Exploring Acceptance of Digital Health Technologies for Managing Non-Communicable Diseases Among Older Adults: A Systematic Scoping Review.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sadia Azmin Anisha, Arkendu Sen, Badariah Ahmad, Chris Bain
{"title":"Exploring Acceptance of Digital Health Technologies for Managing Non-Communicable Diseases Among Older Adults: A Systematic Scoping Review.","authors":"Sadia Azmin Anisha, Arkendu Sen, Badariah Ahmad, Chris Bain","doi":"10.1007/s10916-025-02166-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review explores the acceptance of digital health (DH) technologies for managing non-communicable diseases (NCDs) among older adults (≥ 50 years), with an extended focus on artificial intelligence (AI)-powered conversational agents (CAs) as an emerging notable subset of DH. A systematic literature search was conducted in June 2024 using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ACM Digital Library. Eligible studies were empirical and published in English between January 2010 and May 2024. Covidence software facilitated screening and data extraction, adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The screening process finally yielded 20 studies. Extracted data from these selected studies included interventions, participant demographics, technology types, sample sizes, study designs and locations, technology acceptance measures, key outcomes, and methodological limitations. A narrative synthesis approach was used for analysis, revealing four key findings: (1) overall positive attitudes of older adults towards DH acceptance; (2) the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) are the most frequently used standard frameworks for evaluating technology acceptance; (3) the key facilitators of technology acceptance include perceived usefulness, ease of use, social influence, and digital or e-health literacy, while barriers involve technical challenges, usability issues, and privacy concerns; (4) the acceptance of AI-based CAs for NCD management among older adults remains inadequately evaluated, possibly due to limited adaptation of established frameworks to specific healthcare contexts and technology innovations. This review significantly contributes to the DH field by providing a comprehensive analysis of technology acceptance for NCD management among older adults, extending beyond feasibility and usability. The findings offer stakeholders valuable insights into how to better integrate these technologies to improve health outcomes and quality of life for older adults. Protocol Registration: PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD42024540035).</p>","PeriodicalId":16338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Systems","volume":"49 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897087/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02166-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review explores the acceptance of digital health (DH) technologies for managing non-communicable diseases (NCDs) among older adults (≥ 50 years), with an extended focus on artificial intelligence (AI)-powered conversational agents (CAs) as an emerging notable subset of DH. A systematic literature search was conducted in June 2024 using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ACM Digital Library. Eligible studies were empirical and published in English between January 2010 and May 2024. Covidence software facilitated screening and data extraction, adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The screening process finally yielded 20 studies. Extracted data from these selected studies included interventions, participant demographics, technology types, sample sizes, study designs and locations, technology acceptance measures, key outcomes, and methodological limitations. A narrative synthesis approach was used for analysis, revealing four key findings: (1) overall positive attitudes of older adults towards DH acceptance; (2) the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) are the most frequently used standard frameworks for evaluating technology acceptance; (3) the key facilitators of technology acceptance include perceived usefulness, ease of use, social influence, and digital or e-health literacy, while barriers involve technical challenges, usability issues, and privacy concerns; (4) the acceptance of AI-based CAs for NCD management among older adults remains inadequately evaluated, possibly due to limited adaptation of established frameworks to specific healthcare contexts and technology innovations. This review significantly contributes to the DH field by providing a comprehensive analysis of technology acceptance for NCD management among older adults, extending beyond feasibility and usability. The findings offer stakeholders valuable insights into how to better integrate these technologies to improve health outcomes and quality of life for older adults. Protocol Registration: PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD42024540035).

探索接受数字医疗技术管理老年人非传染性疾病:系统范围审查。
本综述探讨了数字健康(DH)技术在老年人(≥50岁)中管理非传染性疾病(NCDs)的接受程度,并将重点扩展到人工智能(AI)驱动的对话代理(ca)作为DH的一个新兴的值得注意的子集。于2024年6月使用PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和ACM数字图书馆进行了系统的文献检索。符合条件的研究是实证研究,并在2010年1月至2024年5月期间以英文发表。根据PRISMA-ScR指南,冠状病毒软件促进了筛查和数据提取。筛选过程最终产生了20项研究。从这些选定的研究中提取的数据包括干预措施、参与者人口统计、技术类型、样本量、研究设计和地点、技术接受措施、关键结果和方法局限性。采用叙事综合方法进行分析,揭示了四个主要发现:(1)老年人对接受健康照护的总体积极态度;(2)技术接受模型(TAM)和技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT)是评估技术接受度最常用的标准框架;(3)技术接受的主要促进因素包括感知有用性、易用性、社会影响力以及数字或电子卫生素养,而障碍涉及技术挑战、可用性问题和隐私问题;(4)老年人对基于人工智能的ca进行非传染性疾病管理的接受程度仍未得到充分评估,这可能是由于既定框架对特定医疗环境和技术创新的适应有限。这篇综述通过提供老年人非传染性疾病管理技术接受度的全面分析,超越了可行性和可用性,对卫生保健领域做出了重大贡献。这些发现为利益相关者提供了宝贵的见解,让他们了解如何更好地整合这些技术,以改善老年人的健康结果和生活质量。协议注册:PROSPERO(注册ID: CRD42024540035)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Systems
Journal of Medical Systems 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Systems provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of the increasingly extensive applications of new systems techniques and methods in hospital clinic and physician''s office administration; pathology radiology and pharmaceutical delivery systems; medical records storage and retrieval; and ancillary patient-support systems. The journal publishes informative articles essays and studies across the entire scale of medical systems from large hospital programs to novel small-scale medical services. Education is an integral part of this amalgamation of sciences and selected articles are published in this area. Since existing medical systems are constantly being modified to fit particular circumstances and to solve specific problems the journal includes a special section devoted to status reports on current installations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信