The potential impact of alternatives to opioids (ALTO) protocol on opioid reduction in the community emergency department.

Q3 Medicine
Eric H Chou, Toral Bhakta, Ching-Fang Tiffany Tzeng, Andrew Shedd, Jon Wolfshohl, Alec Jessen, Yu-Lin Hsieh, Chinmay Patel, Robin K Chan, Jaydeep Shah, Dahlia Hassani
{"title":"The potential impact of alternatives to opioids (ALTO) protocol on opioid reduction in the community emergency department.","authors":"Eric H Chou, Toral Bhakta, Ching-Fang Tiffany Tzeng, Andrew Shedd, Jon Wolfshohl, Alec Jessen, Yu-Lin Hsieh, Chinmay Patel, Robin K Chan, Jaydeep Shah, Dahlia Hassani","doi":"10.5055/jom.0895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the potential impact of implementing alternatives to opioids (ALTOs) protocol in a community emergency department (ED) in North Texas. We hypothesize that the ALTO protocol is associated with decreased opioid utilization without affecting patient satisfaction to pain control and ED flow.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective, single-center, cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An urban ED.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult patients (age >18 years old) who received pain medications in ED during the study timeframe were included. A total of 34,251 patients were included for final analysis.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Patients receiving pain medication after the implementation of the ALTO protocol during March to August 2019 and patients during the same period from the prior year were identified as the post-protocol group and preprotocol group, respectively.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the change in ED opioid administration. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction to pain control, left without being seen (LWOBS), door-to-doctor time, and turnaround time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total opioid administration rate decreased by 59.6 percent after the implementation of the ALTO protocol. The percentage of patients that LWOBS (p = 0.003) and the average door-to-doctor time (p < 0.001) were significantly decreased in the post-protocol group. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction to pain control (p = 0.192) and average turnaround time (p = 0.209).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of an ALTO protocol was associated with a significant reduction of opioid administration without a negative impact on patient satisfaction regarding pain control and ED flow.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"21 1","pages":"77-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the potential impact of implementing alternatives to opioids (ALTOs) protocol in a community emergency department (ED) in North Texas. We hypothesize that the ALTO protocol is associated with decreased opioid utilization without affecting patient satisfaction to pain control and ED flow.

Design: A retrospective, single-center, cohort study.

Setting: An urban ED.

Participants: Adult patients (age >18 years old) who received pain medications in ED during the study timeframe were included. A total of 34,251 patients were included for final analysis.

Intervention: Patients receiving pain medication after the implementation of the ALTO protocol during March to August 2019 and patients during the same period from the prior year were identified as the post-protocol group and preprotocol group, respectively.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the change in ED opioid administration. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction to pain control, left without being seen (LWOBS), door-to-doctor time, and turnaround time.

Results: The total opioid administration rate decreased by 59.6 percent after the implementation of the ALTO protocol. The percentage of patients that LWOBS (p = 0.003) and the average door-to-doctor time (p < 0.001) were significantly decreased in the post-protocol group. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction to pain control (p = 0.192) and average turnaround time (p = 0.209).

Conclusions: Implementation of an ALTO protocol was associated with a significant reduction of opioid administration without a negative impact on patient satisfaction regarding pain control and ED flow.

阿片类药物替代品(ALTO)协议对社区急诊科阿片类药物减少的潜在影响。
目的:探讨在北德克萨斯州社区急诊科(ED)实施阿片类药物替代方案(ALTOs)的潜在影响。我们假设ALTO方案与减少阿片类药物的使用有关,而不影响患者对疼痛控制和ED流的满意度。设计:回顾性、单中心、队列研究。研究对象:在研究期间在急诊科接受止痛药治疗的成年患者(年龄在100 - 18岁)。共纳入34,251例患者进行最终分析。干预:将2019年3月至8月实施ALTO方案后接受止痛药治疗的患者和上一年同期的患者分别分为方案后组和方案前组。主要结局指标:主要结局是ED阿片类药物给药的改变。次要结局包括患者对疼痛控制的满意度、未就诊(LWOBS)、从门到医生的时间和周转时间。结果:实施ALTO方案后,阿片类药物总给药率下降了59.6%。方案后组LWOBS患者比例(p = 0.003)和平均上门就诊时间(p < 0.001)显著降低。患者对疼痛控制的满意度(p = 0.192)和平均周转时间(p = 0.209)差异无统计学意义。结论:ALTO方案的实施与阿片类药物给药的显著减少有关,而不会对患者对疼痛控制和ED流的满意度产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信