philosopher's Index. Inclusion criteria were (1) publication was argument-based; (2) contained ethical concepts and arguments concerning intimacy and/or sexuality in institutionalised older adults; and (3) written in English, French, German, or Dutch. Our search returned 4371 publications; of those, 29 publications met our inclusion criteria. Since all included articles appeared in peer-reviewed journals, article quality was assumed to be sufficiently good. Our use of a modified version of the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven showed that two main approaches characterised discussions of intimacy and sexuality in institutionalised older adults: (1) individual-cognitive-oriented approach and (2) relational-embodied-oriented approach. The first emphasises respect for autonomy and consent, fundamental to protecting rights and dignity. The second focusses on intentional bodily capacities and the interdependent nature of being human, both crucial for the emotional well-being of the residents, even when cognitive abilities decline. We conclude that the ethical landscape on sexuality in ageing has shifted, implying that changes are warranted on how ethicists, society, and healthcare professionals view sexual expressions of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251324301"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251324301","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Admission to a nursing home does not automatically blunt the desire or reduce the need for intimacy and sexuality in older residents. This ageist and ableist stereotype that older people are asexual or post-sexual negatively affects nurses and other healthcare professionals, as they are regularly faced with residents' sexual expressions. How are nurses to view and respond appropriately if a clear understanding of current ethical concepts and argumentations about intimacy and sexuality in older adults is lacking? This study aimed to document and better understand current ethical concepts and arguments about intimacy and sexuality in institutionalised older adults. We used PRISMA and Reporting of Systematic Reviews in Ethics guidelines in a systematic review of current ethical literature (2010 to 2023). Six databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, Atla, and Philosopher's Index. Inclusion criteria were (1) publication was argument-based; (2) contained ethical concepts and arguments concerning intimacy and/or sexuality in institutionalised older adults; and (3) written in English, French, German, or Dutch. Our search returned 4371 publications; of those, 29 publications met our inclusion criteria. Since all included articles appeared in peer-reviewed journals, article quality was assumed to be sufficiently good. Our use of a modified version of the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven showed that two main approaches characterised discussions of intimacy and sexuality in institutionalised older adults: (1) individual-cognitive-oriented approach and (2) relational-embodied-oriented approach. The first emphasises respect for autonomy and consent, fundamental to protecting rights and dignity. The second focusses on intentional bodily capacities and the interdependent nature of being human, both crucial for the emotional well-being of the residents, even when cognitive abilities decline. We conclude that the ethical landscape on sexuality in ageing has shifted, implying that changes are warranted on how ethicists, society, and healthcare professionals view sexual expressions of older adults.

生活在养老院的老年人的亲密和性伦理:基于论证的文献的系统回顾。
入住养老院并不会自动减弱老年居民对亲密关系和性行为的渴望或减少需求。认为老年人是无性恋或后性恋的这种年龄歧视和能力歧视的刻板印象对护士和其他医疗保健专业人员产生了负面影响,因为他们经常面对居民的性表达。如果缺乏对当前关于老年人亲密关系和性行为的道德概念和争论的清晰理解,护士如何看待和适当地作出反应?这项研究旨在记录和更好地理解目前关于养老院老年人亲密关系和性行为的伦理观念和争论。我们在对当前伦理学文献(2010年至2023年)的系统综述中使用了PRISMA和伦理学指南中的系统评价报告。检索了六个数据库:PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, Atla和Philosopher's Index。纳入标准为(1)发表论文是基于论证的;(2)包含有关机构老年人的亲密关系和/或性行为的伦理概念和论点;(3)用英语、法语、德语或荷兰语写成。我们检索了4371篇出版物;其中,29篇出版物符合我们的纳入标准。由于所有纳入的文章都发表在同行评议的期刊上,文章质量被认为足够好。我们对鲁汶定性分析指南的修改版本的使用表明,在制度化的老年人中讨论亲密和性行为的主要方法有两种:(1)个人认知导向的方法和(2)关系体现导向的方法。第一种强调尊重自主权和同意,这是保护权利和尊严的根本。第二个重点是有意识的身体能力和人类相互依赖的本质,这两者对居民的情感健康至关重要,即使在认知能力下降的情况下也是如此。我们的结论是,老年性行为的伦理景观已经发生了变化,这意味着伦理学家、社会和医疗保健专业人员如何看待老年人的性表达是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信