Video-assessment of Surgical Performance in Robotic Gastro-enterostomy During Pancreatoduodenectomy: Evaluating the Learning Curve and Risk of Delayed Gastric Emptying.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Maurice J W Zwart, Bram L J van den Broek, Diederik S J Paijens, Sabrina L M Zwetsloot, Annalisa Comandatore, Olivier R Busch, T C Khé Tran, Misha D Luyer, Jennifer Schreinemakers, Jan H Wijsman, George P van der Schelling, Ignace H J T de Hingh, J Sven D Mieog, Bert A Bonsing, Kosei Takagi, Roeland F de Wilde, Luca Morelli, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H Zureikat, Melissa E Hogg, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Marc G Besselink
{"title":"Video-assessment of Surgical Performance in Robotic Gastro-enterostomy During Pancreatoduodenectomy: Evaluating the Learning Curve and Risk of Delayed Gastric Emptying.","authors":"Maurice J W Zwart, Bram L J van den Broek, Diederik S J Paijens, Sabrina L M Zwetsloot, Annalisa Comandatore, Olivier R Busch, T C Khé Tran, Misha D Luyer, Jennifer Schreinemakers, Jan H Wijsman, George P van der Schelling, Ignace H J T de Hingh, J Sven D Mieog, Bert A Bonsing, Kosei Takagi, Roeland F de Wilde, Luca Morelli, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H Zureikat, Melissa E Hogg, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Marc G Besselink","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to identify learning curves for robotic gastro-enterostomy (RGE) during RPD and the predictive value of the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) score for DGE according to the Birkmeyer et al and UPMC method.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>In some series, robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) has been associated with increased risk of delayed gastric emptying (DGE). It is unclear whether this is attributable to learning curve. Improved surgical performance and experience has not yet been linked to a decrease in delayed gastric emptying in RPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-hoc study of the prospective multicenter (LAELAPS-3) training program including videos of RGE during RPD. Surgical performance was scored with OSATS by two blinded graders. The main outcomes are the combined OSATS scores of two blinded graders over time (learning curve). Secondary outcome is the correlation between OSATS scores and clinically relevant DGE (grade B/C).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Videos from 192 RGE anastomoses were included. DGE occurred in 42/192 (21.9%) patients. Mean OSATS score was 22.4 (SD±5.1) and predicted DGE (AUC 0.668, P<0.001). The predictive OSATS elements for DGE were gentleness (AUC 0.719, P<0.001), instrument handling (AUC 0.595 P=0.043), tissue exposure (AUC 0.625, P=0.009), and summary score (AUC 0.665, P<0.001). An OSATS score >25 was associated with a 59.9% reduced relative risk of grade B/C DGE (11.3% (8/71) vs 28.1% (34/121); OR 0.325, P=0.006). CUSUM analysis of RGE-OSATS identified a turning point at 34 procedures (27.5% (36/140) before vs 11.5% (6/52) after; OR 0.156, P=0.035. On multivariable analysis for grade B/C DGE, OSATS ≤25 remained an independent risk factor (OR 2.907, P=0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Better surgical performance during gastro-enteric anastomosis in RPD, as assessed by OSATS, is associated with a reduced rate of grade B/C DGE. OSATS could serve as a tool for competency-based training programs and quality-controlled implementation of RPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006692","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to identify learning curves for robotic gastro-enterostomy (RGE) during RPD and the predictive value of the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) score for DGE according to the Birkmeyer et al and UPMC method.

Summary of background data: In some series, robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) has been associated with increased risk of delayed gastric emptying (DGE). It is unclear whether this is attributable to learning curve. Improved surgical performance and experience has not yet been linked to a decrease in delayed gastric emptying in RPD.

Methods: Post-hoc study of the prospective multicenter (LAELAPS-3) training program including videos of RGE during RPD. Surgical performance was scored with OSATS by two blinded graders. The main outcomes are the combined OSATS scores of two blinded graders over time (learning curve). Secondary outcome is the correlation between OSATS scores and clinically relevant DGE (grade B/C).

Results: Videos from 192 RGE anastomoses were included. DGE occurred in 42/192 (21.9%) patients. Mean OSATS score was 22.4 (SD±5.1) and predicted DGE (AUC 0.668, P<0.001). The predictive OSATS elements for DGE were gentleness (AUC 0.719, P<0.001), instrument handling (AUC 0.595 P=0.043), tissue exposure (AUC 0.625, P=0.009), and summary score (AUC 0.665, P<0.001). An OSATS score >25 was associated with a 59.9% reduced relative risk of grade B/C DGE (11.3% (8/71) vs 28.1% (34/121); OR 0.325, P=0.006). CUSUM analysis of RGE-OSATS identified a turning point at 34 procedures (27.5% (36/140) before vs 11.5% (6/52) after; OR 0.156, P=0.035. On multivariable analysis for grade B/C DGE, OSATS ≤25 remained an independent risk factor (OR 2.907, P=0.028).

Conclusions: Better surgical performance during gastro-enteric anastomosis in RPD, as assessed by OSATS, is associated with a reduced rate of grade B/C DGE. OSATS could serve as a tool for competency-based training programs and quality-controlled implementation of RPD.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信