Understanding post-operative opioid use across multiple surgical specialties.

Q3 Medicine
R Wesley Vosburg, Kortney A Robinson
{"title":"Understanding post-operative opioid use across multiple surgical specialties.","authors":"R Wesley Vosburg, Kortney A Robinson","doi":"10.5055/jom.0826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The United States (US) is facing an opioid epidemic. Prescribed opioids are a contributor to this national issue. Strategies to reduce opioid prescriptions are a high priority. This study was designed to generate patient-level data on opioid use after surgery across different surgical specialties. We showed these data to surgeons and evaluated the impact it would have on their practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey-based study was performed in a teaching community hospital in the US. Adult patients who underwent an operation by a member of the Department of Surgery and the surgeons who performed these operations were surveyed. Patient-level data were obtained on opioid use after surgery. The number of opioid tablets taken and days on opioids were recorded. Patients were assessed for the frequency of recovery from surgery without opioids. Additionally, information on prescriptions filled and unused opioid disposal was collected. These data were presented to surgeons who responded on how having access to it may change their future prescribing habits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Opioid consumption after surgery was found to be far below expert panel guidelines across surgical specialties. Orthopedic surgery was found to be associated with significantly higher opioid use in the post-operative period. The small number of surgeons who responded showed that a large percentage planned to change opioid prescribing habits after gaining access to these data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This project contributes to the growing body of literature showing lower than expected opioid usage for patients after surgery. Previous trends were mostly generated from large academic centers, and this community hospital data show consistent findings of patients being left with significant quantities of unused opioids routinely after surgery. It highlights the need for evidence-based prescribing recommendations as well as the need for better education and access to opioid disposal for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"21 1","pages":"41-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The United States (US) is facing an opioid epidemic. Prescribed opioids are a contributor to this national issue. Strategies to reduce opioid prescriptions are a high priority. This study was designed to generate patient-level data on opioid use after surgery across different surgical specialties. We showed these data to surgeons and evaluated the impact it would have on their practice.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey-based study was performed in a teaching community hospital in the US. Adult patients who underwent an operation by a member of the Department of Surgery and the surgeons who performed these operations were surveyed. Patient-level data were obtained on opioid use after surgery. The number of opioid tablets taken and days on opioids were recorded. Patients were assessed for the frequency of recovery from surgery without opioids. Additionally, information on prescriptions filled and unused opioid disposal was collected. These data were presented to surgeons who responded on how having access to it may change their future prescribing habits.

Results: Opioid consumption after surgery was found to be far below expert panel guidelines across surgical specialties. Orthopedic surgery was found to be associated with significantly higher opioid use in the post-operative period. The small number of surgeons who responded showed that a large percentage planned to change opioid prescribing habits after gaining access to these data.

Conclusions: This project contributes to the growing body of literature showing lower than expected opioid usage for patients after surgery. Previous trends were mostly generated from large academic centers, and this community hospital data show consistent findings of patients being left with significant quantities of unused opioids routinely after surgery. It highlights the need for evidence-based prescribing recommendations as well as the need for better education and access to opioid disposal for patients.

了解多个外科专科术后阿片类药物的使用情况。
背景:美国(US)正面临阿片类药物流行。处方阿片类药物是造成这一全国性问题的一个因素。减少阿片类药物处方的战略是一个高度优先事项。本研究旨在生成不同外科专业手术后阿片类药物使用的患者水平数据。我们向外科医生展示了这些数据,并评估了这些数据对他们实践的影响。方法:在美国一家教学社区医院进行横断面调查研究。接受外科成员手术的成年患者和实施这些手术的外科医生进行了调查。获得术后阿片类药物使用的患者水平数据。记录服用阿片类药物的数量和天数。评估患者在不使用阿片类药物的情况下从手术中恢复的频率。此外,还收集了有关处方填写和未使用阿片类药物处置的信息。这些数据被提交给外科医生,他们回答说,获得这些数据可能会如何改变他们未来的处方习惯。结果:发现手术后阿片类药物的消耗远远低于专家小组在外科专业的指南。发现骨科手术与术后阿片类药物的使用显著增加有关。少数回应的外科医生表明,在获得这些数据后,很大一部分人计划改变阿片类药物的处方习惯。结论:该项目有助于越来越多的文献显示手术后患者阿片类药物的使用低于预期。以前的趋势主要来自大型学术中心,而社区医院的数据显示了一致的发现,即患者在手术后常规留下大量未使用的阿片类药物。它强调需要基于证据的处方建议,以及需要为患者提供更好的教育和获得阿片类药物处置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信