'When global health meets global goals': assessing the alignment between antimicrobial resistance and sustainable development policies in 10 African and Asian countries.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Luong Nguyen Thanh, Didier Wernli, Mats Målqvist, Peter Søgaard Jørgensen
{"title":"'When global health meets global goals': assessing the alignment between antimicrobial resistance and sustainable development policies in 10 African and Asian countries.","authors":"Luong Nguyen Thanh, Didier Wernli, Mats Målqvist, Peter Søgaard Jørgensen","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sustainable development goals (SDGs) may play a pivotal role in mitigating antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study examines how countries can integrate AMR mitigation with sustainable development strategies, providing evidence on the prioritisation of AMR-related efforts within both agendas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comparative analysis of the international global action plan (GAP) and national action plan (NAP) on AMR and SDGs across 10 countries in Africa and Asia. We employed content analysis to map actions to AMR drivers, descriptive statistics to summarise the coverage and focus of the actions and inferential statistics to explore factors associated with the level of policy alignment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings highlight gaps in the current AMR policy landscape, where drivers are at risk of being redundantly addressed, narrowly focused or entirely overlooked. At the international level, over 50% of AMR drivers are addressed by both frameworks, but national-level overlap is lower (10.5%-47.4%), with Asian countries showing stronger alignment than African countries. Asian countries show a higher proportion of shared drivers than African countries. A considerable proportion of drivers are addressed solely by AMR-NAPs (23.7%-60.5%) or SDG-NAPs (13.2%-31.6%), raising concerns that actions may benefit either sustainable development or AMR at the expense of the other. Finally, 10.5%-26.3% of drivers, mostly distal, are not acknowledged by either framework, highlighting potential policy blind spots.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Agenda 2030 includes ambitious and cross-cutting goals with GAP-AMR, therefore it can facilitate intersectoral collaboration in addressing AMR. The effective implementation of both agendas will depend on national governments' capacity to ensure that efforts in combating AMR also contribute to sustainable development.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sustainable development goals (SDGs) may play a pivotal role in mitigating antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study examines how countries can integrate AMR mitigation with sustainable development strategies, providing evidence on the prioritisation of AMR-related efforts within both agendas.

Methods: We conducted a comparative analysis of the international global action plan (GAP) and national action plan (NAP) on AMR and SDGs across 10 countries in Africa and Asia. We employed content analysis to map actions to AMR drivers, descriptive statistics to summarise the coverage and focus of the actions and inferential statistics to explore factors associated with the level of policy alignment.

Results: Our findings highlight gaps in the current AMR policy landscape, where drivers are at risk of being redundantly addressed, narrowly focused or entirely overlooked. At the international level, over 50% of AMR drivers are addressed by both frameworks, but national-level overlap is lower (10.5%-47.4%), with Asian countries showing stronger alignment than African countries. Asian countries show a higher proportion of shared drivers than African countries. A considerable proportion of drivers are addressed solely by AMR-NAPs (23.7%-60.5%) or SDG-NAPs (13.2%-31.6%), raising concerns that actions may benefit either sustainable development or AMR at the expense of the other. Finally, 10.5%-26.3% of drivers, mostly distal, are not acknowledged by either framework, highlighting potential policy blind spots.

Conclusions: The Agenda 2030 includes ambitious and cross-cutting goals with GAP-AMR, therefore it can facilitate intersectoral collaboration in addressing AMR. The effective implementation of both agendas will depend on national governments' capacity to ensure that efforts in combating AMR also contribute to sustainable development.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信