Comparative risk of major health events among individuals prescribed different antiseizure medications following ischemic stroke.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1111/epi.18336
Stella Jung-Hyun Kim, Clara Marquina, Emma Foster, J Simon Bell, Jenni Ilomäki
{"title":"Comparative risk of major health events among individuals prescribed different antiseizure medications following ischemic stroke.","authors":"Stella Jung-Hyun Kim, Clara Marquina, Emma Foster, J Simon Bell, Jenni Ilomäki","doi":"10.1111/epi.18336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the risk of seizure, recurrent stroke, fall or fracture, and mortality in individuals prescribed different antiseizure medications (ASMs) following an ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified all patients admitted to a Victorian public or private hospital with a principal diagnosis of an incident ischemic stroke between 2013 and 2017 and dispensed an ASM within 12 months of discharge. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the risk of cause-specific rehospitalization or emergency department visits (seizure, fall or fracture, recurrent stroke) and all-cause mortality over a 2-year period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to each model to adjust for baseline covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 19 601 individuals hospitalized for incident ischemic stroke, 897 initiated ASM treatment within 12 months. More than three quarters were initiated on a non-enzyme-inducing ASM (78.0%). Levetiracetam (41.9%), valproate (28.4%), and carbamazepine (11.4%) were commonly dispensed initial ASMs. Non-enzyme-inducing ASMs demonstrated similar risk of seizure (hazard ratio [HR] = .93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .63-1.37), fall or fracture (HR = 1.47, 95% CI = .92-2.34), stroke (HR = .83; 95% CI = .52-1.33), and mortality (HR = .96; 95% CI = .69-1.32) compared to enzyme-inducing ASMs. However, when valproate was grouped as a separate class, non-enzyme-inducing ASMs (HR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.04-2.71) showed higher risk of fall or fracture compared to enzyme-inducing ASMs.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>At a population level, ASMs of different types showed no significant differences in the risk of hospitalization or emergency department presentation for seizure, fall or fracture, stroke, and mortality within 2 years of an incident stroke presentation, suggesting similar short-term health outcomes in a real-world setting. Future research should investigate decision-making around ASM choice for stroke survivors and examine the impact of long-term ASM exposure on health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18336","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the risk of seizure, recurrent stroke, fall or fracture, and mortality in individuals prescribed different antiseizure medications (ASMs) following an ischemic stroke.

Methods: We identified all patients admitted to a Victorian public or private hospital with a principal diagnosis of an incident ischemic stroke between 2013 and 2017 and dispensed an ASM within 12 months of discharge. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the risk of cause-specific rehospitalization or emergency department visits (seizure, fall or fracture, recurrent stroke) and all-cause mortality over a 2-year period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to each model to adjust for baseline covariates.

Results: Of 19 601 individuals hospitalized for incident ischemic stroke, 897 initiated ASM treatment within 12 months. More than three quarters were initiated on a non-enzyme-inducing ASM (78.0%). Levetiracetam (41.9%), valproate (28.4%), and carbamazepine (11.4%) were commonly dispensed initial ASMs. Non-enzyme-inducing ASMs demonstrated similar risk of seizure (hazard ratio [HR] = .93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .63-1.37), fall or fracture (HR = 1.47, 95% CI = .92-2.34), stroke (HR = .83; 95% CI = .52-1.33), and mortality (HR = .96; 95% CI = .69-1.32) compared to enzyme-inducing ASMs. However, when valproate was grouped as a separate class, non-enzyme-inducing ASMs (HR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.04-2.71) showed higher risk of fall or fracture compared to enzyme-inducing ASMs.

Significance: At a population level, ASMs of different types showed no significant differences in the risk of hospitalization or emergency department presentation for seizure, fall or fracture, stroke, and mortality within 2 years of an incident stroke presentation, suggesting similar short-term health outcomes in a real-world setting. Future research should investigate decision-making around ASM choice for stroke survivors and examine the impact of long-term ASM exposure on health outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信