Does voıce therapy after endolarygeal mıcrosurgery contrıbute to the treatment of vocal fold polyp?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Gökhan Toptas, Emel Çadallı Tatar, Kemal Keseroğlu, Mustafa Şahin, Elife Barmak, Esma Altan, Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz
{"title":"Does voıce therapy after endolarygeal mıcrosurgery contrıbute to the treatment of vocal fold polyp?","authors":"Gökhan Toptas, Emel Çadallı Tatar, Kemal Keseroğlu, Mustafa Şahin, Elife Barmak, Esma Altan, Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz","doi":"10.1159/000545213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>İntroduction: The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of voice therapy to management of patients following surgery for vocal fold polyps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, two groups were created by randomizing patients diagnosed with vocal fold polyps. Group 1 received only phonosurgery, and Group 2 received phonosurgery followed by voice therapy. Subjective test methods conducted before and after treatment were evaluated comparatively. Videolaryngostroboscopy, the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10), and voice analysis parameters, including fundamental frequency variation (vF0), jitter percent (Jitt%), shimmer percent (Shim%), Noise-to-Harmonic ratio (NHR), and maximum phonation time (MPT), were compared before and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data of 40 patients, 15 (37.5%) women and 25 (62.5%) man were examined in this study. Significant reductions were observed in the pre- and post-treatment values in the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and GRBAS scale (p < 0.001). In terms of aerodynamic analysis, a decrease was observed in the S/Z ratio in both groups after treatment.Regarding maximum phonation time (MPT), a statistically significant increase was observed following treatment in (1) both groups (p < 0.001) and (2) Group 2 versus Group 1 (p < 0.001).In terms of acoustic voice analysis, both groups showed an increase in fundamental frequency (F0) and a statistically significant decrease in jitter and shimmer values. When comparing these parameter changes, it was observed that Group 2 had a statistically significant difference compared to Group 1 (F0; Jitt; Shim; p = 0.082; p = 0.014; p = 0.035, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study comparing the outcomes of vocal fold polyp treatment using only surgery versus surgery combined with voice therapy, it was found that the addition of voice therapy to endolaryngeal phonosurgery provided a significant positive contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

İntroduction: The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of voice therapy to management of patients following surgery for vocal fold polyps.

Methods: In this prospective study, two groups were created by randomizing patients diagnosed with vocal fold polyps. Group 1 received only phonosurgery, and Group 2 received phonosurgery followed by voice therapy. Subjective test methods conducted before and after treatment were evaluated comparatively. Videolaryngostroboscopy, the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10), and voice analysis parameters, including fundamental frequency variation (vF0), jitter percent (Jitt%), shimmer percent (Shim%), Noise-to-Harmonic ratio (NHR), and maximum phonation time (MPT), were compared before and after treatment.

Results: The data of 40 patients, 15 (37.5%) women and 25 (62.5%) man were examined in this study. Significant reductions were observed in the pre- and post-treatment values in the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and GRBAS scale (p < 0.001). In terms of aerodynamic analysis, a decrease was observed in the S/Z ratio in both groups after treatment.Regarding maximum phonation time (MPT), a statistically significant increase was observed following treatment in (1) both groups (p < 0.001) and (2) Group 2 versus Group 1 (p < 0.001).In terms of acoustic voice analysis, both groups showed an increase in fundamental frequency (F0) and a statistically significant decrease in jitter and shimmer values. When comparing these parameter changes, it was observed that Group 2 had a statistically significant difference compared to Group 1 (F0; Jitt; Shim; p = 0.082; p = 0.014; p = 0.035, respectively).

Conclusion: In this study comparing the outcomes of vocal fold polyp treatment using only surgery versus surgery combined with voice therapy, it was found that the addition of voice therapy to endolaryngeal phonosurgery provided a significant positive contribution.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1947, ''Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica'' provides a forum for international research on the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of structures of the speech, language, and hearing mechanisms. Original papers published in this journal report new findings on basic function, assessment, management, and test development in communication sciences and disorders, as well as experiments designed to test specific theories of speech, language, and hearing function. Review papers of high quality are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信