Parturients' perspectives on labor pain and epidural analgesia: A protocol for an explorative qualitative study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Louise Højstrup, Søs Bohart, Line Thellesen, Kim Wildgaard
{"title":"Parturients' perspectives on labor pain and epidural analgesia: A protocol for an explorative qualitative study.","authors":"Louise Højstrup, Søs Bohart, Line Thellesen, Kim Wildgaard","doi":"10.1111/aas.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childbirth is a significant life event often accompanied by intense pain. Although pain perception is highly subjective and influenced by multiple factors, its management is frequently focused solely on pain intensity. Epidural analgesia (EA) is the most effective form of labor pain relief; however, there is limited qualitative research on which aspects of pain relief parturients perceive as successful with EA. Understanding parturients' perspectives on successful pain relief with EA can help improve patient-centered care and enhance labor pain management strategies.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This qualitative study aims to explore parturients' perspectives on successful pain management during labor with EA, identifying key aspects that contribute to their overall childbirth experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative, semi-structured interview study will be conducted at Herlev Hospital, Denmark. Approximately 10-15 parturients who received EA during labor will be recruited using purposive sampling within 24 hours postpartum. Interviews will be recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework. Data collection will continue until sufficient information power is reached.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>The study has been approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (case no. P-2025-18241) and adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants, and data will be anonymized to ensure confidentiality.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>The study is expected to generate new insights into parturients' experiences of labor pain and EA, contributing to the development of patient-reported outcome measures and informing future clinical practice. Findings may also support the creation of standardized pain assessment tools and influence policies on labor pain management.</p><p><strong>Dissemination: </strong>Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences to inform both clinical practice and future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 4","pages":"e70018"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Childbirth is a significant life event often accompanied by intense pain. Although pain perception is highly subjective and influenced by multiple factors, its management is frequently focused solely on pain intensity. Epidural analgesia (EA) is the most effective form of labor pain relief; however, there is limited qualitative research on which aspects of pain relief parturients perceive as successful with EA. Understanding parturients' perspectives on successful pain relief with EA can help improve patient-centered care and enhance labor pain management strategies.

Aim: This qualitative study aims to explore parturients' perspectives on successful pain management during labor with EA, identifying key aspects that contribute to their overall childbirth experience.

Methods: A qualitative, semi-structured interview study will be conducted at Herlev Hospital, Denmark. Approximately 10-15 parturients who received EA during labor will be recruited using purposive sampling within 24 hours postpartum. Interviews will be recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework. Data collection will continue until sufficient information power is reached.

Ethical considerations: The study has been approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (case no. P-2025-18241) and adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants, and data will be anonymized to ensure confidentiality.

Expected outcomes: The study is expected to generate new insights into parturients' experiences of labor pain and EA, contributing to the development of patient-reported outcome measures and informing future clinical practice. Findings may also support the creation of standardized pain assessment tools and influence policies on labor pain management.

Dissemination: Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences to inform both clinical practice and future research.

产妇对分娩疼痛和硬膜外镇痛的看法:一项探索性质的研究方案。
背景:分娩是一件重要的生活事件,通常伴随着剧烈的疼痛。虽然痛觉是高度主观的,受多种因素的影响,但其管理往往只关注疼痛强度。硬膜外镇痛(EA)是缓解分娩疼痛最有效的方式;然而,关于产妇认为EA成功缓解疼痛的哪些方面的定性研究有限。了解产妇对EA成功缓解疼痛的看法有助于改善以患者为中心的护理和加强分娩疼痛管理策略。目的:本定性研究旨在探讨产妇对EA分娩过程中成功疼痛管理的看法,确定有助于其整体分娩体验的关键方面。方法:在丹麦Herlev医院进行定性、半结构化访谈研究。在分娩过程中接受EA治疗的约10-15名产妇将在产后24小时内进行有目的的抽样。访谈将被记录、转录,并使用布劳恩和克拉克的主题分析框架进行分析。数据收集将继续进行,直到达到足够的信息功率。伦理方面的考虑:该研究已获得丹麦数据保护局的批准(案例号)。P-2025-18241),并遵守《赫尔辛基宣言》。将获得所有参与者的知情同意,数据将匿名化以确保保密。预期结果:该研究有望对分娩疼痛和EA的产妇体验产生新的见解,有助于患者报告结果测量的发展,并为未来的临床实践提供信息。研究结果还可能支持创建标准化的疼痛评估工具,并影响分娩疼痛管理政策。传播:结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并在国家和国际会议上发表,为临床实践和未来的研究提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信