A Participatory Survey to Investigate the Long-Term Effectiveness of Adult Psychiatric Services (PSILEAPS): Baseline Data and Recruitment Experiences.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Tomi Bergström, Tapio Gauffin, Teija Hietasaari, Nina Koivuniemi, Anne Leinonen, Enni Öfverberg, Reetta Viitakoski, Timo Haaraniemi, Katja Partanen, Katariina Rantamaa, Vilhelmiina Yrjänheikki, Tiina Jauhiainen, Annika Olli, Jouko Miettunen, Jouni Petäjäniemi
{"title":"A Participatory Survey to Investigate the Long-Term Effectiveness of Adult Psychiatric Services (PSILEAPS): Baseline Data and Recruitment Experiences.","authors":"Tomi Bergström, Tapio Gauffin, Teija Hietasaari, Nina Koivuniemi, Anne Leinonen, Enni Öfverberg, Reetta Viitakoski, Timo Haaraniemi, Katja Partanen, Katariina Rantamaa, Vilhelmiina Yrjänheikki, Tiina Jauhiainen, Annika Olli, Jouko Miettunen, Jouni Petäjäniemi","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01462-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In clinical psychology and psychiatry, traditional hypothesis testing is challenging due to the subjective and contextual nature of the studied phenomenon. To address this, more exploratory and participatory research is needed. This paper reports recruitment experiences and baseline data of a prospective exploratory cohort study with participatory elements, initiated in mental health services in one Finnish region. The primary aims, design, and survey for data collection were developed through community meetings involving local mental health workers, peer experts, and service users. Over 2 weeks, all mental health service users, their care teams, and social network members were asked to share their views on the reasons for needing services and what aspects of treatment have been or could be helpful or unhelpful. Descriptive statistics summarized baseline data, and simple thematic analysis examined field notes on supporting and hindering aspects of the study design. A total of 117 service users, 54 care team members, and 34 social network members participated, with a service user attrition rate of 40-50%. The study achieved 79% of the target sample size. Women and participants with mood disorder diagnoses and long-term service usage were overrepresented. Findings suggest that integrating participatory research into Finnish public mental health services would require additional resources. Despite its limitations, the collected data will facilitate exploratory research into real-life mental health treatment processes from various perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01462-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In clinical psychology and psychiatry, traditional hypothesis testing is challenging due to the subjective and contextual nature of the studied phenomenon. To address this, more exploratory and participatory research is needed. This paper reports recruitment experiences and baseline data of a prospective exploratory cohort study with participatory elements, initiated in mental health services in one Finnish region. The primary aims, design, and survey for data collection were developed through community meetings involving local mental health workers, peer experts, and service users. Over 2 weeks, all mental health service users, their care teams, and social network members were asked to share their views on the reasons for needing services and what aspects of treatment have been or could be helpful or unhelpful. Descriptive statistics summarized baseline data, and simple thematic analysis examined field notes on supporting and hindering aspects of the study design. A total of 117 service users, 54 care team members, and 34 social network members participated, with a service user attrition rate of 40-50%. The study achieved 79% of the target sample size. Women and participants with mood disorder diagnoses and long-term service usage were overrepresented. Findings suggest that integrating participatory research into Finnish public mental health services would require additional resources. Despite its limitations, the collected data will facilitate exploratory research into real-life mental health treatment processes from various perspectives.

一项调查成人精神病学服务(PSILEAPS)长期有效性的参与性调查:基线数据和招募经验。
在临床心理学和精神病学中,由于研究现象的主观性和背景性,传统的假设检验具有挑战性。为此,需要开展更多探索性和参与性研究。本文报告了一项前瞻性探索性队列研究的招募经验和基线数据,该研究在芬兰一个地区的心理健康服务机构启动,包含参与性元素。研究的主要目的、设计和数据收集调查都是通过社区会议制定的,与会者包括当地的心理健康工作者、同侪专家和服务使用者。在为期两周的时间里,所有精神健康服务使用者、他们的护理团队和社会网络成员都被要求分享他们对需要服务的原因以及治疗的哪些方面已经或可能有所帮助或没有帮助的看法。描述性统计对基线数据进行了总结,简单的主题分析对研究设计中的支持和阻碍方面进行了现场记录。共有 117 名服务使用者、54 名护理团队成员和 34 名社会网络成员参与了研究,服务使用者的流失率为 40%-50%。研究达到了目标样本量的 79%。女性以及被诊断患有情绪障碍和长期使用服务的参与者比例较高。研究结果表明,将参与式研究融入芬兰公共心理健康服务需要额外的资源。尽管存在局限性,但收集到的数据将有助于从不同角度对现实生活中的心理健康治疗过程进行探索性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信